Leo Busch abortion 14th Amend. SCOTUS: Tim Busch: Abortion Isn’t a States Rights Issue, Plans to Use 14th Amendment

By | April 28, 2024

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

1. Abortion rights 14th Amendment
2. Leonard Leo SCOTUS influence
3. Tim Busch states rights abortion

They scammed the country. Leonard Leo ally Tim Busch says that abortion isn’t a “states rights” issue after all. Nope. They plan to use the 14th Amendment to overturn state constitutional amendments protecting abortion rights. He also calls SCOTUS the “Leo court.” 1/

Tim Busch, a close ally of Leonard Leo, reveals a disturbing plan to use the 14th Amendment to overturn state constitutional amendments protecting abortion rights. This shocking revelation comes from a tweet by jennycohn@toad.social, where Busch dismisses the idea of abortion being a “states rights” issue. Instead, he aims to manipulate the legal system to target state laws protecting abortion. Busch even goes as far as referring to the Supreme Court as the “Leo court.” This scheme to undermine reproductive rights is a clear example of how powerful individuals can exploit the legal system for their own agenda.

Related Story.

RELATED STORIES

In a recent tweet, it was revealed that Leonard Leo ally Tim Busch made a significant statement regarding the issue of abortion rights in the United States. According to Busch, abortion is not simply a “states rights” issue as previously thought. Instead, he and his allies are planning to utilize the 14th Amendment to challenge and overturn state constitutional amendments that protect abortion rights. This bold move could have far-reaching implications for the future of reproductive rights in the country.

The 14th Amendment, passed in the aftermath of the Civil War, guarantees equal protection under the law for all citizens. While it has been traditionally invoked to protect civil rights and liberties, Busch and his supporters are now aiming to use it to challenge state laws that restrict access to abortion. By framing abortion as a matter of equal protection, they hope to undermine existing legal protections for reproductive rights at the state level.

This development marks a significant shift in the strategy of anti-abortion activists, who have long relied on states’ rights arguments to push for restrictive abortion laws. By reframing the issue in terms of the 14th Amendment, Busch and his allies are seeking to bypass state legislatures and directly challenge the legality of abortion protections at the state level. This could have major implications for the future of Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide.

Busch’s comments also shed light on the influence of Leonard Leo, a prominent conservative activist who has played a key role in shaping the composition of the Supreme Court. By referring to the current court as the “Leo court,” Busch highlights the impact that Leo and his allies have had on the judiciary. This underscores the importance of judicial appointments in shaping the direction of legal policy in the United States.

The use of the 14th Amendment to challenge state abortion laws is likely to spark intense debate and legal battles in the coming months and years. Pro-choice advocates are likely to push back against this strategy, arguing that it undermines the rights of women to make decisions about their own bodies. On the other hand, anti-abortion activists see this as a potential opportunity to roll back protections for abortion rights and push for more restrictive laws.

As the legal landscape around abortion continues to evolve, it is clear that the issue remains deeply divisive and contentious in American society. The use of the 14th Amendment to challenge state abortion laws represents a new front in the battle over reproductive rights, with potentially far-reaching consequences for both sides of the debate. It will be crucial for advocates on both sides to closely monitor these developments and be prepared to engage in vigorous legal and political advocacy to protect their respective positions.

In conclusion, the revelation that Busch and his allies plan to use the 14th Amendment to challenge state abortion laws is a significant development that could have major implications for the future of reproductive rights in the United States. The framing of abortion as a matter of equal protection under the law represents a new strategy in the ongoing battle over reproductive rights, and it is likely to spark intense debate and legal battles in the months and years to come. Both pro-choice and anti-abortion advocates will need to be vigilant and proactive in their efforts to protect their respective positions on this deeply divisive issue.