Shocking Ruling: Met Police’s Facial Recognition Unlawful! — Facial recognition privacy concerns, UK human rights legal challenge, Met Police surveillance policies
facial recognition privacy concerns, human rights legal challenges, police surveillance regulations
BREAKING: The Met Police’s use of live facial recognition is UNLAWFUL – the UK’s human rights regulator believes
Today we can reveal to you that the EHRC will intervene in a landmark legal challenge to #StopFacialRecognition brought by our director @silkiecarlo & Shaun… pic.twitter.com/zRMw4WUij8
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Big Brother Watch (@BigBrotherWatch) August 20, 2025
The Met Police’s Use of Live Facial Recognition is Unlawful – The UK’s Human Rights Regulator Believes
In a significant ruling, the UK’s human rights regulator, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), has declared that the Metropolitan Police’s use of live facial recognition technology is unlawful. This landmark decision comes as part of a legal challenge spearheaded by activist Silkie Carlo and her team at Big Brother Watch. The EHRC’s intervention in this case aligns with growing public concern over privacy and civil liberties in the age of surveillance.
This ruling holds profound implications for the future of facial recognition technology in the UK. Many people are increasingly wary of how these technologies can infringe on their privacy rights. The concerns raised by the EHRC reflect a broader sentiment among citizens who advocate for stronger regulations on surveillance practices. The hashtag #StopFacialRecognition has gained traction, highlighting the public’s call for accountability and transparency in law enforcement procedures.
The use of live facial recognition has sparked heated debates about its effectiveness and ethical implications. Critics argue that the technology can lead to wrongful identifications, particularly affecting marginalized communities. As the EHRC steps into this legal battle, it aims to ensure that the rights of individuals are upheld, setting a precedent for how law enforcement agencies can utilize emerging technologies.
For those interested in further details, you can read more about this important issue from Big Brother Watch, which covers the ongoing developments in the legal challenge. This case is pivotal not just for the future of law enforcement practices but also for the broader conversation about privacy rights in our digital age.