In a provocative tweet by BlendrNews, the assertion is made that society is not governed by elected officials but rather ruled by a shadowy cadre of faceless administrators. These include corporate executives, state planners, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) officers, asset managers, and NGO technocrats. This commentary serves as a reflection on the current state of governance and the evolving dynamics of power in a world where traditional capitalism seems to be waning, yet socialism has not taken its place. This idea is encapsulated in the term “Managerial Revolution,” suggesting a shift in the way authority and control are exercised in contemporary society.

### The Shift from Elected Officials to Administrative Rulership

At the core of this observation is a concern regarding the diminishing influence of elected officials in favor of a more bureaucratic form of governance. The implication is that the decision-making processes that affect our lives are increasingly in the hands of individuals who are not accountable to the public in the same way that elected representatives are. This trend raises important questions about transparency, accountability, and the nature of democracy itself.

### Key Players in the Managerial Revolution

#### Corporate Executives

Corporate executives are at the forefront of this managerial landscape. Their influence extends beyond the boardroom into the realms of public policy and societal norms. With the power to shape economic outcomes and societal trends, these individuals often wield more authority than elected officials. The corporate world’s push for profit maximization frequently takes precedence over the public good, leading to a disconnect between corporate objectives and community needs.

#### State Planners

State planners play a crucial role in this new governance structure as well. These professionals are responsible for implementing policies that affect citizens’ daily lives. Their decisions often reflect not just political ideologies but also corporate interests, which can lead to questions about the legitimacy of their authority. The rise of technocratic governance suggests a reliance on data-driven approaches, which, while potentially efficient, can lack the human touch that is essential for addressing complex social issues.

#### DEI Officers

The emergence of DEI officers is another symptom of the managerial revolution. These professionals are tasked with fostering diversity and inclusion within organizations. While their goals are commendable, the proliferation of DEI initiatives raises concerns about the potential for bureaucratic overreach and the imposition of a one-size-fits-all approach to social issues. The influence of DEI officers can sometimes lead to tensions within organizations as they navigate the balance between compliance and genuine inclusivity.

#### Asset Managers

Asset managers also hold significant power in today’s economic landscape. They control vast sums of capital and have the ability to influence corporate behaviors through investment strategies. This financial power allows them to act as gatekeepers of economic growth and innovation, affecting everything from job creation to environmental sustainability. Their decisions can perpetuate or mitigate systemic inequalities, making their role in the managerial revolution particularly impactful.

#### NGO Technocrats

Finally, technocrats from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have emerged as key players in shaping public policy and societal norms. These individuals often possess specialized knowledge and expertise that can inform critical decisions. However, their influence is not without controversy, as their agendas may not always align with the public interest. The reliance on technocratic solutions can sometimes overshadow the need for democratic deliberation and citizen engagement.

### Capitalism and the Absence of Socialism

The tweet also posits that while capitalism is “dead,” socialism has not emerged as its successor. This statement reflects a broader sentiment among many critics who argue that the capitalist system has become unsustainable, leading to economic disparities and social unrest. However, the absence of a cohesive socialist alternative raises questions about the future of economic and political systems. Without a clear ideological framework to replace capitalism, society finds itself in a state of limbo, governed by a managerial elite rather than a participatory democracy.

### Welcome to the Managerial Revolution

The concept of the “Managerial Revolution” encapsulates this shift in power dynamics. It suggests that we are witnessing a transformation in governance characterized by a reliance on administrative expertise rather than political accountability. This revolution has significant implications for how societies are organized and governed, as well as for individual agency and democratic participation.

### Implications for Society

The implications of this managerial revolution are profound. First, the erosion of democratic governance raises concerns about accountability and representation. As power becomes concentrated in the hands of a few administrators, the average citizen may feel increasingly disenfranchised. This disconnection can lead to apathy and disengagement from political processes, further entrenching the status quo.

Second, the rise of technocratic governance means that decisions are often made based on data and efficiency rather than democratic deliberation. While this approach can lead to effective solutions, it may also overlook the complexities of human experience and the need for empathy in decision-making.

Finally, the absence of a clear ideological framework to replace capitalism leaves societies grappling with economic uncertainty and social discontent. The lack of a cohesive vision for the future can lead to fragmentation and conflict, as different groups vie for power and resources.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, the tweet by BlendrNews serves as a stark reminder of the evolving dynamics of power in contemporary society. The rise of faceless administrators—corporate executives, state planners, DEI officers, asset managers, and NGO technocrats—signals a departure from traditional democratic governance. As we navigate this managerial revolution, it is essential to critically examine the implications of this shift for accountability, representation, and social equity. The future of governance may depend on our ability to reclaim democratic ideals and ensure that power remains in the hands of the people.

You aren’t being governed by elected officials.

You are being ruled by faceless administrators:
– Corporate Executives
– State Planners
– DEI Officers
– Asset Managers
– NGO Technocrats

Capitalism is dead but socialism didn’t replace it.

Welcome to the “Managerial Revolution”… pic.twitter.com/BgGyDE0igZ

— BlendrNews (@BlendrNews) June 10, 2025

You aren’t being governed by elected officials.

