In recent revelations regarding the assassination attempt on Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, investigative journalist Christo Grozev has identified key figures behind the poisoning incident. This shocking information has emerged from a series of tweets by Tymofiy Mylovanov, a prominent economist and political figure. His tweet highlights the involvement of high-ranking officers from the FSB (Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation) and indicates that the operation was personally approved by President Vladimir Putin. Particularly alarming is the role of a billionaire fugitive named János Marsalek, who allegedly led the assassination team.

### Background of Alexei Navalny

Alexei Navalny has been a significant figure in Russian politics, known for his anti-corruption efforts and opposition to the Kremlin. His outspoken criticism of Putin’s government has made him a target for repression. In August 2020, Navalny was poisoned with a nerve agent, which led to international outrage and condemnation of the Russian government. After receiving treatment in Germany, he returned to Russia in January 2021, where he was immediately arrested and has since been imprisoned.

### The FSB’s Role in Navalny’s Poisoning

According to Grozev’s findings, the FSB officers involved in the plot were operating under direct orders from the Kremlin. This assertion underscores the extent to which the Russian state apparatus is willing to go to silence dissent. The use of state security forces for such covert operations raises ethical questions and points to a broader pattern of political repression in Russia.

### Putin’s Approval

Mylovanov’s tweet makes a startling claim: that Putin personally approved the targeting of Navalny. This level of involvement from the highest echelons of power signifies a troubling trend in Russian politics, where dissent is not only suppressed but actively targeted at the state level. The implications of this revelation resonate beyond Russia, inviting scrutiny from international communities and human rights organizations.

### The Role of János Marsalek

Another critical figure in this narrative is János Marsalek, a fugitive billionaire known for his murky connections and alleged involvement in various illicit activities. His reported role as the leader of the assassination team adds another layer of intrigue to the story. Marsalek, who has been on the run since 2020, has connections to various shady operations across Europe and beyond. The involvement of such a figure in a state-sponsored assassination attempt raises questions about the extent of corruption and complicity within Russia and its international networks.

### International Reactions

The revelations made by Grozev and corroborated by Mylovanov have triggered a wave of condemnation from Western governments and human rights advocates. There is a growing call for further investigations into Navalny’s poisoning and for accountability for those involved. The international community is increasingly concerned about the implications of state-sponsored violence and the erosion of democratic norms in Russia.

### Conclusion

The identification of FSB officers and the direct involvement of Vladimir Putin in the poisoning of Alexei Navalny is a grave indication of the lengths to which the Russian state will go to eliminate political opponents. The involvement of János Marsalek adds a complex layer to the narrative, highlighting the intertwining of criminal networks and state power. As the world watches, the need for accountability and justice for Navalny becomes paramount. The implications of these events extend beyond individual cases, raising essential discussions about human rights, governance, and the future of political dissent in Russia.

These developments emphasize the critical importance of investigative journalism in exposing the truth behind state-sponsored actions. The work of individuals like Grozev shines a light on the dark corners of political machinations and serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for democracy and justice in oppressive regimes.

Grozev identified FSB officers behind Navalny’s poisoning.

Putin personally approved targeting him. Moscow used Marsalek — a billionaire fugitive — to lead the kill team.

3/

— Tymofiy Mylovanov (@Mylovanov) June 22, 2025

Grozev Identified FSB Officers Behind Navalny’s Poisoning

The saga surrounding Alexei Navalny, a prominent Russian opposition leader, has taken numerous twists and turns, but recent revelations are chilling. Investigative journalist Christo Grozev has come forward with explosive claims that FSB officers were behind Navalny’s poisoning. This shocking assertion raises serious questions about the extent of state-sponsored actions against dissidents in Russia.

Navalny’s poisoning in 2020 sent shockwaves across the globe. The Kremlin’s alleged involvement has long been debated, but Grozev’s identification of specific FSB officers lends a new level of credibility to these claims. The FSB, or the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation, is often compared to the KGB, and it’s notorious for its role in suppressing dissent and executing covert operations.

This identification by Grozev not only highlights the ongoing risks faced by opposition figures in Russia but also showcases the lengths to which the state will go to silence its critics. With Grozev’s investigative work, the narrative around Navalny’s poisoning becomes not just a story of one individual’s struggle but a broader commentary on the Russian government’s approach to dissent.

