The Conspiracy Theory Surrounding LBJ and JFK’s Assassination

In the realm of American history, few events have sparked as much debate and conspiracy as the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) on November 22, 1963. The tragic event not only marked a pivotal moment in U.S. history but also gave rise to a myriad of conspiracy theories surrounding the motives and players involved. One of the most controversial figures associated with these theories is Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ), who succeeded JFK as president. Roger Stone, a prominent political consultant, has been a vocal proponent of the theory that LBJ played a central role in a conspiracy to assassinate JFK, involving the CIA, the Mob, and Texas oil interests.

The Case Against LBJ

In his book, "The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ," Roger Stone posits that LBJ, who served as vice president under JFK, orchestrated the assassination due to a combination of political ambition and personal vendettas. Stone argues that LBJ’s thirst for power and his connections with powerful figures in the CIA and organized crime created a perfect storm of motives for wanting JFK out of the way.

Stone’s claims are bolstered by a range of circumstantial evidence, historical context, and testimony from various individuals involved in the political landscape of the time. While many historians and scholars dismiss these theories as unfounded, they continue to resonate with a segment of the population that finds them compelling.

The Involvement of the CIA

One of the core components of Stone’s argument is the alleged involvement of the CIA in the assassination plot. The CIA had a contentious relationship with JFK, particularly over issues related to Cuba and the Bay of Pigs invasion. Stone suggests that LBJ, with his connections to the intelligence community, could have orchestrated a collaboration with the CIA to eliminate JFK.

The notion that the CIA had motives for wanting JFK dead is not entirely unfounded; many conspiracy theorists point to the agency’s history of clandestine operations and political manipulation as evidence that they could have played a role in the assassination. However, proving direct involvement remains a significant hurdle for proponents of this theory.

The Mafia’s Role

Another key player in Stone’s narrative is organized crime, specifically the Mafia. JFK’s administration had launched a war on organized crime, which angered powerful figures in the underworld. Stone argues that LBJ could have brokered a deal with the Mafia to arrange JFK’s assassination, capitalizing on their mutual interests.

The Mafia’s historical animosity toward JFK, particularly his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, provides a backdrop that could lend credence to this theory. However, concrete evidence linking the Mafia to the assassination plot remains elusive, and many historians caution against drawing conclusions based solely on speculation.

Texas Oil Interests

Texas oil tycoons are also implicated in Stone’s theory. LBJ was closely connected to the oil industry, and some argue that JFK’s policies threatened the financial interests of powerful Texas oilmen. Stone suggests that LBJ, motivated by both personal ambition and the desire to protect his allies’ financial interests, could have conspired with these individuals to facilitate JFK’s assassination.

The intersection of politics, business, and personal relationships in Texas during the early 1960s creates a complex landscape that is ripe for speculation. However, critics of Stone’s theory argue that connecting these dots requires a leap of faith that is not substantiated by solid evidence.

The Controversy Surrounding Stone’s Claims

Roger Stone’s book has sparked significant controversy and debate. Supporters argue that he has shed light on a dark chapter of American history that has been largely ignored or dismissed by mainstream historians. They claim that the evidence he presents highlights the potential for a conspiracy involving multiple high-profile figures, including LBJ.

On the other hand, critics assert that Stone’s claims are based on conjecture rather than fact. Many historians and scholars have thoroughly examined the circumstances surrounding JFK’s assassination and have found little to support Stone’s theories. The prevailing view among these experts is that the assassination was the act of a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, rather than the result of a grand conspiracy.

The Search for Truth

The enduring fascination with JFK’s assassination and the theories surrounding it speaks to a broader cultural appetite for conspiracy narratives. In an age where information is often manipulated and the truth can be difficult to discern, many individuals find solace in alternative explanations for historical events.

While Roger Stone’s assertions may not be widely accepted in academic circles, they contribute to the ongoing conversation about the complexities of power, ambition, and the lengths to which individuals may go to achieve their goals. The question of whether LBJ was involved in a conspiracy to murder JFK remains a topic of debate, and the search for answers continues.

Conclusion

In summary, Roger Stone’s claims regarding LBJ’s alleged involvement in the assassination of JFK represent a provocative chapter in the ongoing discourse surrounding one of America’s most infamous events. While the evidence presented in "The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ" has been met with skepticism, it undeniably contributes to the rich tapestry of conspiracy theories that continue to captivate the public’s imagination. Whether one subscribes to Stone’s theories or views them as mere speculation, the legacy of JFK’s assassination remains a poignant reminder of the complexities of American politics and the shadows that often lurk behind historical narratives.

For those interested in exploring this controversial perspective further, Stone’s book is available for purchase, offering an in-depth look at his case against LBJ and the broader implications of JFK’s tragic assassination.

Nothing released thus far disproves that LBJ was at the helm of a plot—one that included the CIA, the Mob, and Big Texas Oil—to murder President JFK

Get your SIGNED copy of my New York Times best seller, “The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ”https://t.co/wPt9bLIaug pic.twitter.com/AP03iUy8Pn

— Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) March 19, 2025

Unraveling the Conspiracy: LBJ and the Assassination of JFK

When it comes to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, conspiracy theories abound. One of the most controversial figures in this narrative is Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ), the Vice President who ascended to the presidency after JFK’s death. In the viral tweet by Roger Stone, he claims, “Nothing released thus far disproves that LBJ was at the helm of a plot—one that included the CIA, the Mob, and Big Texas Oil—to murder President JFK.” Let’s dive into this assertion and explore its implications.