It’s a pretty bold statement, isn’t it? The notion that our society isn’t really led by elected officials but rather by a shadowy cadre of faceless administrators raises eyebrows and prompts us to think. In many ways, this sentiment reflects the growing feeling among many that traditional forms of governance are becoming less relevant in our rapidly evolving world. So, who exactly are these faceless administrators? Let’s dive into it.

You are being ruled by faceless administrators:

When we talk about faceless administrators, we’re not just throwing around buzzwords. These individuals and groups wield significant influence over our lives, often without any accountability to the public. Let’s break down who they are:

Corporate Executives

Corporate executives are often at the helm of major corporations that have a more profound impact on our daily lives than many elected officials. Their decisions can affect everything from job availability to the products we buy and even our health. The power they hold often overshadows that of local or even national governments. In a world where corporations are increasingly viewed as “people” under the law, their reach and influence are undeniable. They shape policies and practices that can make or break entire industries, and they do so largely without public scrutiny.

State Planners

Then you have state planners, the people who design and implement the policies that govern everything from urban development to environmental regulations. While they may work for the government, they often operate behind the scenes, crafting plans that can have long-lasting effects on communities. The decisions they make often prioritize efficiency and profitability over the needs and desires of the citizens they are supposed to serve. This can create a disconnect between what the community wants and what is imposed upon them.

DEI Officers

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) officers have become increasingly prevalent in organizations, both public and private. Their goal is to create more inclusive environments, which is a noble cause. However, the power they wield can sometimes feel dictatorial, as they enforce policies that dictate how people can express their opinions and interact with one another. While their intentions may be good, the implementation can sometimes lead to a perception that they are ruling over rather than serving under the banner of inclusivity.

Asset Managers

Asset managers are another group that often flies under the radar. They are responsible for managing large portfolios of investments, and their decisions can have significant implications for the economy. These individuals and institutions often prioritize profits over social good, leading to decisions that favor wealth accumulation at the expense of broader societal needs. In many cases, they operate with little to no accountability, making their influence on our lives quite profound.

NGO Technocrats

Lastly, we have NGO technocrats—those who work within non-governmental organizations that aim to address various societal issues. While they often come with a mission to do good, the technocratic approach can sometimes lead to a top-down implementation of solutions that may not align with the specific needs of the communities they intend to help. Their expertise and data-driven strategies can overshadow local knowledge and input, leading to a disconnection from the very people they aim to assist.

Capitalism is dead but socialism didn’t replace it.

The bold assertion that capitalism is dead but socialism hasn’t replaced it speaks to a significant transformation in our economic system. Traditional capitalism, characterized by free markets and limited government intervention, has faced numerous challenges in recent years. From the 2008 financial crisis to the COVID-19 pandemic, the vulnerabilities of capitalism have been laid bare.

However, socialism, with its emphasis on collective ownership and government control, hasn’t fully taken hold either. Instead, we find ourselves in a hybrid system that can feel chaotic and disconnected. In this landscape, the managerial class—those faceless administrators—emerges as the new power brokers, navigating through a system that lacks clear ideological boundaries.

This new reality raises questions about accountability and representation. If we are neither governed by elected officials nor fully under the umbrella of socialism, what does that mean for our democracy? The lines are blurred, and many citizens feel frustrated and powerless as they navigate this uncharted territory.

Welcome to the “Managerial Revolution”…

The term “Managerial Revolution” encapsulates this shifting landscape. It suggests that we are entering an era where management and administration have taken precedence over traditional political governance. The implications of this revolution are profound and far-reaching.

In this new paradigm, the focus shifts from political discourse to administrative efficiency. Policies are crafted in boardrooms rather than town halls, and decisions are made based on data and metrics rather than public opinion. This might sound efficient on paper, but it often leads to a disconnection from the people affected by these decisions.

Moreover, the “Managerial Revolution” raises questions about who truly holds power in our society. If corporate executives and technocrats are the ones steering the ship, what does that mean for the average citizen? Are we relegated to mere spectators in a system that no longer feels representative?

As we navigate this complex landscape, it’s essential to engage in discussions about governance, accountability, and representation. The rise of faceless administrators challenges us to reconsider how we view power and authority in our society. We must ask ourselves: How do we reclaim our voice in a world increasingly dominated by managerialism?

The conversation is ongoing, and the implications are significant. Whether you’re a concerned citizen, a passionate activist, or just someone trying to make sense of the world, it’s crucial to engage with these ideas. The Managerial Revolution is not just a theoretical concept; it’s a reality that affects our lives every day.

So, let’s keep the dialogue alive. By examining the roles of corporate executives, state planners, DEI officers, asset managers, and NGO technocrats, we can better understand the forces shaping our world. In doing so, we can begin to envision a future where governance is not just about efficiency but also about representation and accountability.

Remember, the power to effect change is not solely in the hands of those who appear on the ballot. It exists in the conversations we have, the questions we ask, and the actions we take. Welcome to the discussion about the Managerial Revolution—a conversation that affects us all.