Summary of Eric Coomer’s Controversial Statements on Dominion Voting Systems

In a recent revelation shared through a tweet by journalist Emerald Robinson, Eric Coomer, a former employee of Dominion Voting Systems, made significant statements regarding the quality of the company’s voting products. The comments, which date back to 2019 and earlier, have sparked renewed discussions about the integrity and reliability of electronic voting systems, particularly in light of the controversies surrounding the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

Background on Eric Coomer and Dominion Voting Systems

Dominion Voting Systems is a prominent supplier of voting machines and software used in various elections across the United States. The company has faced scrutiny and criticism, especially following the 2020 election, where allegations of vote manipulation and system vulnerabilities were widely circulated. Eric Coomer, who worked as the Director of Product Strategy and Security at Dominion, has been at the center of this controversy due to his candid remarks about the company’s products.

Key Statements Made by Eric Coomer

In a tweet posted by Emerald Robinson, Coomer’s quotes have been highlighted to demonstrate his candid assessment of Dominion’s technology. In 2019, Coomer reportedly stated, “our products suck,” a stark admission that raises questions about the user experience and effectiveness of voting machines. Such a declaration from a high-ranking employee indicates potential internal acknowledgment of systemic issues within the company’s products.

Moreover, in an email from 2018, Coomer identified a “critical bug leading to INCORRECT results.” This statement not only underscores the technical challenges faced by Dominion’s voting systems but also points to the critical implications such bugs can have on electoral integrity. Coomer’s statement, “It does not get much worse than that,” serves as a chilling warning about the potential consequences of software flaws in voting technology.

Implications of Coomer’s Statements

Coomer’s remarks may have far-reaching implications for public trust in voting systems. With growing concerns about election security and the integrity of the democratic process, such admissions raise alarms among voters, policymakers, and election officials. The acknowledgment of bugs and subpar products by a former employee could fuel ongoing debates about the reliability of electronic voting systems and the need for rigorous testing and verification processes.

The transparency regarding product quality and vulnerabilities is crucial for maintaining public confidence in electoral outcomes. As more people become aware of Coomer’s admissions, there may be increased calls for comprehensive audits and reassessments of voting technologies used in elections.

The Broader Context: Election Integrity and Technology

The statements made by Eric Coomer are part of a larger conversation about election integrity, especially in an era where technology plays an increasingly dominant role in the electoral process. The reliance on electronic voting machines has raised concerns about cybersecurity, hacking risks, and the overall transparency of the voting process.

In light of Coomer’s admissions, there is a compelling argument for reevaluating how voting systems are developed, tested, and implemented. Ensuring that these systems meet high standards of quality and security is essential for safeguarding democratic processes and restoring trust among voters.

Conclusion

The revelations from Eric Coomer regarding the quality of Dominion Voting Systems’ products cannot be overlooked. His candid statements about critical bugs and overall product shortcomings have reignited discussions about the reliability of electronic voting systems. As the country moves forward, it is imperative that stakeholders address these concerns, implement necessary reforms, and enhance the security and integrity of voting technologies to ensure that every vote counts.

In summary, the implications of Coomer’s statements extend beyond just the realm of Dominion Voting Systems; they highlight the critical need for transparency, accountability, and public trust in the electoral process. As we approach future elections, it is vital to keep the conversation going about the importance of secure and reliable voting systems to uphold the democratic ideals that underpin our society.

10) In 2019, Dominion employee Eric Coomer stated that “our products suck.”

In 2018, he also identified a “*critical* bug leading to INCORRECT results” in an email.

He also said: “It does not get much worse than that.”

— Emerald Robinson (@EmeraldRobinson) June 4, 2025

10) In 2019, Dominion employee Eric Coomer stated that “our products suck.”

In the world of technology, especially when it comes to voting systems, transparency and reliability are key. Eric Coomer, a Dominion Voting Systems employee, dropped a bombshell in 2019 when he candidly stated that “our products suck.” This statement raised eyebrows and sparked a flurry of discussions about the integrity of voting systems in the United States. It’s not every day that a company insider publicly criticizes the very products they help create, and this admission has left many questioning the reliability of Dominion’s technology.

