1. Alex Murdaugh seeks South Carolina Supreme Court review of Judge Toal’s tampering ruling
2. Murdaugh appeals Toal’s jury tampering decision to SC Supreme Court.
Accident – Death – Obituary News :
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
Attorneys representing convicted murderer and financial fraudster Alex Murdaugh have submitted a petition to the South Carolina Supreme Court, urging the justices to reconsider a lower court’s decision regarding alleged jury tampering by Colleton County clerk of court, Becky Hill.
The petition comes after a judge’s ruling last winter denied Murdaugh’s request for a new trial based on the jury tampering allegations. The Supreme Court is now tasked with reviewing the case, though a timeline for their decision remains uncertain.
Background of the Case
Alex Murdaugh, once a prominent figure in South Carolina’s legal community and a member of a powerful legal dynasty, was convicted in March 2023 of the murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at their rural estate in June 2021. The trial, which lasted six weeks, culminated in a Colleton County jury delivering a swift guilty verdict after just over an hour of deliberation.
Currently serving two consecutive life sentences at the South Carolina Department of Corrections, Murdaugh’s legal team, comprised of Dick Harpootlian, Jim Griffin, and Phil Barber, launched an investigation post-trial. They interviewed jurors and alleged that Becky Hill had improperly influenced the jury to expedite the guilty verdict to boost sales of her book, “Behind the Doors of Justice,” which was released shortly after the trial.
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
Allegations Against Becky Hill
The attorneys claimed that Hill, in her capacity as clerk of court, had access to insider information about the trial proceedings. As clerks of court oversee the jurors during trials and maintain close contact with them, Hill was accused of leveraging her position to gather information that could have influenced the jurors’ decision-making process.
Further complicating matters, Hill’s book was withdrawn from publication after it was revealed that she had plagiarized key sections from a draft by a veteran BBC reporter. The unethical conduct raised questions about the integrity of the trial and the impartiality of the jury.
Legal Proceedings and Future Steps
While the jury tampering allegations are distinct from the murder conviction, Murdaugh’s legal team plans to file an appeal with the South Carolina Court of Appeals later this summer. The case is poised to undergo further scrutiny as the legal battle continues.
As this story unfolds, stay tuned for updates on the developments in the Alex Murdaugh case.
.
“Alex Murdaugh S.C. Supreme Court review Judge Toal’s jury tampering decision”.
