Roseanne Barr Urges Paper Ballots & Voter IDs Nationwide for 2024 Election: Agree?

By | December 17, 2023



Why Roseanne Barr is Calling for Paper Ballots and Voter IDs for the 2024 Election

In a recent tweet, Roseanne Barr, the American actress and comedian, expressed her belief that paper ballots and voter IDs should be implemented in all 50 states for the upcoming 2024 election. Barr’s statement has sparked a heated debate among Americans, raising questions about the security and integrity of the electoral process.

With the increasing prevalence of electronic voting machines and concerns about potential interference, Barr’s call for a return to paper ballots aims to ensure the accuracy and transparency of the election results. Paper ballots provide a physical record that can be audited and verified, reducing the risk of tampering or hacking.

Additionally, Barr highlights the importance of voter identification as a means to prevent fraud. With voter ID laws in place, individuals would be required to present a valid ID before casting their vote, ensuring that only eligible citizens participate in the democratic process. Proponents argue that this measure would protect the integrity of elections and maintain public trust in the system.

However, Barr’s stance has faced criticism from those who believe paper ballots and voter IDs could disproportionately impact marginalized communities. Critics argue that these requirements could present barriers to voting for individuals who may have difficulty obtaining the necessary identification or who may face discrimination when attempting to do so.

The debate surrounding paper ballots and voter IDs is not new. It has been a topic of discussion for years, with supporters and opponents offering differing perspectives on the issue. Proponents argue that the security and transparency provided by paper ballots outweigh any potential drawbacks, while opponents emphasize the importance of accessibility and inclusivity in the electoral process.

As the 2024 election approaches, the question remains: should the United States adopt paper ballots and voter IDs as a standard practice? The answer is not simple, as it requires a careful balance between ensuring election integrity and safeguarding the rights of all citizens to participate in the democratic process.


Advocates for paper ballots point to countries like Canada and Germany, where paper-based voting systems have been successfully implemented for years. These systems have demonstrated their effectiveness in preventing fraud and providing trust in the electoral process. However, critics argue that the complexity and scale of the American electoral system may make a transition to paper ballots challenging.

Similarly, the question of voter IDs raises concerns about accessibility and potential voter suppression. Opponents argue that requiring IDs could disproportionately affect minority communities, the elderly, and low-income individuals, who may face difficulties obtaining the necessary identification. It is crucial to find a solution that balances security concerns with the need to ensure equal access to the ballot box.

Ultimately, the decision lies with policymakers and election officials. It is essential to consider the opinions of experts in election security, civil rights advocates, and the American public when making decisions that impact the integrity and accessibility of the electoral process. The upcoming 2024 election provides an opportunity for meaningful discussions and potential reforms to address these concerns.

While Roseanne Barr’s call for paper ballots and voter IDs has ignited a passionate debate, it serves as a reminder of the ongoing discussions surrounding the electoral process in the United States. As the country continues to strive for fair and secure elections, finding common ground and implementing effective solutions will be crucial in ensuring the integrity of democracy.



@IanJaeger29 said BREAKING: Roseanne Barr says we need paper ballots and voter IDs for all 50 states for the 2024 election. Do you agree with her?