Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger Refuses to Testify Under Oath on Dominion Voting Machines

Breaking news out of Georgia as Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has refused to testify under oath regarding Dominion voting machines. This decision has raised eyebrows and sparked concerns about the security and integrity of the state’s election system.

The controversy surrounding Dominion voting machines has been a hot topic since the 2020 presidential election. Many supporters of former President Donald Trump have questioned the reliability of these machines and alleged that they were used to manipulate the election results.

According to a tweet by Leading Report, Raffensperger has not only refused to testify under oath but has also delayed the installation of Dominion’s security patches until after the 2024 presidential election. This revelation has further fueled suspicion and skepticism among those who have been critical of the voting system.

While Raffensperger has not provided a specific reason for his refusal to testify, critics argue that it raises doubts about his commitment to transparency and accountability. As the Secretary of State, Raffensperger plays a crucial role in overseeing the state’s elections and ensuring their fairness and accuracy. His decision to avoid testifying under oath may be seen as an attempt to avoid potential scrutiny and examination of the election process.

Furthermore, the delay in installing Dominion’s security patches has raised concerns about the vulnerability of Georgia’s election system. Security patches are essential for protecting voting machines from potential cyber threats and ensuring the integrity of the election results. By postponing the installation of these patches until after the 2024 presidential election, Raffensperger is leaving the system exposed to potential risks and attacks.

The timing of Raffensperger’s decision is also significant. With the 2024 presidential election approaching, it is crucial to address any concerns and doubts about the voting system to maintain public trust. By refusing to testify and delaying the installation of security patches, Raffensperger is prolonging the uncertainty surrounding the state’s election process.

It is important to note that Raffensperger has defended his actions, stating that the delay in installing security patches is due to the need for thorough testing and evaluation. He claims that rushing the installation process could potentially lead to more problems and vulnerabilities. However, critics argue that the delay only serves to perpetuate the mistrust and suspicions surrounding the Dominion voting machines.

The controversy surrounding the Dominion voting machines and Raffensperger’s refusal to testify under oath highlights the ongoing debate over election integrity. It underscores the need for transparency, accountability, and a thorough examination of the voting systems to ensure fair and accurate elections.

As this story continues to develop, it is crucial for officials and lawmakers to address the concerns raised by critics and take appropriate actions to restore public trust in the election process. The integrity of our democracy relies on the confidence of the people in the fairness and security of their votes.

Only time will tell how this situation unfolds and whether Raffensperger’s decision will have any lasting impact on the future of Georgia’s elections..

BREAKING: Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger refuses to testify under oath regarding Dominion voting machines and allegedly will not get around to installing Dominion’s security patches until after the 2024 presidential election.

— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) December 27, 2023

Source

@LeadingReport said BREAKING: Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger refuses to testify under oath regarding Dominion voting machines and allegedly will not get around to installing Dominion’s security patches until after the 2024 presidential election.

RELATED STORY.