“Govt Grants CJP Justice Qazi Faez Isa Power to Nominate Committee Members in New Ordinance”

So, there’s quite a buzz on social media about a recent announcement made by the government. Allegedly, there’s been a decision to amend the practice and procedure act through a presidential ordinance. What’s even more interesting is that Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa will reportedly be given the power to nominate any judge member of a committee in the absence of any other member. Now, this is definitely raising some eyebrows and sparking conversations all around.

The news was first shared on Twitter by Asad Ali Toor, and it has since caught the attention of many netizens. The tweet contains a screenshot of the breaking news, with the caption highlighting the significant change in the judicial system. It’s important to note that this information is not confirmed yet, as it is mentioned as an alleged decision. However, the potential implications of such a move are definitely worth discussing.

If this amendment does come into effect, it could potentially shift the dynamics within the judiciary system. Giving Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa the authority to nominate committee members in the absence of others could lead to a more centralized decision-making process. This could have both positive and negative impacts, depending on how it is implemented.

The fact that this decision is being made through a presidential ordinance adds another layer of complexity to the situation. It raises questions about the separation of powers and the extent of executive authority in the legal system. The implications of such a move could have far-reaching consequences for the judiciary and the overall governance of the country.

As with any breaking news, it’s essential to approach it with a critical eye and wait for official confirmation before jumping to conclusions. The source of the information, a tweet from Asad Ali Toor, may not provide all the necessary context and details surrounding this alleged decision. It’s crucial to gather more information from reliable sources and experts in the field to fully understand the implications of this potential change.

In the world of politics and law, rumors and speculations are not uncommon. It’s part of the nature of the game to navigate through the noise and get to the heart of the matter. So, while this news about Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa gaining more power may seem alarming at first glance, it’s important to delve deeper into the issue and understand the full scope of what is being proposed.

As the story continues to develop, it will be interesting to see how different stakeholders react to this alleged decision. Will there be pushback from other members of the judiciary or legal experts? How will the public perceive this move, and what implications will it have for the overall justice system in the country? These are all important questions that need to be explored further as more information becomes available.

So, as we wait for more details to emerge, it’s essential to approach this news with a critical mindset and an open attitude. The legal and political landscape is ever-evolving, and it’s crucial to stay informed and engaged with the latest developments. Only then can we truly understand the potential impact of decisions like the one being alleged in this breaking news.

🚨🚨#BREAKING: Govt decides to amend practice & procedure act through a presidential ordinance, and will give CJP #JusticeQaziFaezIsa power to nominate any judge member of committee in absence of any member. pic.twitter.com/v0G9ktqbPf

— Asad Ali Toor (@AsadAToor) September 19, 2024

#BREAKING: Govt decides to amend practice & procedure act through a presidential ordinance, and will give CJP #JusticeQaziFaezIsa power to nominate any judge member of committee in absence of any member

The recent decision by the government to amend the practice and procedure act through a presidential ordinance has sparked a wave of controversy and debate across the country. This decision will give Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa the power to nominate any judge member of a committee in the absence of any member. In this article, we will delve deeper into the implications of this decision and break down each keyword to provide a better understanding of the situation.

## What is a Presidential Ordinance?

A presidential ordinance is an executive order issued by the President of a country under certain circumstances when the Parliament is not in session. This allows the government to take immediate action on urgent matters without having to wait for the approval of the Parliament. In the case of Pakistan, the President can issue ordinances under Article 89 of the Constitution.

In this particular instance, the government has decided to use a presidential ordinance to amend the practice and procedure act, which will have far-reaching implications on the judicial system in the country.

## How will this Amendment Impact the Practice and Procedure Act?

The amendment to the practice and procedure act will give Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa the power to nominate any judge member of a committee in the absence of any member. This means that Justice Isa will have the authority to appoint judges to key positions within the judiciary, which could potentially influence the direction of the legal system in the country.

This move has raised concerns among legal experts and members of the judiciary, who fear that it could undermine the independence of the judiciary and lead to political interference in the appointment of judges.

## Who is Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa?

Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa is a prominent figure in the legal community in Pakistan. He has served on the Supreme Court of Pakistan since 2014 and has been involved in several high-profile cases during his tenure. Justice Isa is known for his strong stance on judicial independence and has been a vocal critic of government interference in the judiciary.

Given his reputation and track record, the decision to give Justice Isa the power to nominate judges to key positions within the judiciary has raised eyebrows and sparked concerns about the potential implications of this move.

## What are the Implications of Giving CJP Justice Qazi Faez Isa the Power to Nominate Judges?

The decision to give Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa the power to nominate judges has far-reaching implications for the judicial system in the country. This move could potentially lead to increased politicization of the judiciary and undermine the independence of the legal system.

By allowing Justice Isa to appoint judges to key positions within the judiciary, the government is effectively giving him the power to influence the direction of the legal system and potentially shape the outcome of important cases. This has raised concerns about the potential for political interference in the judiciary and has sparked a debate about the need to safeguard the independence of the judiciary.

## How will this Decision Impact the Legal System in Pakistan?

The decision to amend the practice and procedure act through a presidential ordinance and give Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa the power to nominate judges will have a significant impact on the legal system in Pakistan. This move has the potential to undermine the independence of the judiciary and erode trust in the legal system.

Legal experts and members of the judiciary have raised concerns about the implications of this decision and have called for safeguards to protect the independence of the judiciary. The move has also sparked a debate about the need for transparency and accountability in the appointment of judges to key positions within the judiciary.

In conclusion, the decision by the government to amend the practice and procedure act through a presidential ordinance and give Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa the power to nominate judges has raised concerns about the independence of the judiciary and the potential for political interference in the legal system. It is essential to ensure that the judiciary remains independent and free from external influence to uphold the rule of law and protect the rights of all citizens.