The Assassination of Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman: A Political Tragedy and Its Implications

On June 14, 2025, the political world was shaken by the shocking assassination of Minnesota Representative Melissa Hortman. Known for her strong stance on healthcare policies, Hortman was notably the only democrat to oppose a proposal for free healthcare for undocumented immigrants. This controversial vote has led many to speculate that her assassination could be politically motivated, igniting widespread outrage and conspiracy theories.

The Political Context

Melissa Hortman was a significant figure in Minnesota’s political landscape, recognized for her leadership and advocacy on various issues, especially healthcare. Her dissenting vote against the healthcare proposal created a divide among lawmakers and constituents, placing her in the crosshairs of a highly charged political debate. The timing of her assassination has prompted discussions on the potential motivations behind her death, with some commentators labeling it a "political hit job."

• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

Speculations and Reactions

The immediate aftermath of Hortman’s assassination has seen a rise in speculation about the motives behind this tragic event. Many political analysts suggest that her opposition to free healthcare for undocumented immigrants may have made her a target. Social media platforms have become rife with theories, with users like Nick Sortor asserting that the assassination "REEKS of a political hit job." This narrative highlights the polarization surrounding immigration and healthcare issues in the United States, raising concerns about the potential for political violence.

The Impact on Minnesota Politics

Hortman’s untimely death is poised to have profound implications for Minnesota politics. As a prominent Democratic leader, her absence could shift the balance of power within the state legislature and complicate the party’s efforts to advance healthcare and immigration initiatives. Additionally, this event is likely to prompt lawmakers and constituents alike to reconsider the safety of public officials and the broader political discourse.

Social Media’s Role in Shaping Perceptions

In the digital age, social media platforms play a critical role in shaping public opinions and disseminating information. The rapid spread of news regarding Hortman’s assassination highlights how quickly narratives can form and influence perceptions. However, while social media allows for diverse viewpoints, it also risks amplifying misinformation and conspiracy theories, complicating the narrative surrounding such tragic events.

Moving Forward

As investigations into the assassination continue, the political landscape in Minnesota and beyond will be closely monitored. The implications for healthcare policy and political discourse are significant. Lawmakers must address the rising concerns over political violence and foster respectful dialogue to prevent further polarization. The legacy of Melissa Hortman will be remembered not only for her contributions to Minnesota politics but also as a cautionary tale about the consequences of divisive rhetoric.

Understanding the Political Climate

The assassination of Melissa Hortman serves as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by political polarization in the United States. The contentious debate over healthcare access for undocumented immigrants reflects broader societal divides, where political disagreements can escalate into violence. This tragic incident underscores the need for a reassessment of how political discourse is conducted and the potential repercussions of extreme polarization.

The Consequences of Political violence

Political violence can have far-reaching effects beyond the immediate tragedy. It breeds an atmosphere of fear among lawmakers and their constituents, impeding open political dialogue. When discussions shift from policy to security concerns, it stifles meaningful engagement on critical issues, such as healthcare reform.

Examining Healthcare Policies

The debate around healthcare for undocumented immigrants is multifaceted. While supporters argue that access to healthcare is a fundamental right, opponents raise concerns about the financial implications for taxpayers. Hortman’s opposition to the bill placed her at the center of this contentious issue, raising questions about the risks associated with political dissent.

The Dangers of Political Polarization

The growing polarization in American politics is a significant concern. As parties become more entrenched in their ideologies, the ability to engage in constructive dialogue diminishes. The assassination of a public figure over a divisive issue like healthcare serves as a grim reminder of the potential consequences of such polarization, compelling society to rethink how political discussions are framed.

The Impact on Future Legislation

Hortman’s assassination is likely to influence future legislative approaches. Lawmakers may become more cautious in their decision-making, fearing for their safety or backlash from constituents. This could lead to stagnation in addressing pressing issues, as politicians may shy away from controversial topics for fear of repercussions.

Moving Forward: A Call for Change

In light of these tragic events, it is crucial for society to reflect on the current political climate and advocate for civil discourse that encourages understanding and respect for differing opinions. This involves prioritizing factual information over sensational narratives and recognizing the role of social media in shaping public perceptions.

