Breaking news: Protest at Swiss Diplomatic Event

On July 8, 2025, a significant protest occurred during a speech by Thomas Gürber, the Swiss Deputy state Secretary of Foreign Affairs. The event, which aimed to discuss international diplomatic relations, was interrupted when two activists, including a prominent figure known on social media as @awawawhoami, staged a protest on stage. The activists carried a sign that boldly declared, "No tech for genocide," capturing the immediate attention of all attendees and onlookers.

The Message Behind the Protest

As Gürber spoke, the activists chanted powerful slogans such as "No tech for genocide / you are all complicit" and "Free, free Palestine." The protest highlighted the activists’ stance against the use of technology in warfare and its implications for human rights, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflict in Palestine. Their message was clear: they believe that technological advancements should not contribute to violence or oppression, and they called for accountability from those who develop and supply such technologies.

The Role of Technology in Modern Conflicts

The protest raised critical questions about the role of technology in contemporary warfare. With advancements in surveillance, drones, and other military technologies, the potential for misuse in conflicts has increased. Activists argue that companies and governments involved in developing these technologies bear responsibility for their impact on civilian populations, especially in areas experiencing conflict.

This incident underscores a growing movement among activists and human rights organizations that demands transparency and ethical considerations in the development and deployment of military technologies. The protesters emphasized that allowing technology to be used for oppressive purposes makes all involved complicit in the consequences.

Activism in the Digital Age

The protest was not only a physical demonstration but also a reflection of the power of social media in contemporary activism. The presence of the activist known as @awawawhoami signifies the intersection of social media and on-ground activism, where online platforms serve as vital tools for mobilization and awareness. This incident quickly gained traction on various social media platforms, with many users sharing the protest’s message and calling for further discussions on the ethical implications of technology in warfare.

International Reactions

In the wake of the protest, reactions from both the public and officials varied. Supporters of the protest praised the activists for their courage and determination to speak out against perceived injustices. Many echoed the sentiments of the slogans, reinforcing the need for ethical oversight in technology development.

Conversely, some officials criticized the disruption of the diplomatic event, arguing that it detracted from important discussions on international relations. However, the protest successfully highlighted an urgent issue that continues to resonate globally: the intersection of technology, warfare, and human rights.

The Implications for Future Diplomacy

This protest serves as a reminder of the challenges that diplomats and policymakers face in addressing complex global issues. As technology continues to evolve, so too does the need for comprehensive frameworks that govern its use, especially in conflict zones. The call for accountability and ethical considerations in technology development is now more relevant than ever.

Policymakers must recognize the voices of activists and the public’s concerns regarding the implications of technology in warfare. Engaging with these issues is essential for fostering trust and ensuring that technological advancements are harnessed for peace rather than conflict.

Conclusion: A Call for Ethical Technology Use

The protest led by Thomas Gürber’s speech is a vivid example of how activism can challenge established norms and provoke critical discussions on pressing global issues. The slogans "No tech for genocide" and "Free, free Palestine" resonate with a growing movement advocating for the ethical use of technology in all sectors, particularly in military applications.

This incident serves as a call to action for governments, tech companies, and civil society to collaborate in creating frameworks that prioritize human rights and ethical considerations in technology development. As the world grapples with the complex interplay between technology and conflict, it is imperative that all stakeholders engage in meaningful dialogue to ensure that technology serves as a tool for progress and peace, rather than a catalyst for violence and oppression.

In summary, the protest at the diplomatic event in Switzerland is a powerful reminder of the ongoing struggles for justice and accountability in today’s world. It emphasizes the necessity for a collective effort to address the ethical implications of technology in warfare, advocating for a future where technology is used to support and uplift humanity rather than exacerbate suffering and conflict.

BREAKING: as Thomas Gürber, Swiss Deputy State Secretary of Foreign Affairs, spoke, two actionists — one of whom is @awawawhoami — walked on stage with a sign saying “no tech for genocide.”

they chanted: “no tech for genocide / you are all complicit” and “free, free Palestine.” pic.twitter.com/x9LOp58Hks

— ryan fae (@RhinozzCode) July 8, 2025

BREAKING: as Thomas Gürber, Swiss Deputy State Secretary of Foreign Affairs, spoke, two actionists — one of whom is @awawawhoami — walked on stage with a sign saying “no tech for genocide.”

