Washington state 2020 Election System Forensic investigation Summary

In a detailed report titled "Washington State 2020 Election System Forensic Investigation," author Zachary Larson presents critical findings regarding discrepancies observed during the 2020 election process in Washington State. This investigation, published on June 22, 2025, highlights issues specifically related to late ballot discrepancies and systematic concealment that may have affected the election’s integrity. The report has garnered attention on social media platforms, particularly Twitter, where it has been shared widely, raising questions and concerns among voters and election officials alike.

Overview of the Investigation

The forensic investigation aims to uncover the truth behind the operational processes of the Washington State electoral system during the 2020 elections. The focus is on two main aspects: the discrepancies between primary and general election late ballots and potential systematic concealment of information critical to understanding these discrepancies. The investigation seeks to provide transparency and accountability in the election process, which is vital for the health of democracy.

Primary vs. General Election Late Ballot Discrepancy

One of the central findings of this investigation is the significant discrepancy in late ballot submissions between the primary and general elections. The report meticulously analyzes data related to ballot submissions, highlighting a stark contrast in the number of late ballots received during these two election phases. This discrepancy raises alarms about whether the electoral processes were consistently applied or if there were irregularities that might have influenced the outcome of the elections.

Key Findings

1. Data Analysis: The investigation utilizes statistical methods to analyze late ballot submissions, revealing patterns that suggest potential mishandling or mismanagement during the election process.
2. Comparison of Elections: By comparing the primary and general elections, the report identifies specific trends that warrant further examination. The differences in late ballot handling may point to procedural inconsistencies that could undermine public confidence in the electoral system.
3. Implications for Voter Trust: Highlighting these discrepancies is crucial for maintaining voter trust. If voters feel that the election process is flawed or manipulated, it could deter future participation in elections, ultimately harming democratic engagement.
   

   Systematic Concealment of Information
   

   Another critical aspect of the investigation is the alleged systematic concealment of information related to the electoral process. The report suggests that certain data regarding late ballots, election logistics, and decision-making processes were not adequately disclosed to the public or relevant authorities.

   Areas of Concern
   

4. Lack of Transparency: The investigation points out that the lack of transparency regarding the handling of late ballots raises questions about the motives behind such concealment. It suggests that transparency is essential for accountability in the electoral process.
5. Potential Legal Implications: If the allegations of systematic concealment are proven true, there could be significant legal ramifications for those involved in the election administration. This could lead to calls for reform in how elections are conducted and how information is disseminated to the public.
6. Public Perception: Systematic concealment can severely damage public perception of electoral integrity. The report emphasizes the need for open communication and responsiveness from election officials to rebuild trust among voters.
   

   Link to Further Information
   

   For those interested in exploring the findings of this investigation in greater detail, the full document is available through provided links. The report serves as a vital resource for understanding the complexities and challenges faced during the 2020 election in Washington State.

   • Read the full report here
   • Explore additional insights
     

     Conclusion
     

     Zachary Larson’s "Washington State 2020 Election System Forensic Investigation" sheds light on critical issues surrounding the late ballot discrepancies and potential systematic concealment within the electoral process. As the investigation continues to gain traction, it highlights the importance of transparency, accountability, and trust in the democratic process. The findings serve as a call to action for election officials, lawmakers, and the public to engage in a dialogue about the integrity of electoral systems.

     This ongoing discourse is essential for ensuring that future elections are conducted fairly, with all processes transparent and accessible to the public. As democracy relies on the active participation and trust of its citizens, addressing these findings is crucial for safeguarding the electoral system in Washington State and beyond.

     By acknowledging and addressing these issues, stakeholders can work towards a more robust and trustworthy electoral framework, reinforcing the foundations of democracy and ensuring that every vote is counted and valued.

Washington State

Washington State 2020 Election System Forensic Investigation

By Zachary Larson
June 22, 2025

Primary vs. General Election Late Ballot Discrepancy and Systematic Concealment

Link to document:https://t.co/PVn9dBfMYN https://t.co/DACNaQKrCN pic.twitter.com/ywTpzumFDh

— S.A. Dupres (@Susan_Dupres) June 23, 2025

Washington State

Washington State 2020 Election System Forensic Investigation

The 2020 election in Washington State was a pivotal moment in American history, and the ramifications of that election continue to reverberate through the political landscape. The forensic investigation conducted by Zachary Larson on June 22, 2025, dives deep into the discrepancies observed between primary and general elections, particularly focusing on late ballot handling and potential systematic concealment issues.

