Breaking News: Jill Underly’s Controversial Facebook Block

In a surprising turn of events in Wisconsin’s educational landscape, Jill Underly, the incumbent Superintendent of Public Instruction, recently found herself at the center of a social media controversy. Corey A. DeAngelis, a prominent advocate for school choice, took to Twitter to reveal that Underly had blocked him on Facebook shortly after he publicly called out her perceived hypocrisy regarding educational policies. This incident has ignited discussions about Underly’s reelection campaign and her stance on key issues affecting Wisconsin schools.

Who is Jill Underly?

Jill Underly was elected as Wisconsin’s Superintendent of Public Instruction in 2021, a position that has significant influence over the state’s public education system. She has been an advocate for various educational initiatives and reforms aimed at improving the quality of education for Wisconsin’s students. As Underly gears up for her reelection campaign, her policies and actions are under increased scrutiny from both supporters and opponents.

The Facebook Block Incident

The incident that has captured public attention involves DeAngelis, a well-known figure in the school choice movement. He criticized Underly’s approach to educational policies and accused her of hypocrisy regarding her support for public schools while simultaneously opposing school choice initiatives. Following his critique, Underly promptly blocked him on Facebook, an action that has been interpreted as an attempt to silence dissent and avoid accountability.

Implications for Underly’s Reelection Campaign

As Underly prepares for her reelection bid, this incident raises questions about her willingness to engage with critics and her commitment to transparency. The ability to communicate openly with constituents and address concerns is crucial for any candidate, especially in a position that impacts the lives of thousands of students and families. Underly’s decision to block a prominent critic may be viewed as a defensive move that could alienate potential voters.

The School Choice Debate

The broader context of this controversy is the ongoing debate over school choice in Wisconsin. Advocates argue that school choice empowers parents to select the best educational options for their children, whether that be public, private, or charter schools. Opponents, including some public school advocates, contend that expanding school choice undermines public education funding and leads to greater inequities in educational access.

Underly’s stance on school choice has been a pivotal aspect of her tenure as Superintendent. Critics, like DeAngelis, argue that her policies favor traditional public schools at the expense of alternative educational options, which could benefit students in underserved areas. This latest incident could be a turning point in how voters perceive her commitment to educational equity and reform.

The Role of Social Media in Political Campaigning

Social media has become an essential tool for political campaigning, allowing candidates to connect with voters, share their messages, and respond to criticism in real-time. However, the way candidates engage with their critics can significantly impact their public image. Underly’s decision to block DeAngelis raises questions about her willingness to confront opposing viewpoints and engage in constructive dialogue.

In an era where transparency and accountability are highly valued by voters, candidates who appear to avoid criticism may find themselves facing backlash. As the election approaches, how Underly navigates social media interactions and addresses criticism will be closely watched by both her supporters and detractors.

Conclusion

The recent Facebook incident involving Jill Underly and Corey A. DeAngelis highlights the complexities of political campaigning in the age of social media. As Underly seeks reelection as Wisconsin’s Superintendent of Public Instruction, her decisions and actions will undoubtedly be scrutinized by voters. The ongoing debate over school choice and her approach to educational policies will play a crucial role in shaping her campaign narrative.

As the election draws nearer, it will be interesting to observe how Underly responds to the criticism and whether she can effectively communicate her vision for Wisconsin’s education system. The implications of this controversy extend beyond social media, potentially influencing the future of educational policy in the state and the direction of her campaign. Voters will be looking for a candidate who not only champions educational reform but also demonstrates a willingness to engage with all stakeholders in the conversation about Wisconsin’s educational future.

BREAKING: Jill Underly blocked me on Facebook right after I called her out her hypocrisy

She’s running for reelection as Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction. pic.twitter.com/3Bq09t81xw

— Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist (@DeAngelisCorey) March 31, 2025

BRAKING: Jill Underly blocked me on Facebook right after I called her out her hypocrisy

You might have caught wind of the recent social media drama surrounding Jill Underly, the Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction. In a rather surprising twist, Corey A. DeAngelis, a well-known school choice advocate, announced that he was blocked by Underly on Facebook immediately after he confronted her about what he perceived as hypocrisy in her policies. This incident has sparked a lot of discussions about the current state of education in Wisconsin and the implications for Underly’s reelection campaign.

Who is Jill Underly?