In 2018, he also identified a “*critical* bug leading to INCORRECT results” in an email.

But the story doesn’t end there. Just a year prior, Coomer sent out an email where he identified a “*critical* bug leading to INCORRECT results.” This revelation is significant because it highlights potential flaws in a system that millions of Americans rely on during elections. When a key employee points out severe vulnerabilities, it raises an alarm about the overall integrity of the election process. Bugs in software can lead to catastrophic outcomes, especially in situations where accurate results are paramount. If a voting system is producing incorrect results, the implications are enormous, affecting not just the immediate election but also public trust in the electoral process.

He also said: “It does not get much worse than that.”

In a follow-up statement, Coomer emphasized the seriousness of the situation by saying, “It does not get much worse than that.” These words resonate deeply in a time when questions about election security and integrity are at the forefront of national conversations. Coomer’s acknowledgment of the flaws in Dominion’s products is a wake-up call for both the company and the public. It demands immediate attention and swift action to address these vulnerabilities. When systems that are meant to uphold democracy are compromised, the consequences can be dire. Citizens deserve to have confidence in their electoral processes, and statements like those from Coomer only serve to undermine that trust.

The Importance of Transparency in Voting Technology

With Coomer’s admissions in mind, it’s clear that transparency in voting technology is more crucial than ever. Voters need to know that the systems that count their votes are secure and reliable. The integrity of elections is the bedrock of democracy, and any doubt cast over that integrity can have long-lasting effects. It’s not just about software bugs; it’s about the trust that the public places in the electoral system.

As we look at the implications of Coomer’s statements, it becomes evident that Dominion and other voting technology companies must take proactive steps to ensure their products meet the highest standards. This includes rigorous testing, regular audits, and open lines of communication with the public about any potential issues. Voters should be assured that their voices are heard and counted accurately—after all, democracy depends on it.

Public Reactions and Concerns

The public response to Coomer’s statements has been mixed, with some expressing alarm and others calling for a deeper investigation into Dominion’s practices. Many citizens are beginning to demand accountability, questioning how such critical issues could arise without proper oversight. Trust in elections is fragile, and any misstep can lead to widespread skepticism.

In an age where misinformation spreads faster than ever, it’s vital for companies like Dominion to combat these narratives with transparency and proactive communication. Engaging with the public and addressing concerns head-on can help restore faith in the electoral system and their technology.

The Role of Media in Amplifying Concerns

The media plays a crucial role in amplifying concerns raised by individuals like Coomer. news outlets and journalists have the responsibility to investigate and report on these critical issues. They not only inform the public but also hold companies accountable for their practices. This is essential in a democracy where informed citizens are necessary for a functioning society. By shining a light on potential flaws in voting systems, the media can help promote a culture of accountability.

Furthermore, as citizens consume news, it’s important to approach it with a critical mind. Understanding the context behind statements made by individuals like Coomer can help the public discern fact from fiction. This is especially crucial in the context of elections, where emotions can run high, and misinformation can spread like wildfire.

What Can Be Done Moving Forward?

So, what can be done moving forward to address the concerns raised by Eric Coomer? Firstly, Dominion and other voting technology companies must prioritize the security and reliability of their products. This involves investing in better software development practices, conducting thorough testing, and being transparent about any identified flaws.

Secondly, there should be independent audits of voting systems to ensure they are functioning correctly. These audits can help verify the integrity of the election process and provide reassurance to voters. Additionally, open communication between companies, election officials, and the public is essential for rebuilding trust.

Lastly, education is key. Voters should be informed about how their voting systems work, including the potential vulnerabilities and the measures in place to protect against them. When citizens understand the technology behind their elections, they are more likely to trust the process.

Final Thoughts on Election Integrity

The statements made by Eric Coomer have opened up a Pandora’s box of questions regarding the integrity of voting systems. While it’s unsettling to hear an employee from Dominion express such concerns, it also serves as a catalyst for necessary dialogue about election security. Maintaining the integrity of elections is a shared responsibility among technology companies, government officials, and citizens alike.

As we move forward, let’s remember that democracy thrives on transparency, accountability, and trust. It’s time to take a hard look at the systems we rely on and ensure they serve us well. The stakes are too high, and the future of our democracy depends on it.