In a recent event that captured global attention, two actionists made a bold statement during a speech by Swiss Deputy State Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Thomas Gürber. As Gürber addressed the audience, the actionists took to the stage, holding a sign that read “no tech for genocide.” This moment was not just about a protest; it was a passionate plea for accountability in the tech industry regarding its role in conflicts, particularly in relation to the ongoing situation in Palestine.

they chanted: “no tech for genocide / you are all complicit” and “free, free Palestine.”

The protesters chanted phrases that echoed through the venue: “no tech for genocide / you are all complicit” and “free, free Palestine.” These chants weren’t just random slogans; they encapsulated a growing concern among activists about the complicity of technology companies in conflicts that lead to humanitarian crises. For many, the use of technology in warfare raises ethical questions about responsibility and the impact of technological advancements on civilian lives.

The actionists, one of whom is known on social media as @awawawhoami, highlighted a crucial issue that is often overlooked in discussions about technology. The intersection of technology and warfare is increasingly relevant in today’s world, where digital tools can be used for both good and ill. Their actions were a call to action for individuals and corporations alike to reconsider their roles in global conflicts.

Understanding the Context: Switzerland’s Role

Switzerland has long positioned itself as a neutral country, often acting as a mediator in international conflicts. However, the impact of its technological exports and the actions of Swiss companies abroad cannot be ignored. The protest during Gürber’s speech serves as a reminder that even nations with a reputation for neutrality have a role to play in addressing issues of human rights and conflict.

The Swiss government has been involved in discussions about the ethical implications of technology used in warfare. With companies that manufacture surveillance equipment and military technology based in Switzerland, the ethical considerations surrounding these products are increasingly being scrutinized. Activists argue that technology should not be used to perpetrate violence or support oppressive regimes.

The Role of Technology in Conflict

The phrase “no tech for genocide” resonates deeply within the context of modern warfare. Technology has transformed the battlefield in ways that were unimaginable just a few decades ago. From drones to cyber warfare, the implications of technological advancements in military applications have prompted debates about ethics, responsibility, and accountability.

As technology becomes more integrated into military operations, the risks of misuse and abuse also increase. The call for “no tech for genocide” emphasizes the need for stricter regulations and accountability measures in the tech industry. Companies must be held responsible for how their technologies are used and by whom. The protestors’ message is clear: silence and complicity are not acceptable.

Amplifying Voices: The Importance of Activism

Activism plays a vital role in shaping public discourse and influencing policy. The actions of the protestors at the event serve as a reminder of the power of grassroots movements and the importance of standing up for human rights. By using their voices and visibility, activists can bring attention to pressing issues and hold those in power accountable.

In a world where information flows rapidly, social media platforms have become a critical tool for activists to spread their messages. The protest led by @awawawhoami and their fellow actionist was amplified by social media, allowing their message to reach a broader audience. This highlights the importance of digital platforms in modern activism, as they provide a means for individuals to share their experiences and advocate for change.

The Human Cost of Conflict

When discussing technology and genocide, it’s essential to remember the human cost of conflicts. The situation in Palestine, for instance, has seen countless lives affected by violence and oppression. The chants for “free Palestine” reflect not just a political stance, but a demand for justice and respect for human rights.

Understanding the impact of technology on human lives is crucial in the discourse surrounding conflict. It’s not just about the technology itself, but the consequences it has on real people. As activists push for accountability, they are also advocating for the protection of vulnerable populations who are often the first victims of technological misuse in warfare.

What Happens Next?

The event featuring Thomas Gürber and the subsequent protest raises important questions about the future of technology in warfare and the responsibilities of tech companies. As more activists speak out against the complicity of corporations in conflicts, it will be interesting to see how governments and businesses respond.

Will there be a shift in policy that prioritizes ethical considerations in technology development? Will companies begin to take a stand against the use of their products in conflict situations? The actions of the protestors serve as a catalyst for these discussions, urging society to confront the uncomfortable truths about technology and its implications.

Conclusion: The Call for Accountability

The protest at the recent event serves as a powerful reminder of the need for accountability in the tech industry. As technology continues to evolve, it is imperative that we consider the ethical implications of its use in warfare. The message that “no tech for genocide” resonates not only in Switzerland but across the globe, urging us all to reflect on our roles and responsibilities in the face of injustice.

By amplifying voices and advocating for change, activists are paving the way for a more ethical and responsible approach to technology in conflict. The chants for “free Palestine” and the call for accountability echo in a world that is increasingly interconnected, reminding us that we all have a stake in the fight for human rights and dignity.