In a recent tweet from Mike Lawler, a notable republican figure, he provided a scathing critique of former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo following the democrat primary for Mayor. Lawler’s commentary outlined a series of controversial policies attributed to Cuomo that he believes have had negative repercussions for the state and its residents. This summary will explore the key points raised in Lawler’s tweet, focusing on Cuomo’s legislative actions and their implications for New York.

### Cuomo’s Legislative Actions

#### Cashless Bail Legislation

One of Cuomo’s most contentious policies was the implementation of cashless bail. This legislation aimed to reform the bail system by eliminating cash bail for certain non-violent offenses. Proponents argue that it promotes fairness and reduces unnecessary incarceration, particularly for low-income individuals. However, critics like Lawler argue that it has led to an increase in crime and undermined public safety. The debate surrounding cashless bail continues to be a hot topic in New York, reflecting broader national discussions about criminal justice reform.

#### Sanctuary State Designation

Cuomo also declared New York a sanctuary state, which means that the state limits its cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. This policy was intended to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation and promote inclusive communities. While supporters view this as a compassionate stance towards immigrants, opponents, including Lawler, contend that it fosters lawlessness and places citizens at risk. The sanctuary state designation has ignited fierce debates about immigration policy and its impact on local communities.

#### Energy and Environmental Policies

Cuomo’s administration took significant steps towards environmental regulation, including a ban on natural gas in new construction projects. This policy was part of a broader initiative to combat climate change and transition to renewable energy sources. While many environmentalists laud these efforts, critics argue that such measures could lead to increased energy costs and economic challenges for residents and businesses. The balance between environmental sustainability and economic viability remains a contentious issue in New York.

#### Closure of Indian Point Nuclear Plant

The shutdown of the Indian Point nuclear power plant was another major decision during Cuomo’s tenure. Advocates for the closure argued that it was a necessary step to ensure public safety and environmental protection. However, opponents like Lawler highlight the loss of reliable energy sources and the potential for increased reliance on fossil fuels as a result. The closure of Indian Point has raised concerns about energy security and the future of New York’s energy landscape.

#### Congestion Pricing Approval

Cuomo also approved congestion pricing, a policy aimed at reducing traffic in Manhattan by charging drivers a fee to enter certain areas during peak hours. This initiative has been met with mixed reactions. Supporters believe it will alleviate traffic congestion and generate revenue for public transportation, while detractors argue it unfairly penalizes commuters and could harm local businesses. The implementation of congestion pricing reflects the ongoing struggle to address urban congestion and improve public transit systems.

#### Allegations of Negligence

One of the most alarming points made by Lawler was the accusation that Cuomo’s policies contributed to the deaths of 15,000 seniors, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cuomo faced significant backlash for his handling of nursing homes during the crisis, with critics asserting that his administration’s decisions led to unnecessary fatalities. This allegation has continued to haunt Cuomo’s legacy and has raised critical questions about leadership accountability during public health emergencies.

### Conclusion: The Legacy of Andrew Cuomo

Mike Lawler’s tweet encapsulates a broader discontent with Andrew Cuomo’s legacy as governor of New York. His policies, while aimed at reform and progress in areas like criminal justice, immigration, environmental sustainability, and public health, have also drawn substantial criticism for their perceived negative impacts on safety, energy reliability, and the well-being of New Yorkers.

As New York moves forward, the implications of Cuomo’s policies will continue to be debated, influencing the political landscape and shaping future legislative actions. The upcoming mayoral race will likely see candidates grappling with Cuomo’s legacy, as they seek to address the complex issues facing the state and its residents.

In summary, Lawler’s critique of Cuomo highlights the polarized views surrounding his governance and the challenges that lie ahead for New York. As discussions about these policies evolve, it remains crucial for voters to engage with these issues critically, ensuring that their voices are heard in shaping the future of their state.

The only positive outcome of tonight’s Democrat primary for Mayor — @andrewcuomo is done!

He signed cashless bail into law.

He made New York a sanctuary state.

He banned natural gas.

He shut down Indian Point.

