Analyzing Public Sentiment: Concerns Over Hosting International Events in the U.S.

On June 11, 2025, a tweet from Kris in Hawaii sparked a significant discussion about the United States’ capability to host international events. The tweet expressed a strong sentiment that the U.S. is currently unfit to host such gatherings due to its perceived transformation into a "fascist, militarized police state." This statement raises several critical points that merit exploration, including the implications of political climate on international relations, public safety concerns, and the importance of maintaining a global reputation.

The Context of the Statement

Kris’s tweet reflects a growing unease among certain segments of the population regarding the current political and social climate in the U.S. The term "fascist" suggests a government characterized by authoritarianism, suppression of dissent, and a strong emphasis on nationalism. The phrase "militarized police state" implies an increasing use of military tactics and equipment by domestic law enforcement agencies, which can lead to heightened tensions between citizens and authorities. This perception can have far-reaching effects on how the U.S. is viewed by the international community, particularly when it comes to hosting events that require global cooperation and goodwill.

The Impact of Political Climate on International Events

International events, whether they be sporting competitions, cultural festivals, or diplomatic summits, often rely on a host nation’s ability to provide a safe and welcoming environment for attendees from various backgrounds. The concerns raised in Kris’s tweet resonate with those who believe that a militarized police presence can deter participation and undermine the spirit of cooperation that such events aim to promote.

As countries look to host international gatherings, they typically assess factors such as safety, security, and the overall health of civil liberties. If the U.S. is perceived as a nation where dissent is not tolerated and where civil rights are under threat, it can lead to reluctance among other nations to participate in events held on U.S. soil. This perception can result in decreased tourism, lost economic opportunities, and a tarnished global reputation.

Public Safety Concerns

Public safety is an essential consideration for any international event. The presence of militarized police can create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation, especially for marginalized groups and those who might oppose government policies. Such an environment could lead to protests or civil unrest, which not only endangers participants but also distracts from the purpose of the event.

Kris’s assertion underscores the need for host countries to ensure that all participants feel safe and respected. In an era where issues of racial justice, civil rights, and freedom of speech are at the forefront of national conversations, it becomes increasingly important for the U.S. to demonstrate a commitment to these values—not just domestically, but on a global stage.

The Importance of Global Reputation

The United States has historically positioned itself as a leader in promoting democracy, human rights, and international cooperation. However, the perception of the U.S. as a "fascist, militarized police state" challenges this narrative. If the U.S. wishes to maintain its role as a global leader, it must address these concerns head-on and work to rebuild trust both domestically and internationally.

International events often serve as a platform for countries to showcase their culture, values, and commitment to global issues. If the U.S. appears unwilling or unable to uphold the principles of democracy and human rights, it risks losing its influence in international affairs. Other nations may begin to question the reliability of the U.S. as a partner, leading to a potential decline in diplomatic and economic relationships.

Moving Forward: The Need for Change

In light of the concerns expressed in Kris’s tweet, it is imperative for U.S. leaders to engage in meaningful dialogue about the state of civil liberties and the role of law enforcement. Addressing these issues not only benefits the citizens of the United States but also reassures the global community that the U.S. is a safe and hospitable place for international events.

To enhance its reputation and ensure the successful hosting of future international events, the U.S. could consider several strategies:

1. Enhancing Transparency: The government should prioritize transparency in its law enforcement practices, ensuring that citizens and international visitors feel safe and protected.
2. Promoting Civil Liberties: Upholding and promoting civil liberties can help to counteract perceptions of authoritarianism. This includes protecting the right to protest and ensuring that all voices are heard.
3. Engaging with the Community: Building trust between law enforcement and communities can foster a sense of safety and cooperation, essential for hosting international events.
4. Highlighting Positive Developments: The U.S. should actively showcase its commitment to democracy, inclusion, and human rights on the international stage, reinforcing its image as a leader in these areas.
   

   Conclusion
   

   The tweet from Kris in Hawaii serves as a powerful reminder of the challenges facing the United States in its efforts to host international events. Concerns over the nation’s political climate, perceived militarization of law enforcement, and the state of civil liberties are critical issues that must be addressed. By taking proactive measures to ensure safety, promote civil rights, and engage with both domestic and international communities, the U.S. can work towards restoring its reputation as a welcoming and capable host for future international events. Ultimately, fostering an environment of trust and cooperation is essential for the U.S. to remain a key player on the global stage.

They need to start making plans to pull this event from the US. We are not capable of hosting an international event because we are now a fascist, militarized police state.

— Kris in Hawaii (@krisinhawaii) June 11, 2025

They need to start making plans to pull this event from the US. We are not capable of hosting an international event because we are now a fascist, militarized police state.

