Infantryman Calls ICE a Domestic Threat: UCMJ Violation? — Julian Franklin controversy, National Guard UCMJ violation, ICE domestic threat claims
Julian Franklin National Guard, ICE domestic threat controversy, UCMJ chain of command violation
BREAKING – This man, Julian Franklin, who claims to be a National Guard infantryman, now says ICE is a domestic threat, directly violating the UCMJ by undermining the chain of command.
Let’s make him famous. pic.twitter.com/MQkTpWJtcT
— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) August 21, 2025
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
BREAKING – This man, Julian Franklin, who claims to be a National Guard infantryman, now says ICE is a domestic threat, directly violating the UCMJ by undermining the chain of command.
The recent statement made by Julian Franklin has sparked significant debate regarding the role of ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) in American society. Franklin’s assertion that ICE poses a domestic threat raises questions about national security and civil rights. Many people are concerned about the implications such statements have on the perception of law enforcement agencies.
Franklin’s claims, if true, highlight serious concerns regarding the balance between national security and personal liberties. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is designed to maintain order and discipline within the military, and undermining the chain of command can lead to severe consequences. This raises the question: what does it mean for a National Guard member to challenge a federal agency openly?
In light of these developments, it’s essential to examine the broader context of ICE’s role in the United States. Critics argue that ICE has engaged in practices that could be seen as overreach, impacting communities across the nation. Supporters, however, believe that ICE is crucial for maintaining law and order, especially regarding immigration enforcement.
The call to “make him famous” suggests a desire to elevate Franklin’s claims into the public discourse, urging individuals to consider the implications of his statements. Engaging in this conversation can help foster understanding and debate around the responsibilities of government agencies and the rights of citizens.
As this story continues to unfold, it’s vital to stay informed and consider all perspectives surrounding the actions and responsibilities of agencies like ICE. The dialogue surrounding Julian Franklin’s claims will likely influence public opinion and policy discussions moving forward.