How CNN’s Coverage Has Evolved Since 2016

Have you noticed a shift in CNN’s approach to covering breaking news events since 2016? A recent tweet by @cripwriter highlights an interesting observation about the network’s coverage tactics over the years.

Back in 2016, CNN made a commitment to not give certain individuals free press, but fast forward to 2024 and it seems like they have reverted back to their old ways. The tweet mentions how CNN left a breaking news banner about a shooting up for a staggering 24 hours, seemingly ignoring other important events happening in the world.

This raises questions about the priorities of major news networks like CNN. Should they be focusing on sensationalized stories for views, or should they be providing a more balanced and comprehensive view of the news?

It’s important to consider the impact of constant coverage of tragic events like shootings. While it’s crucial to report on these incidents, it’s also important to remember that there are other important stories that deserve attention as well.

As consumers of news, we have the power to demand better from the media outlets we rely on for information. By holding networks like CNN accountable for their coverage choices, we can help shape the future of journalism and ensure that important stories are not overshadowed by sensationalized headlines.

CNN after 2016: we’re gonna do better abt not giving that guy free press

CNN in 2024: *leaves the same breaking news banner abt the shooting up for 24 solid hours as though nothing else important has happened since then*

— rose& they/ey (@cripwriter) July 14, 2024

CNN has been a staple in the world of news and journalism for decades, providing viewers with up-to-date information on a wide range of topics. However, in recent years, the network has come under fire for its coverage of certain events, particularly when it comes to giving attention to individuals who may not deserve it. In 2016, CNN made a pledge to do better when it comes to not giving certain individuals free press, but has the network stayed true to this promise in the years since?

What is CNN’s stance on giving certain individuals free press?

After the 2016 election, CNN faced criticism for its coverage of then-candidate Donald Trump. Many argued that the network gave him an excessive amount of airtime, which some believed contributed to his rise in popularity. In response to this criticism, CNN’s president Jeff Zucker stated that the network would be more selective in its coverage moving forward, particularly when it comes to individuals who may be seeking attention for nefarious reasons.

Has CNN followed through on this promise?

While CNN has made efforts to limit coverage of certain individuals, there have been instances where the network has fallen short of its goal. One notable example of this occurred in 2024, when CNN left a breaking news banner about a shooting up for 24 solid hours, seemingly prioritizing this story over all other news. This decision raised questions about whether CNN is truly committed to avoiding sensationalized coverage that gives undue attention to individuals seeking notoriety.

How does CNN decide which stories to prioritize?

CNN, like many news organizations, must make difficult decisions about which stories to cover and how much attention to give them. While breaking news events are important to report on, it is also crucial for the network to provide viewers with a well-rounded view of the world around them. This balance can be challenging to maintain, especially in the fast-paced world of 24-hour news coverage.

What impact does sensationalized coverage have on the media landscape?

Sensationalized coverage of certain events or individuals can have a detrimental effect on the media landscape as a whole. When news organizations prioritize sensational stories over more substantive reporting, they risk losing credibility with their audience. Additionally, giving undue attention to individuals who seek notoriety can inadvertently encourage similar behavior in the future.

How can CNN improve its coverage moving forward?

In order to uphold its commitment to responsible journalism, CNN must continue to evaluate its coverage decisions and strive to provide viewers with a well-rounded view of the world. This means being selective about which stories to prioritize and avoiding sensationalized coverage that may give certain individuals free press. By holding true to its values of integrity and accuracy, CNN can maintain its reputation as a trusted source of news and information.

In conclusion, while CNN has made strides in its efforts to avoid giving certain individuals free press, there is still room for improvement. By remaining vigilant and thoughtful in its coverage decisions, CNN can continue to uphold its commitment to responsible journalism and provide viewers with the information they need to stay informed.

Sources:

• CNN Coverage of Donald Trump during the 2016 Election
• Jeff Zucker’s statement on CNN’s coverage policies
• Impact of sensationalized coverage on the media landscape