In a recent tweet, Owen (@_OwenM_) highlighted a significant issue in the world of track and field: the need for complete and transparent storytelling when it comes to breaking news. This commentary emphasizes the persistent problem of gatekeeping in the sport, which not only hinders open communication but also detracts from the overall credibility and seriousness of track and field as a professional athletic endeavor. In this summary, we will explore the implications of Owen’s statement, the importance of transparency in sports journalism, and the potential benefits of normalizing comprehensive reporting in track and field.

### The Importance of Complete Stories in Track and Field

Track and field, like any other sport, thrives on storytelling. Whether it’s about an athlete’s incredible performance, a record-breaking event, or a controversy, the narrative surrounding these events shapes public perception and understanding of the sport. Owen’s call to “normalize posting complete stories” reflects a growing frustration within the community regarding the incomplete and sometimes misleading information that often circulates during breaking news events.

When news is selectively reported or only partial information is shared, it opens the floor to speculation. This speculation can lead to misinformation, which not only damages the reputation of the athletes involved but also undermines the integrity of the sport itself. Fans, potential sponsors, and new audiences may find it difficult to take the sport seriously if they are constantly faced with half-truths and ambiguous reports.

### The Dangers of Gatekeeping in Sports Journalism

Gatekeeping, in the context of journalism, refers to the control exercised by certain individuals or entities over what information is made available to the public. In track and field, this can manifest in various ways, such as withholding critical details about an athlete’s performance, injuries, or personal issues. The implications of this gatekeeping are profound.

Firstly, it creates a barrier between fans and the sport. When fans do not have access to complete and accurate information, they may develop misconceptions or lack a full understanding of the events they are following. This can lead to disengagement, as fans might feel they are not being treated as informed stakeholders in the sport.

Secondly, gatekeeping can harm athletes. When news is selectively reported, athletes may find themselves at the center of rumors and speculation that can affect their mental health and public image. In this age of social media, where information travels fast and opinions can be formed quickly, the impact of incomplete stories can be magnified.

### Speculation vs. Transparency

Owen’s tweet suggests that constant speculation arises from a lack of transparency in reporting. When journalists fail to provide the full context of a situation, it leaves room for conjecture. This can lead to scenarios where athletes are unfairly judged or criticized based on incomplete information.

For example, if an athlete withdraws from a competition due to an undisclosed injury, the lack of clarity might lead fans to speculate about their commitment to the sport or suggest that they are hiding something. This not only affects the athlete’s reputation but also perpetuates a culture of mistrust among fans towards the sport itself.

Conversely, when journalists report complete stories, they provide the necessary context that can help audiences understand the complexities of an athlete’s situation. Transparency fosters a more informed fan base, encouraging deeper engagement and empathy towards the athletes’ challenges and achievements.

### Building Credibility in Track and Field

To take track and field seriously, as Owen suggests, the sport must cultivate an environment of credibility. This can be achieved through responsible journalism that prioritizes accuracy and completeness.

By normalizing the practice of sharing comprehensive stories, the sport can shift the narrative from speculation to informed discussion. This not only benefits fans but also strengthens the community around track and field.

When fans feel informed, they are more likely to engage with the sport, attend events, and support athletes. Additionally, sponsors are more inclined to invest in a sport that demonstrates professionalism and transparency. This can lead to increased funding and better opportunities for athletes at all levels.

### The Role of Social Media

In today’s digital age, social media plays a crucial role in how information is disseminated and consumed. Platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook have become primary sources for breaking news, but they also pose challenges. The rapid nature of social media can sometimes lead to misinformation spreading faster than the truth.

Owen’s tweet highlights the potential of social media to foster dialogue about the importance of complete storytelling. By using these platforms to call for transparency, athletes, journalists, and fans can work together to advocate for better reporting standards in track and field.

Moreover, social media can serve as a tool for athletes to share their own stories directly with fans. This can help combat speculation and provide a more accurate narrative of their experiences, further enhancing transparency within the sport.

### Conclusion

Owen’s call to normalize the posting of complete stories in track and field is a crucial reminder of the importance of transparency in sports journalism. By moving away from gatekeeping and speculation, the sport can build a more informed and engaged fan base, enhance the credibility of its athletes, and foster a culture of trust and respect.

As track and field continues to evolve, embracing the practice of comprehensive reporting will be essential for its growth and acceptance as a serious sport. By prioritizing complete stories, the community can collectively take strides toward a more transparent and credible future in track and field.

Let’s please normalise posting complete stories in regard to breaking news in track and field.

Constant gatekeeping has no positive benefits whatsoever and only opens the floor to speculation. It makes it very hard for people to take the sport seriously.

I respect the work of…

— Owen (@_OwenM_) June 19, 2025

Let’s Please Normalise Posting Complete Stories in Regard to Breaking News in Track and Field

In the world of track and field, just like in any sport, breaking news can spark conversations and debates. But what happens when the information shared is partial or misleading? This is where the call to “normalise posting complete stories in regard to breaking news in track and field” comes into play. Engaging with the audience and providing a full picture is essential for maintaining the integrity of the sport and fostering a serious fan base.