This bold statement by Kris in Hawaii captures a growing sentiment among many Americans who feel that the nation is no longer a suitable host for international events. The phrase “fascist, militarized police state” resonates deeply with those concerned about civil liberties, law enforcement overreach, and the overall state of democracy in the United States. As we delve into this topic, we’ll explore the implications of such a viewpoint and what it means for America’s role on the global stage.

The Rise of Authoritarianism in America

When discussing the notion of the United States as a “fascist, militarized police state,” it’s essential to examine the factors that contribute to this perception. Over the past few years, there has been a visible uptick in militarization among police forces across the country. With the advent of advanced technology, law enforcement agencies have increasingly employed military-grade equipment, raising concerns about excessive force and the erosion of civil liberties. This trend has sparked a heated debate about the balance between public safety and individual rights.

Statistics reveal that police departments in many cities have received surplus military equipment from the Department of Defense, which has led to heightened tensions between law enforcement and communities. According to a report by the news/criminal-law-reform/2021/06/militarization-of-policing-in-the-us/”>ACLU, this militarization has created an environment where communities feel threatened rather than protected. This shift in the relationship between law enforcement and the public fosters a sense of distrust, which can have far-reaching consequences for the social fabric of the nation.

Impact on International Relations and Events

International events are often seen as opportunities to showcase a country’s values, culture, and stability. When voices like Kris in Hawaii call for pulling events from the US, it raises eyebrows and questions about America’s reputation on the global stage. The fear is that perceived authoritarianism could deter international organizations from choosing the US as a host for significant events, such as summits, conferences, and sporting competitions.

In recent years, the world has witnessed countries hosting international events under intense scrutiny. For example, the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing faced criticism for human rights violations, which led many to question the legitimacy of hosting such a prestigious event there. Similarly, if international bodies perceive the US as a “fascist, militarized police state,” they may hesitate to engage with the country on significant issues or consider it as a venue for future events.

The Role of Social Media in Amplifying Concerns

Social media platforms have become a powerful tool for individuals to express their views and rally support for various causes. Kris in Hawaii’s tweet is a prime example of how social media can amplify concerns and spark a broader conversation. With the ability to reach millions in seconds, tweets like this can shape public discourse and influence perceptions about national identity and governance.

Moreover, platforms like Twitter have allowed grassroots movements to gain traction, as individuals rally around shared concerns about civil liberties and governmental authority. This new age of digital activism is reshaping how people engage with political issues and mobilize for change. The concern voiced by Kris is not an isolated sentiment; it’s part of a larger conversation happening across various social media platforms, reflecting a collective anxiety about the direction of the country.

The Consequences of Ignoring Civil Liberties

Ignoring the erosion of civil liberties can have dire consequences for any nation. When citizens feel that their rights are compromised, it can lead to widespread disillusionment and disengagement from the political process. A thriving democracy relies on active and informed citizen participation, and when people lose faith in their government, they may withdraw from civic engagement altogether.

Furthermore, the consequences extend beyond domestic politics; they impact international relations as well. Countries that prioritize human rights and democratic values are often seen as more credible partners on the global stage. If the US continues to be viewed as a “militarized police state,” it risks losing its position as a leader in advocating for democracy and human rights worldwide.

The Need for Dialogue and Reform

In light of these concerns, it’s crucial for citizens, lawmakers, and leaders to engage in meaningful dialogue about the state of civil liberties in the United States. Reforming policing practices, ensuring accountability, and fostering community engagement are essential steps toward rebuilding trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve.

Organizations like the ACLU are instrumental in advocating for reforms that protect individual rights. Their efforts to challenge unjust practices and promote transparency in law enforcement are vital for restoring faith in the system. The conversation initiated by Kris in Hawaii serves as a reminder that citizens have a role to play in demanding accountability and change.

Creating a Vision for the Future

As we consider the implications of labeling the US as a “fascist, militarized police state,” it’s essential to articulate a vision for the future that prioritizes democracy, civil liberties, and community engagement. By fostering an environment where open dialogue is encouraged, citizens can work together to create a society that values both safety and individual rights.

Moreover, engaging with international partners and promoting collaboration can help the US reclaim its position as a responsible global leader. Hosting international events can be an opportunity to showcase the nation’s commitment to democratic values and human rights, provided that the necessary reforms are undertaken to address the concerns raised by citizens like Kris in Hawaii.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

In conclusion, the assertion that “they need to start making plans to pull this event from the US” reflects a deep-seated concern about the current state of civil liberties and governance in the United States. It calls for urgent attention to the issues of police militarization and authoritarianism, urging citizens and leaders alike to engage in meaningful discussions about reform and accountability.

The road ahead may be challenging, but by fostering dialogue and advocating for change, we can strive to create a society that values democracy, individual rights, and the principles of justice. The voices of citizens like Kris in Hawaii are essential in shaping this future, reminding us that we must hold our leaders accountable and work collectively toward a better tomorrow.