The Cast of Characters: LBJ, the CIA, and the Mob

Roger Stone’s tweet references a complex web of influential players that allegedly collaborated in a conspiracy to assassinate JFK. The notion that LBJ was at the center of this plot raises eyebrows and invites scrutiny. After all, LBJ had a lot to gain from JFK’s removal. As Vice President, he was often sidelined by JFK’s administration and faced a challenging political landscape. His ambitions to lead were evident, and the idea that he may have conspired with the CIA and organized crime to achieve that goal has fascinated many.

Throughout history, the CIA has been entangled in various covert operations, some of which have skirted the edges of legality. The Mob, with its deep connections and influence, was no stranger to political maneuvering. The collaboration of these entities, coupled with Texas oil interests—who felt threatened by JFK’s policies—creates a fertile ground for conspiracy theories. Many have speculated that this trifecta sought to eliminate JFK for their gain.

Roger Stone’s Book: “The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ”

Stone’s assertions are fleshed out in his book, “The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ”, which has garnered attention as a New York Times bestseller. In this work, he presents evidence and arguments that challenge the official narrative surrounding JFK’s assassination. Stone’s perspective is controversial, to say the least, but it adds another layer to the already complex story of that fateful day in Dallas.

In his book, Stone argues that LBJ’s motives were deeply intertwined with the interests of the CIA and organized crime. The idea that such high-profile figures could collude to orchestrate a political assassination is not new, but Stone’s detailed examination revitalizes interest in these theories. He delves into the political climate of the 1960s, LBJ’s ambitions, and the various factions that might have benefited from JFK’s death.

Investigating the Evidence: What Do We Know?

As we explore whether “Nothing released thus far disproves that LBJ was at the helm of a plot,” it’s essential to consider the evidence available. Numerous investigations, including the Warren Commission and later inquiries, have attempted to piece together the events leading up to JFK’s assassination. However, many still argue that these investigations were flawed or incomplete.

Critics point to inconsistencies in the official accounts, claiming that crucial evidence has been overlooked or suppressed. The idea that LBJ played a role in the conspiracy continues to gain traction among conspiracy theorists, particularly as more documents are declassified over time. The suggestion that LBJ had a hand in JFK’s assassination is provocative and has led to renewed calls for transparency regarding government records related to the incident.

The Role of Big Texas Oil

Another significant angle in this conspiracy theory is the involvement of Big Texas Oil. Many believe that powerful oil interests, who felt threatened by JFK’s approach to foreign policy and energy regulation, had a motive to see him removed from power. The Texas oil industry was a formidable force, and their connections to LBJ could have facilitated a conspiracy to eliminate JFK.

JFK’s push for civil rights and his stance against the oil depletion allowance were viewed unfavorably by some influential oil magnates. The idea that LBJ, who had strong ties to the oil industry, might have collaborated with these interests adds another layer of complexity to the assassination narrative.

The Impact of Historical Revisionism

In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in historical revisionism regarding the JFK assassination. Works like Stone’s aim to challenge the mainstream understanding of these events, prompting readers to question the established narrative. While some may dismiss these theories as mere speculation, they highlight the ongoing fascination with the assassination and its implications for American politics.

The narrative surrounding JFK’s assassination is not just about one individual; it reflects broader themes of power, ambition, and the lengths to which people will go to achieve their goals. The notion that LBJ orchestrated a conspiracy, involving high-profile players such as the CIA and organized crime, continues to captivate public imagination.

Public Perception: The Legacy of JFK’s Assassination

The assassination of JFK has left a lasting mark on American history and collective memory. It sparked countless theories, debates, and investigations that continue to this day. The idea that LBJ could have been involved in such a grave act poses significant questions about loyalty, ambition, and the moral compass of those in power.

Public perception of LBJ has fluctuated over the decades. While he is often credited with significant civil rights advancements and social programs, the shadow of the JFK assassination looms large. Stone’s claims, and the theories surrounding LBJ’s potential involvement, continue to fuel discussions about morality and integrity in politics.

Continuing the Conversation: The Need for Transparency

The call for transparency regarding JFK’s assassination remains strong. Many believe that the release of classified documents could shed light on the murky waters of this historical event. The desire for truth is universal, and the implications of these revelations could reshape our understanding of not only JFK’s death but also the political landscape of the 1960s.

As we reflect on the complexities surrounding the assassination, it’s crucial to engage in open discussions about history and its interpretation. With voices like Roger Stone’s bringing attention to these theories, the conversation is far from over.

Final Thoughts: An Open Case

The intrigue surrounding JFK’s assassination, LBJ’s potential involvement, and the alleged collaboration with the CIA and organized crime remains a captivating topic. As new evidence emerges and scholars continue to investigate, the quest for answers continues. Whether you believe in the conspiracy theories or lean towards the official narrative, it’s clear that the assassination of JFK has left an indelible mark on American history.

So, what do you think? Is there merit to the claims that LBJ was at the helm of a plot involving the CIA, the Mob, and Big Texas Oil? Or is this just another chapter in the complex history of political intrigue? Regardless of where you stand, it’s a conversation worth having.

If you’re intrigued by these claims, consider picking up a copy of Roger Stone’s “The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ” to explore this perspective further.