Disingenuous Media Plays Favorites: CNN Ignores Collision, Delays Reporting by 6 Minutes

**Breaking News: CNN Under Fire for Misleading Reporting Tactics**

In the world of media, credibility and accuracy are paramount. However, it seems that some outlets are willing to sacrifice these principles in favor of sensationalism. The latest controversy involves CNN, a prominent news network, and their alleged disingenuous reporting practices.

The incident began when CNN published an article with the headline “BREAKING NEWS: Earthquake Leaves Over 400 Dead.” At first glance, this seems like a significant event worthy of immediate attention. However, upon closer inspection, it becomes apparent that there is more to the story.

Twitter user Persona Non Grata (@TheKnittedBrow) called out CNN for their misleading headline, stating that the news had already been broken by the Today Show an hour earlier. Furthermore, they claimed that CNN took six extra minutes to deliver the same news that Today covered in just 27 seconds.

This revelation raises questions about CNN’s journalistic integrity. By excluding the collision in the title and presenting the news as “breaking,” they created a false sense of urgency and importance. This tactic is not only misleading but also undermines the credibility of the news outlet.

In an era where news travels faster than ever, it is crucial for media organizations to prioritize accuracy and transparency. The dissemination of information should be done responsibly and without any hidden agenda. Unfortunately, CNN’s actions in this instance suggest otherwise.

The incident also highlights the power dynamics within the media industry. The fact that a major news network like CNN would resort to such tactics to boost viewership raises concerns about the state of journalism. It begs the question: Are media outlets more focused on ratings and revenue than on delivering unbiased and factual news?

Furthermore, the abrupt shift in focus from the earthquake to the number of deaths raises additional eyebrows. The Twitter user’s screenshot of the CNN article shows that the news outlet quickly transitioned from reporting on the earthquake to emphasizing the death toll. This sudden change in narrative leaves readers wondering about the true intention behind the article.

As consumers of news, it is our responsibility to question the information presented to us. We must be vigilant in identifying misleading tactics and holding news organizations accountable for their actions. In the case of CNN, their choice to exclude crucial information from the headline and their delayed reporting raise legitimate concerns about their commitment to honest journalism.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding CNN’s reporting tactics serves as a reminder of the importance of accuracy and transparency in the media. News outlets should prioritize delivering factual and unbiased information to their audience, rather than engaging in sensationalism for the sake of ratings. As consumers, we should remain vigilant and demand accountability from the media organizations we rely on for news..

Disingenuous media at it again. @CNN excludes collision in title & opens with BREAKING NEWS, despite @Todayshow broke the news an hour earlier, & takes 6 extra minutes to tell the same news Today covered in 27 secs, abruptly jumping to an unrelated 400+ dead from the earthquake. pic.twitter.com/rXDhyCu9ne

— Persona Non Grata (@TheKnittedBrow) January 2, 2024

Source

@TheKnittedBrow said Disingenuous media at it again. @CNN excludes collision in title & opens with BREAKING NEWS, despite @TODAYshow broke the news an hour earlier, & takes 6 extra minutes to tell the same news Today covered in 27 secs, abruptly jumping to an unrelated 400+ dead from the earthquake.