In a shocking development, the Washington Free Beacon has revealed that Columbia University has made the decision to slash $30 million in funding, with a significant portion of that amount – $2 million – being allocated to support Jeanine D’Armiento, the chair of the University Senate Executive Committee. This move comes amidst growing controversy surrounding D’Armiento’s role in obstructing disciplinary action against individuals involved in pro-terror and anti-Semitic activities on campus.
Jeanine D’Armiento has emerged as a central figure in the debate over how universities should address instances of hate speech and extremist behavior within their student body. Her actions, or lack thereof, in response to these incidents have sparked outrage among students, faculty, and the wider community. Many have accused her of turning a blind eye to the troubling rise of anti-Semitic sentiment and terrorist sympathies on campus, and have called for her removal from her position of authority.
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.
The decision to cut funding for D’Armiento and the University Senate Executive Committee reflects a growing discontent with the way Columbia University has handled these sensitive issues. The $30 million reduction in funding sends a clear message that the university is taking a firm stance against those who fail to uphold its values of inclusivity and tolerance. By targeting D’Armiento specifically, Columbia is signaling that it will not tolerate individuals who condone or enable behavior that goes against the principles of a safe and welcoming academic environment.
This news has sent shockwaves through the Columbia community and beyond, with many applauding the university for taking a stand against those who seek to sow division and hatred on campus. The decision to cut funding for D’Armiento is seen as a necessary step towards restoring trust and accountability within the university leadership, and ensuring that all students feel safe and respected in their academic environment.
As the story continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how D’Armiento and the University Senate Executive Committee will respond to this significant blow to their funding. Will they acknowledge the concerns raised by the community and take steps to address them, or will they continue to defend their actions and risk further alienating themselves from the broader university community? Only time will tell.
In conclusion, the decision by Columbia University to cut $30 million in funding, including $2 million supporting Jeanine D’Armiento, signals a turning point in the ongoing debate over how universities should address hate speech and extremist behavior on campus. This bold move demonstrates the university’s commitment to upholding its values of inclusivity and tolerance, and sends a clear message that those who fail to uphold these principles will face consequences. It remains to be seen how D’Armiento and the University Senate Executive Committee will respond to this development, but one thing is certain – the Columbia community is watching closely.
BREAKING: The Washington Free Beacon reports that Columbia cut $30M in funding Friday—including $2M supporting Jeanine D’Armiento, chair of the University Senate Exec. Committee.
D’Armiento was the leading force blocking discipline for pro-terror, anti-Semitic protesters.
— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) March 16, 2025
In recent news, it has been reported by The Washington Free Beacon that Columbia University has made the decision to cut $30 million in funding. This includes a significant $2 million that was previously allocated to support Jeanine D’Armiento, who serves as the chair of the University Senate Executive Committee. The decision to reduce funding for D’Armiento comes after she was identified as the main obstacle blocking disciplinary actions against individuals who have been involved in supporting pro-terror and anti-Semitic activities on campus.
This move by Columbia University has stirred up a significant amount of controversy and debate among students, faculty, and the wider community. Many are questioning the university’s decision to cut funding for D’Armiento, especially considering her role in blocking disciplinary actions against those involved in promoting extremist views on campus. The decision has raised concerns about the university’s commitment to upholding values of inclusivity, diversity, and tolerance.
The Washington Free Beacon’s report sheds light on the complexities and challenges that universities face when addressing issues related to free speech, academic freedom, and campus safety. It highlights the delicate balance that institutions like Columbia must maintain between protecting individuals’ right to express their views and ensuring that those views do not promote hatred, violence, or discrimination.
The decision to cut funding for D’Armiento raises important questions about the role of university leaders in promoting a safe and inclusive campus environment. It also underscores the need for universities to have clear policies and procedures in place to address instances of hate speech, discrimination, and violence on campus. By taking a stand against individuals who promote extremist views, universities can send a strong message that such behavior will not be tolerated within academic communities.
It is essential for universities to prioritize the safety and well-being of all members of their community, regardless of their background, beliefs, or opinions. By holding individuals accountable for their actions and words, universities can create a more inclusive and respectful environment where all students, faculty, and staff feel valued and respected.
The decision by Columbia University to cut funding for D’Armiento serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding values of tolerance, respect, and diversity within academic institutions. It also highlights the need for university leaders to take a proactive stance against hate speech, discrimination, and violence on campus. By addressing these issues head-on, universities can foster a more inclusive and supportive environment for all members of their community.
In conclusion, the report by The Washington Free Beacon regarding Columbia University’s decision to cut funding for Jeanine D’Armiento raises important questions about the role of university leaders in promoting a safe and inclusive campus environment. It underscores the need for universities to have clear policies and procedures in place to address instances of hate speech, discrimination, and violence on campus. By holding individuals accountable for their actions and words, universities can create a more inclusive and respectful environment where all members of the community feel valued and respected.