Rand Paul Revives Criminal Referral: Fauci’s Autopen Pardon? — Rand Paul investigation update, Anthony Fauci testimony controversy, DOJ criminal referral news
Senator Rand Paul plans to reissue a criminal referral to the DOJ for Dr. Anthony Fauci, citing a late-night autopen signing of a pardon. Paul accuses Fauci of lying multiple times before Congress, characterizing his behavior as shaky and deceptive. This renewed push for accountability highlights ongoing controversies surrounding Fauci’s statements during the pandemic. The call for Fauci’s prosecution emphasizes the political divide on COVID-19 management and the trust in public health officials. The public discourse surrounding Fauci’s actions continues to spark debates about transparency and integrity in government. Stay informed on this developing story.
BREAKING: Rand Paul will be re-issuing his CRIMINAL REFERRAL to the DOJ for Anthony Fauci, after his “pardon” was confirmed to be issued by a late-night autopen
Fauci lied REPEATEDLY in front of Congress and shaking while doing so.
He’s guilty of perjury. LOCK HIM UP. pic.twitter.com/dmNSLnEClt
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 14, 2025
BREAKING: Rand Paul will be re-issuing his CRIMINAL REFERRAL to the DOJ for Anthony Fauci, after his “pardon” was confirmed to be issued by a late-night autopen
In an unexpected twist, Senator Rand Paul has announced his intention to re-issue a criminal referral to the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding Dr. Anthony Fauci. This decision comes on the heels of news that Fauci’s so-called “pardon” was signed using an autopen during the late-night hours, raising eyebrows and questions about its legitimacy. If you’re scratching your head wondering what’s going on, you’re not alone. This situation has stirred up a lot of debate online and in the political arena.
Fauci lied REPEATEDLY in front of Congress and shaking while doing so.
The allegations against Fauci have been serious, with claims that he lied repeatedly during his congressional testimony. Senator Paul has been a vocal critic of Fauci, alleging that the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) was not truthful about key aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic response. Many believe that these statements have serious implications, especially when it comes to public trust in health authorities. The fact that he appeared visibly shaken while testifying has only added fuel to the fire. If you want to dive deeper into the specifics of his statements and how they were perceived, you can check out more detailed analyses from sources like [The Hill](https://thehill.com).
He’s guilty of perjury. LOCK HIM UP.
The phrase “LOCK HIM UP” has become a rallying cry among some of Fauci’s critics, especially those in the republican party. Accusations of perjury are no light matter, and they could lead to serious consequences if proven true. The call for accountability is echoed by many who feel that transparency in government and health agencies is crucial for public confidence. As this situation unfolds, it raises critical questions about the responsibilities of public officials and the consequences of their actions. For those interested in legal ramifications, resources like [Justia](https://www.justia.com) offer insights into what perjury entails and the potential penalties involved.
With senator Paul pushing for action, this story is set to develop further. The political landscape is already charged, and the implications for both Fauci and the broader health community could be substantial. Public opinion is divided, and as more details emerge, it’s clear that this saga isn’t over yet. Whether you’re pro-Fauci or critical of his actions, one thing is certain: the dialogue surrounding public health leadership is more important than ever.
Stay tuned, as the repercussions of this criminal referral could lead to significant changes in how public health officials operate and are held accountable in the future. It’s a pivotal moment for American politics and public health, and it’s one that will likely be discussed for years to come.