SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY
1. Modi’s YES men in Election Commission
2. CJI removal from Election Commissioner panel
3. Election Commission integrity compromised
This is exactly why Modi wanted his YES men to be Election commissioners.
This is exactly why he removed CJI from the panel that appoints Election Commissioner.s.
There is no Election Commission left, the soul is dead, the body remains just for formality.
In a tweet by Roshan Rai, concerns are raised about the integrity of the Election Commission under Modi’s leadership. The tweet highlights Modi’s desire for compliant Election commissioners and his removal of the Chief Justice of India from the panel that appoints them. It suggests that the Election Commission has lost its independence and integrity, with the body remaining merely for formalities. This tweet raises important questions about the state of democracy and fair elections in India under Modi’s administration.
This is exactly why Modi wanted his YES men to be Election commissioners.
This is exactly why he removed CJI from the panel that appoints Election Commissioner.s.
RELATED STORIESThere is no Election Commission left, the soul is dead, the body remains just for formality.
— Roshan Rai (@RoshanKrRaii) May 5, 2024
Related Story.
In recent years, there has been growing concern over the state of the Election Commission in India, particularly regarding its independence and integrity. A tweet by Roshan Rai highlighted the alarming situation, pointing out that Prime Minister Modi’s actions have undermined the very foundation of the Election Commission.
One of the key issues raised in the tweet is Modi’s apparent desire to have his “YES men” appointed as Election commissioners. This raises serious questions about the impartiality and fairness of the electoral process in India. The role of the Election Commission is to ensure free and fair elections, but if its members are simply puppets of the ruling party, then the credibility of the entire electoral system is called into question.
Furthermore, the tweet also mentions the removal of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) from the panel that appoints Election Commissioners. This move is particularly concerning as it removes an important check and balance on the appointment process. Without the oversight of the CJI, there is a risk that appointments to the Election Commission could be made for political reasons rather than based on merit and suitability.
The tweet goes on to suggest that the Election Commission has lost its soul, with only a hollow shell remaining for formality. This paints a bleak picture of the current state of affairs and raises serious doubts about the effectiveness of the Election Commission in upholding democracy and ensuring fair elections.
It is crucial for any democracy to have a strong and independent Election Commission that can operate free from political interference. The integrity of the electoral process is essential for the legitimacy of the government and the trust of the people. Any attempts to undermine the independence of the Election Commission must be taken seriously and addressed promptly to protect the democratic principles of the country.
In light of these concerns, it is important for citizens, civil society organizations, and the media to remain vigilant and hold the government accountable for any actions that could jeopardize the integrity of the electoral process. Transparency and accountability are essential in ensuring that the Election Commission can fulfill its mandate effectively and uphold the democratic values of the country.
In conclusion, the tweet by Roshan Rai highlights the urgent need to address the challenges facing the Election Commission in India. The integrity and independence of the Election Commission are essential for the functioning of a healthy democracy, and any attempts to undermine these principles must be met with strong opposition. It is essential for the government to prioritize the credibility of the electoral process and ensure that the Election Commission remains a strong and independent institution.
