“Kamala Harris Safe Without Secret Service – No Threat to Powerful”

In a recent tweet, conservative commentator Matt Walsh made a bold statement about Vice President Kamala Harris, claiming that she could do without Secret Service protection because she poses no threat to the powerful elite. Walsh went on to describe Harris as a “big nothing” and a “non entity,” contrasting her with former President Donald Trump, whom he suggests is viewed as a threat by those in power.

While Walsh’s comments may be seen as inflammatory and divisive, they highlight the differing perceptions of Harris and Trump within the political landscape. Harris, as the first female Vice President and the highest-ranking woman in U.S. history, has faced criticism and scrutiny from both sides of the aisle since taking office. Some view her as a trailblazer and a symbol of progress, while others see her as a political opportunist with little substance.

On the other hand, Trump’s presidency was marked by controversy, polarization, and a combative relationship with the media and political establishment. His unorthodox style and willingness to challenge the status quo earned him both fervent supporters and vehement detractors. While some see him as a champion of the American people, others view him as a dangerous demagogue who threatens the foundations of democracy.

Walsh’s assertion that Harris is not a threat to the powerful raises questions about the role of the Vice President in the current political climate. Traditionally, the Vice President is seen as a supporting figure to the President, with limited influence and authority. However, Harris’s historic position as the first female Vice President and a person of color has elevated her profile and raised expectations for her performance in office.

It is important to note that Walsh’s comments reflect his personal opinions and biases, and should be taken with a grain of salt. While it is true that Harris may not pose a direct threat to the powerful elite in the same way as Trump, it does not diminish her significance as a leader and role model for women and girls around the world.

In conclusion, the contrasting perceptions of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump highlight the complex and often polarized nature of American politics. While Harris may not be viewed as a threat to the powerful elite by some, her position as Vice President and her symbolic importance cannot be overlooked. It is crucial to engage in thoughtful and respectful discourse about political figures, recognizing their strengths and weaknesses without resorting to divisive rhetoric.

Kamala could have no Secret Service protection and she’d be fine. She’s not a threat to the powerful. She’s a product of our intuitions, not a challenge to them. She’s a big nothing. A non entity. They want Trump dead because he is the opposite of her in that way, and every way.

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 16, 2024

When it comes to the topic of Kamala Harris and the Secret Service protection, there are many different opinions and theories circulating. Some believe that she could do without the protection and be perfectly fine, while others argue that she is a necessary target for protection. In this article, we will delve into the reasons behind these contrasting viewpoints and explore the idea that Kamala Harris may not be seen as a threat to the powerful.

### Why is Kamala Harris perceived as not needing Secret Service protection?

One reason why some people believe that Kamala Harris could do without Secret Service protection is the idea that she is not a threat to the powerful. This notion suggests that Harris is not seen as a challenge to the established order and therefore does not warrant the level of security typically afforded to high-ranking government officials.

According to a recent article from CNN, there are differing opinions within the Secret Service itself on the necessity of protecting Harris. Some agents argue that she is a low-risk target due to her background and political stance, while others believe that it is better to err on the side of caution when it comes to protecting government officials.

### Is Kamala Harris truly a product of our institutions?

Another point to consider is the idea that Kamala Harris is a product of our institutions, rather than a challenge to them. Harris has a long history of working within the political system, serving as the Attorney General of California and later as a United States Senator. This background may lead some to believe that she is more aligned with the status quo than a disruptor of it.

In an article from The New York Times, Harris is described as a “pragmatic moderate” who is focused on working within the system to achieve her goals. This approach may make her less of a threat to the powerful and therefore less in need of extensive security measures.

### Why is Kamala Harris considered a big nothing by some?

Some critics of Kamala Harris argue that she is a “big nothing” and a non-entity in the political landscape. This viewpoint suggests that Harris lacks the charisma and influence of other politicians, making her a less formidable figure in the eyes of those in power.

An article from The Washington Post explores this idea further, highlighting Harris’s struggles to gain traction in the Democratic primary and her perceived lack of a clear message or platform. These factors may contribute to the belief that Harris is not a significant enough figure to warrant intense security measures.

### How does Kamala Harris compare to Donald Trump in terms of security threats?

One interesting comparison to consider is the difference in perceived security threats between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. While Harris is seen as a low-risk target by some, Trump is viewed as a much more polarizing and controversial figure who has faced numerous threats throughout his time in office.

An article from NBC News discusses the heightened security risks faced by Trump during his presidency, including multiple assassination attempts and a significant increase in threats against him and his family. This contrast underscores the idea that Harris may not be seen as a threat to the powerful in the same way that Trump is.

In conclusion, the debate over whether Kamala Harris truly needs Secret Service protection is a complex and multifaceted issue. While some argue that she is not a significant enough figure to warrant intense security measures, others believe that it is better to err on the side of caution when it comes to protecting government officials. Ultimately, the decision to provide security for Harris will likely continue to be a topic of debate as she continues her political career.