The Role of Lawmakers

Lawmakers have a responsibility to foster a safe political environment. This includes not only enhancing personal security but also ensuring that constituents feel safe expressing their beliefs. Engaging with the public through town hall meetings and community forums can help bridge divides and promote understanding.

Conclusion: A Call for Unity

The assassination of Minnesota Representative Melissa Hortman has opened a complex dialogue about politics, safety, and the potential consequences of divisive rhetoric in contemporary society. As we navigate this challenging landscape, it is imperative to focus on constructive discourse that promotes understanding and unity. By doing so, we honor the memory of those who have lost their lives in political service and strive for a better future for our democracy.

In conclusion, the events surrounding Melissa Hortman’s assassination serve as a crucial reminder of the importance of civility in political discourse. It is time for lawmakers and citizens alike to engage in dialogue that fosters respect and understanding, ensuring that such tragedies do not overshadow the democratic values we strive to uphold.

Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman’s Assassination Sparks Outrage and Conspiracy

political assassination theories, healthcare policy controversy, Minnesota politics news

Summary of the Controversial Incident Involving Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman

On June 14, 2025, a shocking incident unfolded when Minnesota Representative Melissa Hortman was reported as assassinated. This tragic event has sparked considerable controversy and debate, particularly due to the political implications surrounding her death. Hortman was notably the only democrat to vote against a proposal for free healthcare for undocumented immigrants, leading to speculations about the motives behind her assassination.

The Political Context

Melissa Hortman served as a prominent figure in Minnesota politics and was known for her strong stances on various issues, including healthcare. The proposal for free healthcare for undocumented immigrants was a highly contentious topic, dividing opinions among lawmakers and constituents alike. Hortman’s decision to oppose this measure placed her at the center of a heated political landscape, making her an influential player in ongoing debates surrounding healthcare policy.

The timing of her assassination has raised eyebrows, with many commentators suggesting that it could be more than mere coincidence. Social media platforms, particularly Twitter, have become a hub for discussions and theories about the nature of her death. Some users, including Nick Sortor, have openly suggested that her assassination could be linked to her political stance, calling it a “political hit job” and drawing parallels to infamous political conspiracies.

Speculations and Reactions

The immediate aftermath of Hortman’s assassination has seen a surge in speculation regarding the potential motives behind this tragic event. Many political analysts and commentators have pointed to the possibility that her opposition to free healthcare for undocumented immigrants made her a target. The phrase “REEKS of a political hit job” was used in social media discussions, highlighting the belief that her death may have been orchestrated due to her political positions.

This narrative has been further fueled by the intense polarization surrounding immigration and healthcare in the United States. The heated debates on these topics have created an environment where political disagreements can escalate to dangerous levels. As a result, the assassination of a lawmaker like Hortman has the potential to ignite further tensions within the political landscape.

The Impact on Minnesota Politics

Melissa Hortman’s death is likely to have significant implications for Minnesota politics. As a leader in the Democratic Party, her absence will undoubtedly create a vacuum that could shift the balance of power within the state’s legislature. The Democratic Party may face challenges in rallying support for key initiatives, particularly those related to healthcare and immigration.

Moreover, the circumstances surrounding her assassination could lead to increased scrutiny of political discourse and the safety of public officials. Lawmakers may feel the need to address the rising concerns over political violence and its impact on democratic processes. This incident may serve as a wake-up call for politicians and constituents alike to foster a more respectful and constructive dialogue, especially on divisive issues.

Social Media’s Role in Shaping Perceptions

In today’s digital age, social media plays a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions and disseminating information. The rapid spread of news regarding Hortman’s assassination on platforms like Twitter has amplified discussions and debates surrounding her death. The use of hashtags, retweets, and viral posts contributes to the formation of narratives that can sway public opinion.

However, the role of social media in such situations can also be complex. While it allows for a diverse range of opinions to be expressed, it can also lead to the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories. As the investigation into Hortman’s assassination unfolds, it will be crucial for news outlets and social media platforms to ensure that accurate information is prioritized over sensationalism.

Moving Forward

As the investigation into the assassination of Melissa Hortman continues, the political landscape in Minnesota and beyond will likely be shaped by this tragic event. Lawmakers, constituents, and political commentators will be watching closely to see how this situation evolves and what it means for the future of healthcare policy, immigration reform, and political discourse.

