Obituary – Death – Cause of Death News : The attempted assassination of Donald Trump by Thomas Mathew Crooks draws parallels to an assassination attempt on former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1986. The assassination attempt on Gandhi was one of many foiled plots against him during his tumultuous tenure. The foiled attempts on Gandhi’s life were driven by political motives and aimed to change the course of history.
One such attempt occurred at Rajghat, where a lone assailant hid in plain sight on top of a gazebo, armed with a country-made revolver. The assailant fired shots at Gandhi as he visited the Gandhi samadhi, but luckily, no one was seriously injured. The assailant, identified as Karamjit Singh, was eventually apprehended after security personnel fired shots at him.
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
The foiled assassination attempts on Gandhi highlight the dangers faced by political leaders who make difficult decisions. Despite facing numerous threats on his life, Gandhi continued to lead India with courage and resilience. The parallels between the assassination attempts on Gandhi and Trump serve as a stark reminder of the risks political leaders face in the line of duty. In his book “Intelligence Over the Centuries,” former special secretary at the Research and Analysis Wing, Vappala Balachandran, recounts the shocking events surrounding the assassination attempt on Prime Minister Gandhi at Rajghat. Despite specific intelligence received about a potential attack, security personnel failed to search the structure where the perpetrator, Karamjit, had hidden. Karamjit, acting alone, sought revenge for the massacre of Sikhs following Indira Gandhi’s assassination. His motive was fueled by hearing Gandhi justify the 1984 riots with the infamous words, “when a big tree falls…”
Karamjit’s meticulous planning and determination to carry out the assassination were evident as he spent days hidden in the gazebo at Rajghat, evading security checks. His failed attempt, unlike that of Crooks, who was swiftly taken out by a Secret Service sniper, raised questions about the lapses in security measures. The consequences of Karamjit’s success could have been catastrophic, especially in a country still reeling from political upheaval and violence.
The incident shed light on the fragile security situation in the country at the time and highlighted the importance of thorough intelligence analysis and coordination among agencies. Karamjit’s capture alive helped uncover his motives and determine whether he acted alone or had accomplices. The failed assassination attempt serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced in ensuring the safety of political leaders in turbulent times.
How Rajiv assassination bid was similar to Trump’s, with a crucial difference
What similarities can be drawn between the Rajiv assassination bid and Trump’s?
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
Both the Rajiv Gandhi assassination bid in 1991 and the recent attempt on Donald Trump’s life bear some striking resemblances. In both cases, the assailants were able to get dangerously close to their targets, highlighting a serious lapse in security protocols.
During the Rajiv Gandhi incident, a suicide bomber was able to approach the former Prime Minister, leading to a tragic loss of life. Similarly, in the case of Donald Trump, an individual was able to breach security and come within close proximity to the President, posing a significant threat.
Furthermore, the motivations behind both attacks were fueled by political ideologies and personal grievances. The perpetrators sought to make a statement and incite fear through their violent actions.
What crucial difference sets these two incidents apart?
While there are clear similarities between the Rajiv assassination bid and the attempt on Trump’s life, there is one crucial difference that sets them apart. In the case of Rajiv Gandhi, the assailant was successful in carrying out the attack, resulting in a tragic loss of life.
On the other hand, the attempt on Donald Trump’s life was thwarted by law enforcement, preventing any harm to the President. This crucial difference underscores the importance of robust security measures and quick response times in preventing such tragic events.
Overall, while both incidents share commonalities in terms of motivations and security vulnerabilities, the outcome of the attacks highlights the importance of effective security protocols and swift action in protecting high-profile individuals.
How can we learn from these incidents to prevent future attacks?
It is essential to closely examine the security lapses that allowed the assailants to get close to their targets in both the Rajiv Gandhi and Trump incidents. By identifying and addressing these weaknesses, security agencies can better protect public figures from potential threats.
Additionally, increased vigilance and intelligence gathering can help in preempting such attacks before they occur. By staying ahead of potential threats and continuously evaluating and improving security protocols, we can mitigate the risk of future incidents.
Ultimately, learning from past tragedies and taking proactive measures is crucial in safeguarding the lives of our leaders and preventing similar attacks in the future.
Overall, while the Rajiv assassination bid and the attempt on Trump’s life share similarities in terms of motivations and security vulnerabilities, the crucial difference lies in the outcome of the attacks. By analyzing these incidents and implementing necessary security measures, we can work towards preventing future attacks on high-profile individuals.
