Understanding the Controversy Surrounding the 2020 Election Results

In recent discussions surrounding the 2020 United States presidential election, various claims and narratives have emerged, particularly focusing on the idea of election fraud and media influence. A notable tweet from C3 encapsulates this sentiment, suggesting that the election was compromised through media actions and alleging that the counting of votes was halted under dubious circumstances. This summary aims to dissect the claims made in the tweet while providing an SEO-optimized overview of the broader context.

The Allegations of Fraud

The tweet references a pivotal moment during the election night coverage when Fox news made the controversial decision to call Arizona for Joe Biden. This action has been cited by some as a catalyst that disrupted the counting of votes in several key battleground states. The assertion is that this decision led to a perceived halt in the momentum of counting, particularly in states where Donald trump was leading at the time.

Key States Mentioned

The tweet specifically highlights several states where Trump was reportedly leading when the vote counting was allegedly interrupted:

• Pennsylvania (PA): Trump was up by 16% with 65% of the votes counted.
• Michigan (MI): Trump had a 10% lead with 59% of the votes in.
• Georgia (GA): Trump led by 8% with 83% of the votes counted.
• Wisconsin (WI): Trump was ahead by 5% with 82% of the votes tallied.

  These statistics serve to bolster the claim that the election was unfairly influenced, especially in states that were critical for securing an electoral victory.

  • YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

  The Concept of Media Influence
  

  The tweet raises important questions about the role of media in electoral processes. In the digital age, the responsibility of news outlets to report accurately and the timing of such reports can significantly sway public perception. The narrative presented in the tweet suggests a coordinated effort to influence the outcome of the election through premature reporting, which some have labeled as "treason."

  Public Reaction and Political Implications
  

  The claims surrounding the 2020 election have resulted in a divided public opinion. Many supporters of Trump view the events as a betrayal, while opponents argue that the election was conducted fairly. This divide underscores the broader issue of trust in electoral institutions and media credibility in the United States.

  The Importance of Accurate Reporting
  

  Accurate reporting is crucial in maintaining the integrity of democratic processes. In the age of social media, misinformation can spread rapidly, and it is essential for both news outlets and consumers to critically evaluate the information presented. The claims made in the tweet reflect a broader concern regarding how narratives can be shaped by selective reporting, leading to significant political consequences.

  Conclusion: Reflecting on Election Integrity
  

  The 2020 presidential election remains a contentious topic in American politics, with ongoing debates about election integrity, media influence, and public trust. The tweet from C3 encapsulates a segment of the population that feels aggrieved by the election process and urges a call to remember perceived injustices. As the country moves forward, it will be essential for all stakeholders—voters, media, and politicians—to engage in constructive dialogue about the lessons learned and how to ensure fair elections in the future.

  This summary serves to inform readers about the critical issues surrounding the claims of election fraud and media influence, providing context to a highly charged political narrative while optimizing for search engines with relevant keywords and structured content.

Never forget what they did…

The theft started when Fox fraudulently called AZ for Biden and they stopped counting votes.

PA: Trump up 16% with 65% in
MI: Trump up 10% with 59% in
GA: Trump up 8% with 83% in
WI: Trump up 5% with 82% in

Who gave the green light?

Treason.

— C3 (@C_3C_3) June 17, 2025

Never Forget What They Did…

In recent years, the political landscape in the United States has become increasingly polarized and contentious. If you’re keeping up with the headlines, you may have come across the phrase: “Never forget what they did…” This sentiment resonates deeply, particularly among those who feel that the integrity of elections has been compromised. It’s become a rallying cry for many who believe that the 2020 Presidential Election was fraught with irregularities and questionable decisions. This article dives into the events surrounding those claims, exploring the implications and the ongoing discourse around electoral integrity.

The Theft Started When Fox Fraudulently Called AZ for Biden

One of the pivotal moments that ignited the firestorm of controversy was when Fox News called Arizona for Joe Biden. This decision came under intense scrutiny, as many believe it was premature and potentially influenced the momentum of the election. The claim here is that this call led to a halt in the counting of votes in several critical states. Critics argue that this resulted in a significant loss of transparency and trust in the electoral process. The narrative surrounding this event emphasizes the idea that media outlets have too much power over public perception during elections.

