The U.S. House has passed a significant rescission package aimed at defunding NPR, PBS, and USAID, with a narrow vote of 216-213. This pivotal legislation is now heading to President trump‘s desk for approval. Notably, two republican representatives, Brian Fitzpatrick and Mike Turner, broke ranks to vote against the package. The move has sparked debate regarding the funding of public broadcasting and international aid agencies. As discussions unfold, the implications of this decision may impact various sectors reliant on these funds. Stay informed about the latest political developments and their potential effects on media and aid programs.

BREAKING

• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

The rescission package is heading to President Trump’s desk, defunding NPR, PBS, and USAID.

U.S. House passes the package on a 216-213 vote, with two Republicans, Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick and Mike Turner, voting no.

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) July 18, 2025

BREAKING

Big news is making the rounds, and it’s all about the rescission package that’s just been passed by the U.S. House. This package is set to make its way to President Trump’s desk, and it’s stirring quite the conversation. Why? Because it aims to defund some major players: NPR, PBS, and USAID.

The Rescission Package Explained

So, what exactly is a rescission package? In simple terms, it’s a legislative proposal that seeks to cancel previously allocated federal spending. This particular package passed with a narrow margin of 216-213. It indicates a significant shift in how federal funds are being prioritized. The fact that it targets organizations like NPR and PBS — both known for their public broadcasting — raises numerous questions about the future of public media in the United States.

Who Voted and Why It Matters

In a surprising twist, two Republicans, Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick and Mike Turner, voted against the package. Their dissent highlights a divide even within the Republican party about the direction of federal funding and the role of public media. With the vote being so close, it’s clear that this issue is contentious and could have far-reaching implications for how Americans consume news and information.

Implications for NPR, PBS, and USAID

Defunding NPR and PBS means fewer resources for public broadcasting. These organizations have been vital for providing educational content and diverse programming. The potential loss of funding raises concerns about how these platforms will sustain their operations. Meanwhile, cutting funding to USAID could impact international aid efforts, affecting countless lives globally. This package is not just a political maneuver; it has real-world consequences that could alter how information is disseminated and how aid is provided.

Public Reaction and Future Outlook

Reactions to the news have been mixed. Supporters of the rescission package argue that it’s time to cut unnecessary spending and that taxpayer money should be allocated more effectively. On the other hand, critics believe that defunding these organizations undermines democracy and the informed citizenry that public broadcasting promotes. As this package heads to the president, it’s crucial to stay tuned for the next steps and how they will affect the landscape of public media and international aid.

Stay Informed

For those interested in the intricacies of federal spending and public media funding, keeping an eye on developments surrounding this rescission package is vital. It’s a clear reminder of how legislative decisions can ripple out to impact everyday life, making it essential for citizens to remain engaged and informed about their government’s actions.