Putin Personally Approved Targeting Him

The implications of Grozev’s findings deepen when considering the claim that President Vladimir Putin personally approved the targeting of Navalny. This isn’t just a matter of political maneuvering; it suggests a disturbing level of personal involvement from the highest office in orchestrating actions against opposition figures.

When a leader is willing to endorse such extreme measures, it reflects the broader environment of fear and repression within the country. The chilling effect this has on other potential dissenters cannot be overstated. If the government is willing to poison a prominent figure like Navalny, what does that mean for ordinary citizens who might dare to speak out?

This personal endorsement from Putin not only adds gravity to the situation but also indicates a systemic issue within the Russian political landscape. It’s a dangerous precedent that could encourage further acts of violence against those who oppose the regime. The message is clear: dissent will not be tolerated, and the state will go to any lengths to maintain control.

Moscow Used Marsalek — A Billionaire Fugitive — to Lead the Kill Team

Perhaps one of the most intriguing aspects of this entire saga is the alleged involvement of a notorious figure like János Marsalek, a billionaire fugitive believed to be leading the kill team. Marsalek’s background is as colorful as it is controversial. Known for his connections with various intelligence agencies and criminal organizations, his role in this operation adds a layer of complexity to an already convoluted narrative.

Why would Moscow turn to a fugitive like Marsalek? Perhaps it’s the deniability factor. Using an individual who is already on the run could provide a buffer between the Kremlin and the operation, making it harder to trace back to state officials. This tactic of employing unofficial actors to carry out state-sanctioned actions is not new but underscores the lengths to which the Russian government is willing to go to achieve its objectives.

The notion that a fugitive from law enforcement could be orchestrating high-stakes operations on behalf of the state reflects a disturbing reality. It’s not just a matter of political power; it’s a matter of survival for those who dare to oppose the status quo. As more details emerge, the international community must grapple with the implications of such alliances and actions.

The Broader Implications of These Revelations

The revelations surrounding Navalny’s poisoning, particularly the identification of FSB officers, Putin’s personal involvement, and the use of a fugitive like Marsalek, paint a bleak picture of the current political climate in Russia. These events are more than just individual incidents; they are part of a larger narrative about the repression of dissent and the lengths to which the Russian government will go to maintain power.

For many, the implications are profound. If the Russian government is willing to engage in such brazen acts of violence against its own citizens, what does that mean for the future of democracy in the country? The chilling reality is that it sends a message to anyone considering opposing the regime: the risks are incredibly high.

Moreover, these events challenge the international community’s response to authoritarianism. As nations grapple with how to engage with Russia, the need for a unified stance against such actions becomes increasingly clear. Sanctions and diplomatic pressure may be necessary steps, but they must be coupled with a commitment to supporting human rights and democratic movements within Russia.

The Role of Investigative Journalism

In a world where misinformation can spread like wildfire, the role of investigative journalism has never been more critical. Journalists like Christo Grozev play a pivotal role in uncovering the truth and holding powerful figures accountable. By exposing the involvement of FSB officers and the Kremlin in Navalny’s poisoning, Grozev has not only provided clarity but has also ignited discussions about the responsibilities of governments toward their citizens.

The courage it takes to pursue such investigations in the face of potential backlash is commendable. Journalists are often the first line of defense against tyranny, and their work can inspire others to stand up against oppression. In an age where media can be weaponized, the importance of credible, thorough journalism cannot be overstated.

As more people become aware of these issues, it creates a ripple effect. Awareness can lead to action, and action can lead to change. The revelations about Navalny’s poisoning and the players involved should serve as a rallying cry for those who believe in justice and human rights.

Conclusion: The Fight Against Oppression Continues

The situation surrounding Alexei Navalny serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing struggles against oppression and authoritarianism. The identification of FSB officers behind Navalny’s poisoning, coupled with Putin’s personal approval and the involvement of a fugitive like Marsalek, highlights the severe risks faced by those who dare to oppose the Russian government.

As the world watches, the necessity for solidarity in the fight against tyranny becomes increasingly important. Standing up for human rights, supporting investigative journalism, and advocating for democratic values are all essential components of this struggle. The narrative surrounding Navalny is not just about one man; it’s a battle for the soul of a nation, and it’s a battle that must be fought on multiple fronts.