Understanding the Forensic Investigation

This forensic investigation is not just a mere recount of votes; it’s an examination of the processes that govern how ballots are managed. The investigation aims to shed light on the discrepancies that arose in late ballot submissions between the primary and general elections. Larson’s report raises essential questions about the integrity of the electoral process and whether systematic concealment could have influenced the election’s outcome.

The Discrepancy Between Primary and General Elections

One of the most significant findings of the investigation is the discrepancy in late ballot counts between the primary and general elections. While the primary election had a relatively smooth process for late ballots, the general election seemed to struggle. What could have caused such a stark difference? Were there changes in the laws or procedures that affected how late ballots were handled? These questions are crucial for understanding the integrity of the election process in Washington State.

The Role of Late Ballots

Late ballots are a critical component of modern elections, especially in an era where absentee and mail-in voting has become the norm. The investigation highlights how late ballots were treated differently in the 2020 elections. For instance, during the primary, voters were able to submit late ballots with minimal complications, but during the general election, numerous reports suggested that late ballots were either not counted or mishandled.

This raises concerns about whether the electoral process was fair and transparent. Voters deserve to know that their voices are heard, regardless of when they submit their ballots. The findings in Larson’s investigation suggest that the integrity of the election process may have been compromised, leading to a call for reforms in how late ballots are handled in future elections.

Systematic Concealment and Its Implications

Larson’s report does not shy away from discussing the potential for systematic concealment within the election process. This term refers to actions that may have deliberately obscured the truth about how ballots were counted and managed. If there was indeed a concerted effort to conceal discrepancies, it could have serious implications for public trust in the electoral system.

Public confidence in elections is paramount for a functioning democracy. If voters feel that their votes are not counted properly or that the system is rigged, it can lead to widespread disenfranchisement and apathy towards future elections. Addressing the issues raised in this forensic investigation is crucial for restoring faith in Washington State’s electoral process.

Key Findings from the Investigation

Through thorough analysis and data collection, Larson’s investigation presents several key findings that highlight the inconsistencies in the 2020 election process:

• Inconsistent late ballot counting: The investigation found that late ballots in the primary election were counted more consistently than in the general election.
• Procedural changes: Changes in procedures between the primary and general elections may have contributed to the discrepancies observed.
• Voter disenfranchisement: Reports of mishandled late ballots suggest that some voters may have been disenfranchised during the general election.

Community Response and Reactions

The investigation has sparked a considerable amount of discussion within the community and among political leaders. Many residents are concerned about the implications of these findings, while others are calling for immediate reforms to ensure that future elections are conducted more transparently.

Community forums and discussions are being organized to address these concerns and to mobilize for potential legislative changes. Citizens are demanding accountability from their elected officials and a commitment to ensuring that every vote counts.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Elections in Washington State

As we move forward, it’s essential to take the findings from Larson’s investigation seriously. The future of elections in Washington State—and indeed, across the United States—will depend on our ability to learn from past mistakes and implement necessary changes. This could include revising laws related to late ballots, improving the transparency of the voting process, and ensuring that all ballots are counted accurately.

The Importance of Transparency in Elections

Transparency is critical in maintaining public trust in the electoral process. As we examine the findings of this forensic investigation, it’s crucial to advocate for policies that promote transparency and accountability. Voters need to be assured that their ballots are handled with care, and that there is a clear, open process for counting votes.

Engaging with the Findings

For those interested in diving deeper into the findings of the forensic investigation, the full report can be accessed through the link provided in the original tweet. Engaging with this document can provide insights into the specifics of the discrepancies and the recommendations for future elections.

Moreover, as citizens, it’s our responsibility to stay informed and engaged with the electoral process. Whether it’s attending local meetings, participating in discussions, or advocating for change, every action counts. The integrity of our democracy relies on active participation from informed citizens.

Conclusion

The forensic investigation into the Washington State 2020 election serves as a vital reminder of the importance of electoral integrity. By understanding the discrepancies and potential issues raised, we can work together to ensure that future elections are conducted fairly and transparently. Let’s continue to advocate for a voting process that is accessible, accountable, and trustworthy for all.

For more information and to stay updated on the developments regarding Washington State elections, keep an eye on local news outlets and official announcements from election offices.