When news breaks about an athlete’s performance, a major event, or even a scandal, it’s crucial that the information shared is comprehensive. Fans want to know the full context, not just snippets that may lead to misunderstandings or speculation. It’s about clarity and transparency, and without these, the sport could easily lose credibility.

Constant Gatekeeping Has No Positive Benefits Whatsoever

Gatekeeping in sports journalism can be detrimental. When certain individuals or organizations control the flow of information, it can lead to a skewed perception of events. For instance, if only select voices are allowed to share updates, fans may feel alienated or confused. The lack of diverse perspectives can lead to a narrow understanding of what’s happening in track and field.

Moreover, when gatekeeping prevails, it opens the floor to speculation. Fans and analysts might fill in the gaps with their interpretations, often leading to rumors that could harm an athlete’s reputation or the sport’s image. A great example of this can be found in the coverage of athlete injuries. If an athlete is sidelined and the reasons are not fully disclosed, speculation can run rampant. This can create unnecessary pressure and anxiety for both the athlete and their fans.

Promoting transparency and encouraging everyone to share complete stories can help mitigate these issues. The more information that is available, the less room there is for rumor and conjecture. This, in turn, fosters a more informed and engaged audience.

It Opens the Floor to Speculation

Speculation can be exciting in some contexts, but in track and field, it can lead to misinformation and distrust. When fans don’t have the full story, they might speculate on an athlete’s performance, motives, or even their personal lives. This not only affects the athlete but can also distort public perception of the sport as a whole.

For example, when a high-profile athlete withdraws from a competition, the immediate reaction might be a flurry of speculation about their health, motivation, or training regimen. If the reasons behind their withdrawal are not clearly communicated, fans may jump to conclusions that could be wildly inaccurate. This could lead to a negative backlash against the athlete, who may simply need time to recover or reassess their strategy.

By normalising the sharing of complete stories, we can create an environment where fans feel respected and informed. This is particularly important for younger fans who are just starting to engage with the sport. They need to see that valid, well-rounded narratives exist, not just sensationalized snippets.

It Makes It Very Hard for People to Take the Sport Seriously

Perception is everything in sports. If fans feel that they’re only receiving fragmented information, they may begin to question the legitimacy of what they’re following. In a world where sports are increasingly becoming a part of social media, the authenticity of news is more important than ever.

When we look at other sports, there’s a trend toward transparency and open communication. The NBA, for instance, often shares updates directly from teams and players, making it easy for fans to understand the context of any breaking news. This approach has helped cultivate a loyal fan base that appreciates the honesty and clarity of information.

In contrast, when fans feel that they’re being fed incomplete news in track and field, it can create a disconnect. How can we expect people to take the sport seriously if they’re left in the dark? By promoting the idea of sharing complete stories, we can bridge this gap and cultivate a more engaged audience.

I Respect the Work of

When discussing the importance of transparency and the need for complete stories in track and field, it’s essential to acknowledge the hard work of journalists and content creators in this space. Many individuals are dedicated to providing accurate, in-depth coverage of events, athletes, and issues within the sport. They strive to dig deep and present the full narrative, often going above and beyond to ensure that fans are well informed.

However, it’s not just up to journalists. Athletes, coaches, and organizations also play a crucial role in this ecosystem. By being proactive in sharing their stories, they can help shape the narrative and provide context that might otherwise be overlooked. Social media platforms offer an excellent opportunity for athletes to communicate directly with their fans, and when they take advantage of these tools, it enriches the overall experience for everyone involved.

Moreover, fans themselves can contribute to this culture of openness. Engaging with content, asking questions, and expressing a desire for complete stories can encourage a more comprehensive approach to news coverage. When fans demand transparency, it sends a clear message to those in charge that they value full narratives over sensationalism.

The Path Forward: Embracing Transparency

To truly normalise the sharing of complete stories in track and field, a collective effort is needed. This includes journalists, athletes, teams, and fans working together to create an environment where information flows freely and accurately. Everyone has a role to play in this narrative.

For journalists, this means taking the time to research and present thorough stories that don’t shy away from the complexities of events. It’s about going beyond the headlines and delving into the why and how of breaking news. Athletes, on the other hand, should feel empowered to share their truths, whether through interviews, social media, or other platforms.

Fans can help drive this change by supporting those who provide in-depth coverage and holding those who fall short accountable. If a story lacks depth or context, expressing that feedback can lead to improvements in how news is shared in the future.

Conclusion

The demand for transparency in track and field is more than just a trend; it’s a necessary evolution for the sport. By normalising the sharing of complete stories, we can create a more informed, engaged, and respectful community. It’s time to move past gatekeeping and speculation and embrace a culture of openness. With each step toward transparency, we’re not only enhancing the experience for fans but also ensuring that the sport itself is taken seriously.

In the end, we’re all in this together—athletes, journalists, and fans alike. Let’s commit to fostering an environment where complete stories are the norm, and the sport of track and field can thrive.