Jill Underly is a prominent educational figure in Wisconsin, currently serving as the Superintendent of Public Instruction. She has been a vocal advocate for public education and has emphasized the importance of equitable access to quality education for all students. Underly’s approach has been characterized by a commitment to addressing the diverse needs of Wisconsin’s student population.

However, her tenure has not been without controversy. Critics argue that her policies may not fully align with the needs of students and families, particularly when it comes to school choice and parental involvement. This delicate balance between advocating for public education while responding to calls for school choice has put her in the spotlight, especially now that she is gearing up for reelection.

The Hypocrisy Accusation

DeAngelis, who has been a staunch advocate for school choice, took to Facebook to call out Underly on what he views as her hypocritical stance regarding education reform. His claim centers around the idea that while Underly promotes public education, she has not been fully supportive of measures that would grant parents more choices when it comes to their children’s education. This has raised eyebrows among parents and educators who are passionate about having more options available for their children.

The incident highlights a broader debate about educational policy in Wisconsin. Many parents and educators are increasingly vocal about wanting more options beyond traditional public schools. This has led to a growing movement advocating for charter schools, private school vouchers, and homeschooling. Underly’s response to these sentiments will likely play a significant role in how her reelection campaign unfolds.

Social Media and Political Discourse

The way political discourse happens today has changed dramatically, largely thanks to social media. Platforms like Facebook and Twitter have become battlegrounds for ideas, opinions, and criticisms. In this case, DeAngelis’s public call-out of Underly not only drew attention to her policies but also showcased how quickly and dramatically political relationships can shift in the digital age.

Blocking someone on social media can be seen as a defensive move, especially for public figures trying to maintain a specific image. Underly’s decision to block DeAngelis might raise questions about her willingness to engage with criticism. In an age where transparency and communication are key, her actions could be interpreted as avoidance rather than an opportunity for dialogue.

The Implications for Underly’s Reelection

As Underly prepares for her reelection campaign, the stakes are high. The educational landscape in Wisconsin is evolving, and parents are increasingly looking for leadership that aligns with their desires for school choice. Underly’s ability to respond to criticisms and engage with opposing viewpoints will be crucial in winning over voters.

If she continues to be perceived as dismissive of alternative educational options, she could alienate a significant portion of the electorate. On the other hand, if she can effectively communicate her vision for public education while addressing the concerns of school choice advocates, she may strengthen her position.

The Role of School Choice in Wisconsin

School choice has been a hot topic in Wisconsin for several years. The idea is simple: parents should have the ability to choose the best educational environment for their children, whether it be a public school, charter school, private school, or homeschooling. Advocates argue that this choice leads to better educational outcomes and more tailored learning experiences for students.

However, opponents of school choice often argue that it can divert funds away from public schools, ultimately harming those institutions that serve a majority of students. The debate is complex, and the implications of these discussions extend beyond politics—they affect the lives of students and families throughout the state.

How This Incident Reflects Broader Educational Trends

The confrontation between DeAngelis and Underly is emblematic of a larger trend in educational policy discussions across the country. Many states are grappling with how to balance traditional public education with the growing demand for school choice options. This incident serves as a microcosm of the challenges faced by educational leaders who must navigate differing expectations from parents, educators, and policymakers.

Engagement with critics, like DeAngelis, is essential for any candidate, especially in a contentious political environment. The willingness to debate and discuss differing viewpoints can help build trust and credibility with constituents. For Underly, this means finding a way to address the concerns of those advocating for school choice while remaining committed to her vision for public education.

The Future of Wisconsin Education

As Wisconsin moves forward, the educational landscape will continue to evolve. The outcomes of the upcoming elections could have lasting impacts on how education is delivered in the state. The debate between public education and school choice will remain at the forefront of these discussions, influencing policy decisions and funding allocations.

Voters will be looking for candidates who not only support effective educational policies but also demonstrate a willingness to engage with all stakeholders in the conversation. For Underly, this could mean rethinking her communication strategy and being more open to dialogue with critics, especially if she wants to secure her position as Superintendent.

In summary, the incident involving Jill Underly and Corey A. DeAngelis encapsulates the tensions present in today’s educational debates. As the political landscape continues to shift, it will be fascinating to see how these discussions play out in Wisconsin and what they mean for the future of education in the state. Balancing the needs of all students, while remaining responsive to the demands for choice, will be a pivotal challenge for Underly and her opponents in the upcoming election.