The legacy of Melissa Hortman will undoubtedly be remembered not only for her contributions to Minnesota politics but also for the circumstances surrounding her untimely death. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of political polarization and the importance of fostering dialogue that prioritizes respect and understanding.

As more information becomes available regarding the investigation and potential motives behind her assassination, it will be essential for all stakeholders to engage in thoughtful discussions that honor her memory and reflect on the broader implications for democracy and public safety.

In conclusion, the assassination of Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman has opened a complex dialogue about politics, safety, and the potential consequences of divisive rhetoric in contemporary society. As we navigate this challenging landscape, it is imperative to focus on constructive discourse that promotes understanding and unity, ensuring that such tragedies do not overshadow the democratic values we strive to uphold.

There is NO WAY it’s a coincidence that Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman, who was ass*ssinated this morning, just HAPPENED to be the sole democrat NO vote on free healthcare for illegals

NO WAY.

The REEKS of a political hit job. Luigi 2.0.
h/t @BreannaMorello pic.twitter.com/GW5QXCXVJO

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 14, 2025

The recent tragic assassination of Minnesota Representative Melissa Hortman has sent shockwaves throughout the political landscape. As the only democrat to vote against a bill proposing free healthcare for undocumented immigrants, her untimely death raises serious questions about the intersection of politics and violence. In this article, we will delve into the implications of this incident, explore the broader context of political disagreements, and examine how such events can shape public discourse.

Understanding the Political Climate

Politics in the United States has always been a contentious arena, but recent years have seen heightened tensions. The polarization among parties has created an environment where disagreements do not merely result in debates; they can lead to serious consequences, including violence. The assassination of Melissa Hortman is a stark reminder of how far political divisions can escalate.

The topic of healthcare for undocumented immigrants is particularly divisive. Proponents argue that access to healthcare is a fundamental human right, while opponents fear the financial implications for taxpayers. Hortman’s dissenting vote placed her at the center of a controversial issue, making her a target for those who opposed her stance.

The Role of Social Media in Shaping Opinions

In our digital age, social media platforms have become battlegrounds for political discourse. The tweet by Nick Sortor that sparked considerable discussion exemplifies how quickly information—and misinformation—can spread. With millions of users on platforms like Twitter, a single tweet can influence public perception and incite reactions.

Sortor’s assertion that the assassination “REEKS of a political hit job” is indicative of a growing trend where social media users are quick to jump to conclusions. This kind of rhetoric can lead to the further division of opinions and can even incite violence among those who feel strongly about political issues. The role of social media in amplifying political sentiments cannot be overstated.

The Concept of Political Assassination

Political assassination is not a new phenomenon. Throughout history, there have been numerous examples where political figures have been targeted due to their beliefs or actions. The assassination of Melissa Hortman raises questions about whether we are witnessing the emergence of a new wave of political violence.

In such cases, scholars and political analysts often look for patterns. Is this an isolated incident, or does it signify a trend in which dissenting voices are silenced? The fear of political assassination can deter individuals from expressing their views, leading to a chilling effect on free speech.

The Consequences of Political violence

The implications of political violence extend beyond the immediate tragedy. The assassination of a public figure can create an atmosphere of fear among lawmakers and their constituents. It raises questions about the safety of elected officials and can discourage citizens from engaging in political processes.

Furthermore, when political violence occurs, it can shift the focus of public discourse. Instead of discussing policy and governance, the conversation often turns to security and fear. This shift can hinder meaningful dialogue on important issues, such as healthcare reform.

Examining Healthcare Policies

The debate over healthcare for undocumented immigrants is multifaceted. In the case of Minnesota, the proposed bill aimed to provide free healthcare to all residents, regardless of immigration status. Supporters argue that providing healthcare is not only a moral obligation but also a public health necessity. In contrast, opponents express concerns over the financial burden on taxpayers and the potential for abuse of the system.

Hortman’s opposition to the bill, as the only democrat to vote against it, positioned her as a controversial figure. Her assassination raises important questions about the nature of political dissent and the consequences of taking a stand on contentious issues.

