Supreme Court Debunks “151 mg Semen” Theory in Kolkata Hospital Rape Case

In a recent development, the Supreme Court has debunked the controversial “151 mg semen” theory in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case. The Chief Justice of India (CJI) reprimanded a lawyer for using social media arguments in court and presenting false information regarding the amount of semen found in the victim’s body. The CJI emphasized the importance of relying on factual evidence and the post-mortem report during legal proceedings.

The case, which has been making headlines for its gruesome nature, took a new turn as the Supreme Court intervened to set the record straight. The lawyer’s claim of 151 mg of semen being found in the victim’s body was not supported by the post-mortem report, leading the CJI to question the validity of such statements. This incident serves as a reminder of the dangers of spreading misinformation and the importance of adhering to the facts in a court of law.

The Supreme Court’s decision to debunk the “151 mg semen” theory highlights the need for accurate and reliable information in legal proceedings. In a case as sensitive and serious as a rape and murder investigation, it is crucial to base arguments and decisions on concrete evidence rather than speculation or hearsay. The CJI’s reprimand of the lawyer serves as a warning to all legal practitioners to exercise caution and integrity in their arguments.

The controversy surrounding the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case has sparked outrage and debate across the country. The victim’s family, as well as the general public, have been closely following the developments in the case, hoping for justice to be served. The Supreme Court’s intervention to clarify the misinformation surrounding the amount of semen found in the victim’s body is a step in the right direction towards ensuring a fair and transparent legal process.

As the case continues to unfold, it is important for all parties involved to prioritize the truth and uphold the principles of justice. The Supreme Court’s stance on the “151 mg semen” theory serves as a reminder of the need for honesty and integrity in the pursuit of justice. In a case as sensitive and high-profile as this, it is essential for all stakeholders to act responsibly and ethically to ensure a just outcome.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s debunking of the “151 mg semen” theory in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case is a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings. The court’s emphasis on relying on factual evidence and refraining from using social media arguments sets a precedent for future cases. It is crucial for all legal practitioners to adhere to the highest standards of professionalism and integrity in their arguments to uphold the principles of justice and fairness.

Breaking:

Supreme Court debunks the “151 mg semen” theory in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case. “Don’t use social media arguments in court” CJI raps lawyer who said that 151 mg of semen was found in the victim’s body. “We have the post mortem report before us. We… pic.twitter.com/aAuiUBRIPj

— Mahua Moitra Fans (@MahuaMoitraFans) August 22, 2024

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of India has debunked the controversial “151 mg semen” theory that was presented in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case. The Chief Justice of India (CJI) had strong words for the lawyer who brought up this theory in court, stating, “Don’t use social media arguments in court.” The CJI emphasized that the court relies on concrete evidence, such as the post mortem report, rather than unfounded claims.

What was the “151 mg semen” theory?

The “151 mg semen” theory was a claim made by a lawyer in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case, suggesting that 151 milligrams of semen were found in the victim’s body. This theory sparked outrage and controversy, as it seemed to be based on speculation rather than solid evidence.

What did the Supreme Court say about this theory?

The Supreme Court firmly rejected the “151 mg semen” theory, with the Chief Justice of India admonishing the lawyer who brought it up in court. The CJI emphasized the importance of relying on factual evidence, such as the post mortem report, in legal proceedings. The court made it clear that social media arguments have no place in the courtroom.

What evidence did the court rely on?

The court based its decision on the post mortem report of the victim, which provided crucial information about the cause of death and any injuries sustained. This report served as the primary source of evidence in the case, helping to debunk the unfounded claims made by the lawyer regarding the presence of semen in the victim’s body.

How did the court address the use of social media arguments?

The Chief Justice of India issued a strong rebuke against the lawyer who brought up the “151 mg semen” theory, warning against the use of social media arguments in court. The CJI emphasized the need for concrete evidence and factual information, rather than unsubstantiated claims that can lead to misinformation and confusion.

In light of this ruling, it is evident that the court takes a firm stance against the use of unreliable sources and unfounded theories in legal proceedings. The emphasis on factual evidence and the rejection of social media arguments highlight the importance of upholding the integrity of the justice system.

Overall, the Supreme Court’s debunking of the “151 mg semen” theory in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case serves as a reminder of the importance of relying on concrete evidence and factual information in legal proceedings. By emphasizing the need for reliable sources and rejecting baseless claims, the court upholds the integrity of the justice system and ensures that justice is served fairly and impartially.

Sources:
– Supreme Court of India official website
– Times of India
– NDTV