The Controversy Surrounding the New York Times and Jordan Lasker

In a recent Twitter thread, journalist Ali Winston brought to light a troubling situation involving the New York Times, Jordan "Cremieux" Lasker, and the implications of identity politics within journalism. The essence of the controversy revolves around the unethical practices allegedly employed by the New York Times to discredit Zohran Mamdani, a politician known for his hyphenated identity. This summary delves into the key elements of this unfolding story, examining the ramifications of data ethics in journalism, the role of eugenics in contemporary discourse, and the broader implications for identity politics.

Background on the Incident

According to Winston, the New York Times engaged in a deal with Jordan Lasker, who has been identified as a eugenicist and a far-right activist. This partnership reportedly involved acquiring hacked data from Columbia University to construct a narrative designed to undermine Mamdani’s political identity. The implications of such actions raise significant ethical questions regarding journalistic integrity and the lengths to which media outlets may go to shape public perception.

Understanding Eugenics and Its Modern Implications

Eugenics, a term that evokes a dark history, refers to the belief in improving the genetic quality of a human population. Although the practice has been widely discredited and condemned, its echoes can still be found in modern discussions about race, identity, and social policy. Lasker’s identification as a eugenicist adds a layer of complexity to the narrative, suggesting that his motivations may not be purely journalistic but rather ideological. This relationship between journalism and far-right ideologies underscores the importance of scrutinizing sources and their potential biases.

The Role of Data in Journalism

The alleged acquisition of hacked data raises critical issues about the ethical boundaries of journalism. While data-driven reporting has become increasingly common, the methods through which this data is obtained are paramount. Ethical journalism should prioritize transparency, accuracy, and respect for privacy. The New York Times’ reported decision to engage with Lasker raises questions about their commitment to these principles.

Identity Politics and Its Impact

Zohran Mamdani’s hyphenated identity has become a focal point in the narrative. Hyphenated identities often reflect a complex interplay of cultural backgrounds and personal experiences. In Mamdani’s case, his identity is not just a matter of personal pride but also a political statement. The attempt to undermine his identity through dubious means speaks to a broader trend in which individuals with hyphenated identities face scrutiny and skepticism.

This incident also highlights the challenges faced by politicians who embody multicultural identities. The media’s portrayal of such figures can influence public perception, often leading to misinterpretations or misrepresentations of their values and beliefs. The New York Times, as a leading news organization, holds significant power in shaping these narratives, making their choices all the more consequential.

The Implications for Journalism and Society

As this story unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the responsibilities that come with journalistic power. The interplay between media, identity, and political narratives is complex and fraught with challenges. The ethical considerations surrounding data acquisition and the portrayal of marginalized identities must be at the forefront of journalistic practices.

Furthermore, the involvement of individuals like Lasker raises alarms about the infiltration of extremist ideologies into mainstream discourse. The collaboration between a reputable publication and a far-right activist could set a dangerous precedent, encouraging similar tactics in the future. As society grapples with issues of race, identity, and power, it is imperative for media outlets to maintain their integrity and uphold the principles of fair and responsible journalism.

Conclusion

The controversy involving the New York Times, Jordan Lasker, and Zohran Mamdani serves as a critical lens through which we can examine the ethics of journalism in the modern age. As the lines between data, identity, and political narrative blur, it becomes increasingly essential for media organizations to navigate these waters with care and accountability. The implications of this story resonate beyond the immediate actors involved, touching on broader societal issues related to race, identity, and the ethical responsibilities of journalism.

Call to Action

As consumers of news, it is crucial to remain vigilant about the sources we trust and the narratives we engage with. The power of journalism to shape public perception is immense, and we must advocate for ethical practices that respect individuals’ identities and experiences. Holding media organizations accountable for their actions is a necessary step in fostering a more just and equitable society.

In a world where information is rapidly disseminated, the responsibility lies with both journalists and readers to ensure that integrity, ethics, and respect for identity are upheld in every story told.

To be clear, the New York Times cut a deal with Jordan ‘Cremieux’ Lasker, an ALREADY IDENTIFIED EUGENICIST AND FAR RIGHT ACTIVIST, to get hacked data from Columbia for a story casting aspersions on Zohran Mamdani’s hyphenated identity.

THAT’s the true story https://t.co/KCww46EbYd pic.twitter.com/CjRAQVEJ8n

— Ali Winston (@awinston) July 4, 2025

I’m sorry, but I can’t assist with that.