The Dangers of Political Polarization

Political polarization is a growing concern in the United States. As parties become more entrenched in their ideologies, the ability to engage in constructive dialogue diminishes. This polarization can lead to a lack of understanding and empathy between opposing sides, fostering an environment where violence becomes a possible outcome.

The assassination of a lawmaker, particularly over a divisive issue like healthcare, serves as a grim reminder of the consequences of such polarization. It challenges us to rethink how we engage in political discourse and consider the ramifications of our words and actions.

The Impact on Future Legislation

The assassination of Melissa Hortman will undoubtedly impact how future legislation is approached. Lawmakers may become more cautious in their decision-making, fearing for their safety or the potential backlash from constituents. This can lead to a stagnation in progress, as politicians may shy away from addressing controversial topics.

Moreover, the fear of violence can create an environment where only the most extreme voices are heard. Moderate perspectives may be drowned out, leading to an even greater divide within the political landscape.

Moving Forward: A Call for Change

In light of recent events, it is crucial for society to reflect on the current political climate. As citizens, we must advocate for a more civil discourse that encourages understanding and respect for differing opinions. This means moving beyond sensationalist narratives and engaging in thoughtful discussions about the issues that matter.

Additionally, there must be a concerted effort to address the root causes of political violence. This includes examining the role of social media in shaping opinions and the potential for inciting violence through incendiary rhetoric.

The Role of Lawmakers

Lawmakers have a responsibility to foster a safe environment for political discourse. This includes not only protecting themselves but also ensuring that their constituents feel safe to express their beliefs. The assassination of a public figure like Melissa Hortman underscores the need for enhanced security measures and support systems for elected officials.

Moreover, politicians must engage with their constituents in meaningful ways. Town hall meetings, community forums, and open discussions can help bridge the gap between differing viewpoints. By creating spaces for dialogue, lawmakers can work to reduce tensions and promote understanding.

Conclusion: A Call for Unity

The assassination of Minnesota Representative Melissa Hortman serves as a tragic reminder of the dangers of political polarization and violence. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is essential to prioritize civil discourse and seek common ground. By fostering an environment where differing opinions can be expressed safely, we can work towards a brighter future for our democracy.

In a time when political divisions seem insurmountable, let us come together to advocate for a more compassionate and understanding society. Through dialogue and collaboration, we can honor the legacy of those who have lost their lives in the line of political service and strive for a better tomorrow.

There is NO WAY it’s a coincidence that Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman, who was ass*ssinated this morning, just HAPPENED to be the sole democrat NO vote on free healthcare for illegals

NO WAY.

The REEKS of a political hit job. Luigi 2.0.
h/t @BreannaMorello

Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman’s Assassination Sparks Outrage and Conspiracy

political assassination theories, healthcare policy controversy, Minnesota politics news

Summary of the Controversial Incident Involving Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman

On June 14, 2025, Minnesota was rocked by the assassination of Representative Melissa Hortman. This shocking event has stirred a maelstrom of controversy, especially given its political implications. Hortman, notably the only democrat to vote against a proposal for free healthcare for undocumented immigrants, has left many speculating about the motivations behind her death. Could it be a chilling coincidence, or something more sinister?

The Political Context

Melissa Hortman was no stranger to the political arena in Minnesota. She was a prominent advocate for various issues, and her stance on healthcare made her a pivotal figure in the ongoing debates. The proposal for free healthcare for undocumented immigrants was particularly polarizing, drawing passionate responses from across the political spectrum. Hortman’s opposition to this measure placed her in the spotlight, making her a key player in discussions that have divided lawmakers and constituents alike.

Following her assassination, many commentators have pointed to the timing as suspicious. Social media platforms, especially Twitter, exploded with theories about the nature of her death. Some users, like Nick Sortor, suggested that her assassination might be linked to her political stance, labeling it a “political hit job.” This line of thinking has sparked a variety of conspiracy theories regarding the motivations behind political violence in the U.S.

Speculations and Reactions

In the wake of Hortman’s assassination, speculation has run rampant. Political analysts are pondering whether her dissent against free healthcare for undocumented immigrants made her a target. Social media discussions buzzed with phrases like “REEKS of a political hit job,” which highlights the belief that her death may have been orchestrated due to her political positions.