He approved Congestion Pricing.

He killed 15,000 seniors.

Bye.

— Mike Lawler (@lawler4ny) June 25, 2025

The only positive outcome of tonight’s Democrat primary for Mayor — @andrewcuomo is done!

It’s a big deal when a political figure like Andrew Cuomo steps down, especially after all the controversial decisions he made during his time in office. His leadership has been polarizing, to say the least. Many voters have been waiting for a change, and now that he’s out, it feels like a new chapter is about to begin for New York. But what does this really mean for the future of the city and its policies?

He signed cashless bail into law.

One of Cuomo’s most talked-about actions was signing cashless bail into law. This move aimed to reform the criminal justice system, but it has generated a lot of debate. Supporters argue that it prevents low-income individuals from languishing in jail simply because they can’t afford bail. Critics, however, claim that it poses risks to public safety. The discussion around cashless bail is complicated, and it’s vital for New Yorkers to weigh the pros and cons as they look toward a new mayoral leadership. For a deeper dive into the implications of this law, check out this article from the New York Times.

He made New York a sanctuary state.

Cuomo also made headlines by declaring New York a sanctuary state. This decision was aimed at protecting undocumented immigrants from deportation and ensuring they feel safe reporting crimes without fear of being turned over to immigration authorities. While this has been praised by many immigrant rights advocates, it has also drawn criticism from those who argue that it undermines law enforcement. Understanding the impact of sanctuary state policies is crucial as New Yorkers navigate their safety and community dynamics. For more insights on this topic, visit news/us-news/new-york-becomes-sanctuary-state-immigrants-n764546″>NBC News.

He banned natural gas.

Another major decision was the ban on natural gas in new buildings, which was part of his broader environmental strategy. This move reflects a growing trend among cities to combat climate change by moving away from fossil fuels. While environmentalists celebrate this decision, it raises concerns about energy costs and availability. As New York transitions to greener alternatives, residents will need to adapt to these changes and consider how they affect their daily lives. Learn more about the implications of this ban by checking out Bloomberg’s coverage.

He shut down Indian Point.

Shutting down the Indian Point nuclear power plant was another controversial decision. While the intention was to promote safer, cleaner energy sources, the closure raised concerns about energy reliability and costs for New Yorkers. Many residents worried about potential power shortages and higher electricity bills. As the city looks for alternative energy solutions, residents will be watching closely to see how these policies unfold. For more details on the shutdown and its effects, explore this article from the New York Times.

He approved Congestion Pricing.

Cuomo’s approval of Congestion Pricing was another significant moment in his tenure. This initiative aims to reduce traffic in Manhattan by imposing fees on vehicles entering certain areas during peak hours. Proponents argue that it will improve air quality and public transit, but opponents express concerns about the economic impact on businesses and commuters. As New Yorkers adjust to this new reality, it will be essential to monitor how effective these measures are in reducing congestion and improving the quality of life in the city. To learn more about Congestion Pricing, check out this piece from the New York Times.

He killed 15,000 seniors.

Perhaps one of the most devastating criticisms leveled against Cuomo is related to his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in nursing homes. Reports indicate that thousands of seniors lost their lives during the health crisis, leading to immense public outcry and calls for accountability. This tragic outcome has left many families seeking answers and justice. As New Yorkers process the impacts of the pandemic, understanding the full scope of leadership decisions will be crucial for ensuring that such tragedies do not happen again. More information on this heartbreaking issue can be found in NBC News’ coverage.

Bye.

As Cuomo exits the political stage, many New Yorkers are left wondering about the future. His policies and decisions have undoubtedly shaped the landscape of the city, but with new leadership on the horizon, there’s hope for a fresh perspective. Whether you agree or disagree with his tenure, one thing is clear: change is coming, and it’s up to the next mayor to navigate these complex issues and set a new course for New York City.

In the coming months, New Yorkers will have the opportunity to express their opinions, advocate for their communities, and shape the future of their city. As we move forward, let’s stay engaged, informed, and ready to hold our leaders accountable for the decisions they make. The future of New York is in our hands.