Reports have surfaced indicating that Serbian police utilized a sonic weapon known as an LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device) during a significant student-led protest in Belgrade, Serbia on March 15, 2025. The LRAD is an American-made system developed and manufactured by Genasys Inc., a company based in San Diego.
The use of the LRAD in the protest has sparked controversy and raised concerns about the escalation of force by law enforcement in response to demonstrations. The LRAD is designed to emit high-decibel sound waves that can be used for long-range communication or to disperse crowds by causing discomfort or pain to individuals within its range.
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.
The decision to deploy the LRAD in Belgrade has drawn criticism from human rights organizations and activists, who argue that the use of such a weapon against peaceful protesters is a violation of their rights to freedom of expression and assembly. They have called for an investigation into the incident and for accountability for those responsible for ordering and using the LRAD.
The use of sonic weapons like the LRAD in crowd control situations is not new, with similar devices being utilized in protests and demonstrations around the world. However, the use of these technologies raises ethical questions about the appropriate use of force by law enforcement and the potential for harm to civilians.
In response to the reports of the LRAD being used in Belgrade, the Serbian government has stated that it was necessary to maintain public order and prevent violence during the protest. They have defended the use of the LRAD as a non-lethal means of crowd control and have denied any wrongdoing in its deployment.
The incident in Belgrade highlights the ongoing debate around the militarization of law enforcement and the use of force against civilians in protest situations. Advocates for police reform argue that the use of technologies like the LRAD can escalate tensions and lead to unnecessary violence, while supporters of law enforcement maintain that such tools are necessary to maintain public safety and order.
As the investigation into the use of the LRAD in Belgrade continues, the debate over the appropriate use of force by law enforcement in response to protests is likely to intensify. Human rights organizations and activists will continue to push for accountability and transparency in policing practices, while governments and law enforcement agencies will need to balance public safety concerns with respect for civil liberties.
UPDATE: Reports indicate that Serbian police used a sonic weapon called an LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device), during the huge student-led protest in Belgrade, Serbia on March 15, 2025. The American-made system, developed and manufactured by Genasys Inc., a company based in San… https://t.co/wD8IQdR9vn
— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) March 16, 2025
The recent events in Belgrade, Serbia have sparked outrage and concern around the world. Reports have surfaced indicating that Serbian police utilized a sonic weapon known as an LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device) during a large student-led protest on March 15, 2025. This American-made system was developed and manufactured by Genasys Inc., a company based in San Diego. The use of such a powerful weapon against peaceful protesters raises serious questions about the escalation of force by law enforcement.
The LRAD is a device that emits high-decibel sound waves in a directed manner, causing intense discomfort and potential hearing damage to those in its path. While originally designed for long-range communication and crowd control, its use in a protest setting has sparked controversy due to its potential for causing harm. The decision to deploy such a weapon against unarmed civilians has drawn criticism from human rights organizations and sparked debate about the appropriate use of force by authorities.
The use of sonic weapons in crowd control situations is not new, but the deployment of an LRAD in a protest setting raises ethical and legal questions. International human rights law prohibits the use of excessive force against peaceful protesters, and the use of potentially harmful weapons such as the LRAD raises concerns about the protection of fundamental rights.
In response to the reports of the LRAD’s use in Belgrade, many have called for an independent investigation into the incident. It is essential that authorities be held accountable for their actions and that measures be taken to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future. The use of force against peaceful protesters is a violation of basic human rights and should be condemned by the international community.
As we reflect on the events in Belgrade, it is crucial to remember the importance of upholding human rights and protecting the right to peaceful protest. The use of force, especially in the form of potentially harmful weapons such as the LRAD, should be a last resort and only used when absolutely necessary to protect public safety. The international community must remain vigilant in monitoring and addressing instances of excessive force by authorities and hold those responsible accountable for their actions.
In conclusion, the reports of Serbian police using an LRAD during the recent protest in Belgrade are deeply concerning and highlight the need for greater oversight and accountability in the use of force by law enforcement. The protection of fundamental rights, including the right to peaceful protest, is essential to a democratic society, and any violations of these rights must be met with swift and decisive action. The international community must stand together in condemning the use of excessive force and working towards a more just and peaceful world for all.