The intense polarization surrounding immigration and healthcare has created a climate where political disagreements can escalate dangerously. The assassination of a lawmaker like Hortman raises alarms about the potential for further violence and unrest within the political landscape.

The Impact on Minnesota Politics

Hortman’s untimely demise is likely to have far-reaching consequences for Minnesota politics. As a leader within the Democratic Party, her absence creates a power vacuum that could dramatically alter the dynamics in the state legislature. The party may struggle to rally support for crucial initiatives, particularly those related to healthcare and immigration reform.

Moreover, the circumstances surrounding her assassination may lead to heightened scrutiny of political discourse and the safety of public officials. Lawmakers may feel compelled to address growing concerns about political violence and its implications for democracy. This incident serves as a wake-up call for politicians and constituents alike, emphasizing the need for respectful dialogue, particularly on contentious issues.

Social Media’s Role in Shaping Perceptions

In today’s digital age, social media plays an essential role in shaping public perceptions. The rapid dissemination of news surrounding Hortman’s assassination on platforms like Twitter has intensified discussions about her death. The use of hashtags, retweets, and viral posts creates narratives that can significantly influence public opinion.

However, social media can also complicate matters. While it offers a platform for diverse opinions, it can also fuel misinformation and conspiracy theories. As the investigation into Hortman’s assassination unfolds, prioritizing accurate information over sensationalism will be crucial for news outlets and social media platforms alike.

Moving Forward

As the investigation continues, the political landscape in Minnesota is likely to be altered in unexpected ways. Lawmakers, constituents, and political commentators will be closely monitoring how this situation develops and what it means for future healthcare policy, immigration reform, and political discourse.

The legacy of Melissa Hortman will be remembered not just for her contributions to Minnesota politics but also for the circumstances surrounding her tragic death. This event serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of political polarization, emphasizing the importance of fostering respectful dialogue.

As more information about the investigation and potential motives behind her assassination comes to light, engaging in thoughtful discussions that honor her memory and reflect on the broader implications for democracy and public safety will be essential.

The assassination of Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman ignites a complex dialogue about politics, safety, and the ramifications of divisive rhetoric in modern society. Navigating this challenging landscape requires a focus on constructive discourse that promotes understanding and unity to ensure that such tragedies do not overshadow the democratic values we strive to uphold.

There is NO WAY it’s a coincidence that Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman, who was ass*ssinated this morning, just HAPPENED to be the sole democrat NO vote on free healthcare for illegals

NO WAY.

The REEKS of a political hit job. Luigi 2.0.
h/t @BreannaMorello pic.twitter.com/GW5QXCXVJO

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 14, 2025

The recent tragic assassination of Minnesota Representative Melissa Hortman has sent shockwaves throughout the political landscape. As the only democrat to vote against a bill proposing free healthcare for undocumented immigrants, her untimely death raises serious questions about the intersection of politics and violence. In this article, we will delve into the implications of this incident, explore the broader context of political disagreements, and examine how such events can shape public discourse.

Understanding the Political Climate

Politics in the United States has always been a contentious arena, but recent years have seen heightened tensions. The polarization among parties has created an environment where disagreements do not merely result in debates; they can lead to serious consequences, including violence. The assassination of Melissa Hortman is a stark reminder of how far political divisions can escalate.

The topic of healthcare for undocumented immigrants is particularly divisive. Proponents argue that access to healthcare is a fundamental human right, while opponents fear the financial implications for taxpayers. Hortman’s dissenting vote placed her at the center of a controversial issue, making her a target for those who opposed her stance.

The Role of Social Media in Shaping Opinions

In our digital age, social media platforms have become battlegrounds for political discourse. The tweet by Nick Sortor that sparked considerable discussion exemplifies how quickly information—and misinformation—can spread. With millions of users on platforms like Twitter, a single tweet can influence public perception and incite reactions.

Sortor’s assertion that the assassination “REEKS of a political hit job” is indicative of a growing trend where social media users are quick to jump to conclusions. This kind of rhetoric can lead to the further division of opinions and can even incite violence among those who feel strongly about political issues. The role of social media in amplifying political sentiments cannot be overstated.

