Canadian Judge Rules “Libranos” Book Illegal and Orders Rebel News to Pay $13,000

In a groundbreaking decision, a Canadian judge has ruled that the controversial book “Libranos” published by Rebel News is illegal under the Elections Act. This ruling has sparked a heated debate about freedom of speech and the role of the media in political discourse.

The judge ordered Rebel News, an independent media organization led by Ezra Levant, to pay a hefty fine of $13,000 for publishing and promoting a book critical of a prominent politician. This decision has raised concerns about potential censorship and the ability of authors and journalists to express their opinions freely.

What makes this case particularly significant is that no other author has ever been prosecuted by Elections Canada for publishing and promoting a book critical of a politician. The Elections Act specifically exempts books from its regulations, recognizing the importance of freedom of expression in the literary world.

The “Libranos” book, written by an anonymous author, alleges corruption and wrongdoing by the politician in question, who is a member of the Liberal Party of Canada. The book gained significant attention and controversy upon its release, with some praising it as a valuable exposé and others condemning it as baseless propaganda.

Rebel News, known for its conservative perspective and critical stance towards the government, has been at the center of numerous legal battles over the years. This ruling is seen by many as an attempt to silence dissenting voices and restrict the media’s ability to hold politicians accountable.

Ezra Levant, the founder of Rebel News, has vowed to appeal the decision, stating that it sets a dangerous precedent for freedom of speech in Canada. Levant argues that the ruling not only violates the rights of authors and journalists but also undermines the public’s right to access diverse opinions and information.

The decision has sparked a wider debate on social media, with many expressing their concerns about the potential erosion of free speech in Canada. Supporters of Rebel News argue that this ruling is an attack on independent media and a violation of democratic principles.

On the other hand, proponents of the ruling argue that the book in question crosses the line between legitimate criticism and false allegations. They contend that the Elections Act exists to ensure fair and transparent elections, and any form of misinformation or defamation should be penalized.

As the controversy unfolds, legal experts and free speech advocates are closely monitoring the case, as it could have far-reaching implications for the future of freedom of expression in Canada’s media landscape. The outcome of Rebel News’ appeal will be closely watched by authors, journalists, and media organizations across the country.

In conclusion, the ruling by a Canadian judge that the book “Libranos” published by Rebel News is illegal under the Elections Act has ignited a fierce debate about freedom of speech and the media’s role in political discourse. The decision to fine Rebel News $13,000 for publishing a critical book sets a worrying precedent and raises concerns about censorship and the ability of authors and journalists to express their opinions freely.

.

BREAKING: Canadian Judge rules “Libranos” book illegal, orders Rebel News’ @EzraLevant to pay $13,000!

No other author has ever been prosecuted by Elections Canada for publishing and promoting a book that is critical of a politician.

The Elections Act specifically exempts books… pic.twitter.com/XcImTNzOGr

— Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) December 28, 2023

Source

@RebelNewsOnline said BREAKING: Canadian Judge rules “Libranos” book illegal, orders Rebel News' @ezralevant to pay $13,000! No other author has ever been prosecuted by Elections Canada for publishing and promoting a book that is critical of a politician. The Elections Act specifically exempts books… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

RELATED STORY.