TMC MP Sukhendu Roy Summoned by Kolkata Police for Questioning

In a recent turn of events, Trinamool Congress MP Sukhendu Roy has been summoned by the Kolkata police for demanding the custodial interrogation of the Police Commissioner and former RG Kar principal. The MP raised questions about the use of a sniffer dog three days after an incident and the demolition of a wall in a hall.

Roy has been asked to appear before the authorities to provide further information on his statements. This development has sparked controversy and raised eyebrows among political circles and the public alike.

The summons comes amidst a backdrop of heightened tensions and scrutiny of law enforcement practices. Roy’s vocal criticism of the police commissioner and school principal has put him in the spotlight and drawn attention to issues of transparency and accountability within the system.

As the situation unfolds, many are closely watching to see how Roy will respond to the summons and what implications it may have for his political career. The investigation into the events in question is ongoing, and more details are expected to emerge in the coming days.

Overall, this latest development underscores the importance of holding those in positions of power accountable for their actions. It serves as a reminder that no one is above the law, and that transparency and integrity are essential components of a functioning democracy.

BIG BREAKING NEWS TMC MP Sukehndu Roy summoned by Kolkata police for demanding custodial interrogation of Police Commissioner & former RG Kar principal.

He had asked “Why sniffer dog was used after 3 days?
Why wall of hall demolished?”

He has been asked to appear before… pic.twitter.com/nkBHwbskbG

— Times Algebra (@TimesAlgebraIND) August 18, 2024

Why was a sniffer dog used after 3 days?

The recent development involving TMC MP Sukhendu Roy being summoned by Kolkata police has sparked controversy and raised questions about the handling of the case. One of the key questions that Roy raised was why a sniffer dog was used three days after the incident took place. This delay in using a sniffer dog could potentially impact the integrity of any evidence that may have been present at the scene. It also raises concerns about the thoroughness of the police investigation into the matter.

According to reports, Roy’s questioning of the timing of the sniffer dog’s involvement has put pressure on the police to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay. The use of a sniffer dog is a standard procedure in many investigations, especially in cases involving potential criminal activity. The fact that it was not utilized until three days after the incident occurred is certainly cause for concern.

Why was the wall of the hall demolished?

Another question that Roy raised during his statement was why the wall of the hall where the incident took place was demolished. This action could potentially tamper with any evidence that may have been present at the scene, further complicating the investigation. The demolition of the wall raises questions about the transparency and integrity of the police handling of the case.

Reports suggest that Roy’s questioning of the demolition of the wall has added another layer of complexity to the ongoing investigation. The decision to demolish the wall without proper authorization or consultation with relevant authorities raises red flags about the motives behind such actions. It is essential for the police to provide a valid explanation for why the wall was demolished and how it may have impacted the investigation.

What are the implications of demanding custodial interrogation of Police Commissioner & former RG Kar principal?

By demanding custodial interrogation of the Police Commissioner and former RG Kar principal, Roy has escalated the situation and put additional pressure on the authorities to provide answers. Custodial interrogation is a serious step that involves questioning individuals while they are in police custody. This move indicates Roy’s belief that these individuals may have crucial information related to the case that needs to be uncovered.

The demand for custodial interrogation also raises concerns about the potential misuse of power and authority in the investigation. It is essential for the process to be conducted fairly and transparently, with respect for the rights of all individuals involved. The implications of such a demand are significant and could have far-reaching consequences for the case and those involved.

In conclusion, the summoning of TMC MP Sukhendu Roy by Kolkata police for his statements regarding the handling of the case raises important questions about the integrity and transparency of the investigation. Roy’s inquiries into the timing of the sniffer dog’s involvement, the demolition of the hall wall, and the demand for custodial interrogation of key individuals highlight the need for a thorough and unbiased examination of the facts. It is crucial for the authorities to address these questions and provide satisfactory explanations to ensure a fair and just resolution to the case.