The Concept of Political Assassination

Political assassination is not a new phenomenon. Throughout history, there have been numerous examples where political figures have been targeted due to their beliefs or actions. The assassination of Melissa Hortman raises questions about whether we are witnessing the emergence of a new wave of political violence.

In such cases, scholars and political analysts often look for patterns. Is this an isolated incident, or does it signify a trend in which dissenting voices are silenced? The fear of political assassination can deter individuals from expressing their views, leading to a chilling effect on free speech.

The Consequences of Political violence

The implications of political violence extend beyond the immediate tragedy. The assassination of a public figure can create an atmosphere of fear among lawmakers and their constituents. It raises questions about the safety of elected officials and can discourage citizens from engaging in political processes.

Furthermore, when political violence occurs, it can shift the focus of public discourse. Instead of discussing policy and governance, the conversation often turns to security and fear. This shift can hinder meaningful dialogue on important issues, such as healthcare reform.

Examining Healthcare Policies

The debate over healthcare for undocumented immigrants is multifaceted. In the case of Minnesota, the proposed bill aimed to provide free healthcare to all residents, regardless of immigration status. Supporters argue that providing healthcare is not only a moral obligation but also a public health necessity. In contrast, opponents express concerns over the financial burden on taxpayers and the potential for abuse of the system.

Hortman’s opposition to the bill, as the only democrat to vote against it, positioned her as a controversial figure. Her assassination raises important questions about the nature of political dissent and the consequences of taking a stand on contentious issues.

The Dangers of Political Polarization

Political polarization is a growing concern in the United States. As parties become more entrenched in their ideologies, the ability to engage in constructive dialogue diminishes. This polarization can lead to a lack of understanding and empathy between opposing sides, fostering an environment where violence becomes a possible outcome.

The assassination of a lawmaker, particularly over a divisive issue like healthcare, serves as a grim reminder of the consequences of such polarization. It challenges us to rethink how we engage in political discourse and consider the ramifications of our words and actions.

The Impact on Future Legislation

The assassination of Melissa Hortman will undoubtedly impact how future legislation is approached. Lawmakers may become more cautious in their decision-making, fearing for their safety or the potential backlash from constituents. This can lead to a stagnation in progress, as politicians may shy away from addressing controversial topics.

Moreover, the fear of violence can create an environment where only the most extreme voices are heard. Moderate perspectives may be drowned out, leading to an even greater divide within the political landscape.

Moving Forward: A Call for Change

In light of recent events, it is crucial for society to reflect on the current political climate. As citizens, we must advocate for a more civil discourse that encourages understanding and respect for differing opinions. This means moving beyond sensationalist narratives and engaging in thoughtful discussions about the issues that matter.

Additionally, there must be a concerted effort to address the root causes of political violence. This includes examining the role of social media in shaping opinions and the potential for inciting violence through incendiary rhetoric.

The Role of Lawmakers

Lawmakers have a responsibility to foster a safe environment for political discourse. This includes not only protecting themselves but also ensuring that their constituents feel safe to express their beliefs. The assassination of a public figure like Melissa Hortman underscores the need for enhanced security measures and support systems for elected officials.

Moreover, politicians must engage with their constituents in meaningful ways. Town hall meetings, community forums, and open discussions can help bridge the gap between differing viewpoints. By creating spaces for dialogue, lawmakers can work to reduce tensions and promote understanding.

Conclusion: A Call for Unity

The assassination of Minnesota Representative Melissa Hortman serves as a tragic reminder of the dangers of political polarization and violence. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is essential to prioritize civil discourse and seek common ground. By fostering an environment where differing opinions can be expressed safely, we can work towards a brighter future for our democracy.

In a time when political divisions seem insurmountable, let us come together to advocate for a more compassionate and understanding society. Through dialogue and collaboration, we can honor the legacy of those who have lost their lives in the line of political service and strive for a better tomorrow.

There is NO WAY it’s a coincidence that Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman, who was ass*ssinated this morning, just HAPPENED to be the sole democrat NO vote on free healthcare for illegals

NO WAY.

The REEKS of a political hit job. Luigi 2.0.
h/t @BreannaMorello

news/” target=”_blank”>Minnesota Rep. Hortman’s Assassination: Chilling Coincidence? political assassination theories, healthcare policy debates, Minnesota political news