They Stopped Counting Votes

As the dust began to settle post-election, discussions arose about why counting votes was paused in certain states. The claim is that this pause was not only strategic but also indicative of a larger issue at play. In Pennsylvania, for instance, at one point, Trump was reportedly up by 16% with 65% of the votes in. In Michigan, he was leading by 10% with 59% in, while in Georgia, he was ahead by 8% with 83% in. Wisconsin showed a narrower lead for Trump at 5% with 82% in. The narrative here suggests that the stoppage of vote counting was a crucial factor that altered the election’s outcome. [According to reports](https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/03/election-night-count-2020-433315), this created a perception of being manipulated, leading many to question the fairness of the election process.

PA: Trump Up 16% with 65% In

Let’s take a closer look at Pennsylvania. The state had long been considered a battleground, and Trump’s initial lead seemed promising for his campaign. Many supporters were confident that the numbers would hold, especially with 65% of the votes already counted. The abrupt halt in counting raised eyebrows and fueled conspiracy theories about election theft. This kind of situation can create a ripple effect, leading to distrust in the entire system, and many people are still grappling with the implications of what happened that night.

MI: Trump Up 10% with 59% In

Michigan was another state where Trump appeared to be doing well initially. With 59% of the votes tallied and Trump leading by 10%, the atmosphere was charged with anticipation. However, as votes continued to be reported, the narrative shifted dramatically. The delay in reporting results led some to believe that the counting process was manipulated to favor Biden. This has left a lingering question in the minds of many: Why did the counting stop when it seemed like Trump had the upper hand? The feelings of betrayal and frustration are palpable among those who felt their votes were not counted fairly.

GA: Trump Up 8% with 83% In

Georgia’s situation was equally perplexing. With 83% of the votes counted and Trump leading by 8%, the sudden pause in vote counting left many supporters in disbelief. The state had been a focal point of political battles for years, and this election was no exception. The questions surrounding the integrity of the vote led to protests and claims of fraud that continue to echo in political circles today. This dynamic has fueled a narrative that emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in the electoral process.

WI: Trump Up 5% with 82% In

Wisconsin is another state that saw Trump leading with 5% of the votes in. The situation in this state reflected similar concerns about how the vote counting was being handled. The pause in counting raised suspicions among many who felt that the election was not being conducted fairly. As the results rolled in, the narrative of election theft gained traction, leading to widespread discussions about the integrity of our democratic processes. The lingering questions about the motivation behind stopping the counting are something that keeps people engaged in this debate.

Who Gave the Green Light?

This brings us to another critical question: Who gave the green light for these actions? The lack of clear answers has left many feeling disillusioned with the entire electoral process. Allegations of treason and corruption have been thrown around, creating an environment where trust in the government and electoral institutions is eroding. The belief that there was a coordinated effort to manipulate the election has sparked a firestorm of debates, protests, and calls for reform. Many are demanding accountability and transparency to restore faith in the electoral system.

Treason

The term “treason” is a powerful one, and it’s been used frequently in discussions about the 2020 election. For many, it encapsulates the feeling of betrayal they experienced when the election didn’t go as they had hoped. The idea that there could be a deliberate attempt to undermine the democratic process is alarming, and it’s a sentiment that resonates deeply with a significant portion of the population. This feeling of treachery is what drives many to continue speaking out and pushing for change in the electoral system.

The Ongoing Discourse

The fallout from the 2020 election continues to shape conversations around electoral integrity today. The claims of fraud and manipulation have led to various legislative efforts aimed at reforming voting laws across the country. Some states have enacted stricter voting regulations, while others have moved to expand access to voting. The debate is far from over, and the impacts of the past election are likely to be felt for years to come.

Engaging in the Conversation

It’s essential to stay engaged in this conversation about electoral integrity. Understanding the various perspectives can help bridge the divide that exists in our political landscape. Whether you believe that the election was fair or that there were significant irregularities, discussing these issues openly is crucial for the health of our democracy. As the saying goes, “Never forget what they did…” serves as a reminder to remain vigilant and informed about the processes that shape our governance.

Conclusion

The 2020 election was a pivotal moment in American history, and the ramifications of that night continue to unfold. The claims of fraud, manipulation, and treason are not just political talking points; they represent a broader crisis of confidence in our electoral systems. Engaging in discussions, educating ourselves, and advocating for transparency can help rebuild trust in our democratic processes. Remember, the journey towards integrity and accountability in elections is ongoing, and it’s one we must all contribute to.

“`

This article incorporates the key phrases you provided while also maintaining a conversational tone and engaging content. It addresses the various elements surrounding the claims of electoral misconduct and emphasizes the importance of transparency and integrity in elections.