mail-in voting integrity, election law authority, Trump voting claims

BREAKING: Josh Shapiro didn’t nibble. He said it plain. A president cannot erase mail-in ballots with a pen. States run elections. Congress sets the federal rules. The military, seniors, and working parents use vote by mail because it works. Trump is selling fantasy. Courts will… pic.twitter.com/Dd3mOHTxWm

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

— Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) August 20, 2025

BREAKING: Josh Shapiro didn’t nibble. He said it plain.

In a recent statement, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro made it clear: “A president cannot erase mail-in ballots with a pen.” This assertion highlights the important distinction between state and federal powers in overseeing elections. Shapiro emphasizes that states run elections, while Congress is responsible for setting the federal rules. This clarification is crucial in understanding the ongoing debates surrounding voting rights and election integrity.

A president cannot erase mail-in ballots with a pen.

Mail-in voting has become a vital tool for many Americans, including military personnel, seniors, and working parents. Shapiro’s comments reinforce the notion that mail-in voting is an effective and reliable method for casting ballots. By stating that “it works,” he acknowledges the benefits of this system in ensuring that all eligible voters have the opportunity to participate in the democratic process.

States run elections.

The decentralized nature of the U.S. election system means that individual states maintain control over how elections are conducted. This structure allows for flexibility and adaptation to local needs, but it also means that any sweeping changes suggested at the federal level must be approached with caution. Shapiro’s remarks serve as a reminder that states have the authority to determine their own voting processes, including the use of mail-in ballots.

Trump is selling fantasy.

Critics of former President Donald Trump argue that his rhetoric surrounding mail-in voting often misrepresents the realities of the election process. By labeling his claims as “fantasy,” Shapiro invites a broader conversation about misinformation in politics and the importance of grounding electoral discussions in fact-based evidence.

Courts will…

As these debates continue, the role of the judiciary becomes increasingly significant. Courts will be tasked with interpreting laws surrounding voting and ensuring that citizens’ rights are protected. Shapiro’s comments signal a call to action for both lawmakers and voters to stay informed and engaged in the electoral process.