The Biden administration allegedly pressured major banks, including Chase and Bank of America, to cut ties with former President Donald trump after his presidency, according to sources cited by the New York Post. A JPMorgan executive reportedly stated that Biden’s regulators instilled a sense of fear among banks regarding business dealings with Trump. This revelation has sparked discussions about retribution and the extent of governmental influence over financial institutions. The claims highlight ongoing tensions between the Biden administration and Trump supporters, as well as concerns about the politicization of banking practices in the United States.

BREAKING: The Biden regime PRESSURED Chase and Bank of America to DE-BANK Trump after he left office, sources tell NYP

A JPMorgan executive said Biden’s regulators “put the fear of God in you if you did business” with people like Trump

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

TIME FOR RETRIBUTION!

They went BEYOND… pic.twitter.com/zBYGr667WK

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) August 5, 2025

BREAKING: The Biden Regime PRESSURED Chase and Bank of America to DE-BANK Trump After He Left Office

Have you heard the latest buzz? Sources are revealing that the Biden administration allegedly pressured major banks like Chase and Bank of America to cut ties with former President Donald Trump after he left office. This information comes from a report by the New York Post, shedding light on a controversial move that has sent shockwaves through the political and financial landscapes.

A JPMorgan Executive’s Bold Statement

A high-ranking executive from JPMorgan made a striking comment, stating that Biden’s regulators “put the fear of God in you if you did business” with individuals like Trump. This statement raises significant questions about the role of government in influencing private banking decisions. It suggests a level of intimidation that could alter the way financial institutions operate, especially when it comes to politically charged figures.

The implications of such actions are profound. If banks are indeed feeling pressure from regulators to distance themselves from certain clients, it could set a dangerous precedent for financial freedom and the ethics of banking practices. What happened to the principle of serving all customers equally, regardless of their political affiliations?

TIME FOR RETRIBUTION!

With these revelations, many are calling for retribution against what they perceive as a politically motivated attack on Trump’s financial interests. Supporters of the former president argue that this is not just about banking; it’s about a broader fight for free speech and the right to conduct business without government interference. The narrative is compelling, and it’s resonating with a significant portion of the population that feels targeted by the current administration.

The idea that institutions can be weaponized against individuals based on their political beliefs is alarming. It raises questions about the integrity of our financial systems and whether they can remain impartial in the face of political pressures. Could this be the beginning of a broader movement to reclaim that autonomy?

They Went BEYOND

The phrase “they went BEYOND” encapsulates the sentiment of those who feel that the Biden administration has overstepped its bounds. The idea that financial institutions would be pressured to de-bank a former president is unprecedented and suggests a shift toward a more adversarial relationship between government and business.

As this story unfolds, it’s crucial to stay informed and recognize the potential implications for all Americans. Are we witnessing a new era where financial institutions become tools for political agendas? Or is this merely a reaction to the unique circumstances surrounding Trump’s presidency and the controversies that followed?

In conclusion, the allegations surrounding the Biden administration’s influence on banks to de-bank Trump raise serious concerns about the intersection of finance and politics. As we navigate these turbulent waters, it’s essential to consider the broader ramifications for our democracy and the principles that underpin it.

Stay tuned, because this is a developing story that may continue to shape the conversation around political influence in the financial sector. For further details, you can read more about the unfolding situation in the original report [here](https://nypost.com).