1. “Unproven and costly biohacking techniques”
2. “The value and cost of biohacking experimentation”.
Is Bio-Hacking Worth the Cost of Admission?
How much money would you pay to have the muscles, metabolism, and energy of a 20-year-old? It’s a question that has captured the attention of tech giants, supplement companies, and wellness gurus in recent years. They are selling the idea that with the right gadgets, pills, and routines, your body can reverse its biological age.
Stats show that the longevity industry is worth almost US$320 million, and many people are buying into the idea. This has given rise to a movement known as bio-hacking, which encompasses a range of experiments aimed at improving the body’s functions. From gene-editing tools to microchip implants and intermittent fasting, biohackers are pushing the boundaries of what the human body can achieve.
The Rise of Biohacking
The concept of biohacking dates back to the late eighties but gained prominence in the early aughts, thanks to Silicon Valley entrepreneurs seeking ways to optimize their efficiency. These biohackers aimed to push the perceived limitations of the human body, including aging and death itself.
Recently, ideas about biohacking and longevity have begun to enter mainstream fitness and wellness circles. In Toronto, Sweat and Tonic, a gym and fitness studio, has positioned itself at the forefront of the biohacking movement. Their exclusive membership, Club Transcend, offers a range of services such as cryotherapy, red-light treatments, exercise classes, and personal training, all aimed at body restoration.
While the price tag of $1,000 a month may not be affordable for the majority, it appeals to those who take their health and wellness seriously. But are these treatments worth the cost? Can they truly make you feel younger?
The Science Behind Biohacking Treatments
Cryotherapy involves subjecting individuals to extreme cold temperatures of -130°C for a short duration. Proponents claim that this helps with inflammation and boosts metabolism. Red-light therapy, on the other hand, uses low-wavelength red light on the body to treat skin conditions and increase circulation.
While some individuals may feel better after using these treatments, further research is needed to determine their effectiveness. Additionally, the idea of deeming someone physically younger than their actual age is difficult to measure in a meaningful way.
Leaders in the biohacking space have been using data to support their claims. InsideTracker, a wellness brand, analyzes clients’ blood using 17 different biomarkers to determine their biological age, referred to as InnerAge. This information helps provide personalized recommendations for nutrition, exercise, and lifestyle changes. However, these tests can be costly, ranging from US$250 to $350.
Dr. Gil Blander, the chief scientific officer and co-founder of InsideTracker, believes that the investment is worthwhile for those serious about extending their lifespan. The goal is to potentially slow down the aging process and provide individuals with a roadmap to optimal wellness.
Skepticism and Criticism
While optimizing biomarkers and making positive changes to health behaviors can have a significant impact on overall well-being, skeptics argue that the various forms of biohacking may not truly lead to longevity. Without unified data and rigorous research, it is challenging to objectively measure their effects.
Professor Charles Brenner, a global expert in biology, chemistry, and metabolism, asserts that uncritical press coverage and weak research papers have propelled the biohacking movement. He believes that scientists greatly exaggerate the ability to extend life expectancy and will continue to promise more than they can deliver.
Looking to the Future
Knowing whether biohacking treatments actually deliver on their promises will require long-term study. However, for those who believe in the promise of longevity, the potential payoff may be worth the investment. While skeptics remain unconvinced, the pursuit of a better, healthier version of oneself continues to drive interest in the biohacking movement.
As the biohacking industry continues to evolve, it will be important to separate hype from reality and ensure that scientific evidence supports the claims made by proponents. Only then can individuals make informed decisions about their health and well-being.
.
1. “Wild world of biohacking: Unproven and expensive techniques”
2. “The worth of biohacking: Is it worth the price?”.
