• Digital ID government control
• Efrat Fenigson digital currency
• Totalitarian control digital ID
• Programmable central bank
• State surveillance digital ID

Independent journalist Efrat Fenigson outlines how digital ID—once connected to programmable central bank digital currencies—grants government absolute totalitarian control.

“If you have a digital ID… your identity is revealed to the state for almost any action that you take,… pic.twitter.com/Q9Rl45BOhk

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) October 5, 2025

In a recent tweet, independent journalist Efrat Fenigson highlights the potential dangers of digital identification systems when coupled with programmable central bank digital currencies. According to Fenigson, this combination could pave the way for governments to exercise absolute totalitarian control over their citizens.

The concept of a digital ID is not new, as many countries already use some form of digital identification for various purposes. However, the integration of these digital IDs with central bank digital currencies could have far-reaching implications for individual privacy and civil liberties.

Fenigson argues that having a digital ID linked to a programmable central bank digital currency would essentially mean that every action taken by an individual would be closely monitored and recorded by the government. This level of surveillance could give the state unprecedented power to track and control its citizens’ behavior.

One of the key concerns raised by Fenigson is the potential for abuse of power by governments. With access to detailed information about every transaction and interaction, authorities could easily target and punish dissenting voices or political opponents. This level of control could stifle freedom of speech and expression, leading to a society where individual liberties are severely restricted.

Furthermore, the collection of such vast amounts of personal data raises serious privacy concerns. In a world where every purchase, communication, and movement is monitored, individuals would have little to no privacy or autonomy. This level of surveillance could have a chilling effect on society, as people may be hesitant to express themselves freely or engage in activities that could be deemed controversial.

Fenigson’s warning serves as a reminder of the importance of safeguarding individual freedoms and rights in an increasingly digital world. While digital IDs and central bank digital currencies may offer convenience and efficiency, they also pose significant risks to personal privacy and civil liberties.

It is crucial for governments and policymakers to carefully consider the implications of implementing such technologies and to ensure that proper safeguards are in place to protect the rights of individuals. Without adequate protections in place, the integration of digital IDs with central bank digital currencies could pave the way for a dystopian future where government surveillance and control are omnipresent.

In conclusion, Efrat Fenigson’s insights shed light on the potential dangers of combining digital identification systems with programmable central bank digital currencies. By raising awareness of these risks, we can work towards creating a future where technology serves to enhance, rather than infringe upon, individual freedoms and rights. It is imperative that we remain vigilant and proactive in safeguarding our privacy and civil liberties in the face of rapidly advancing digital technologies.

In a recent tweet from Wide Awake Media, independent journalist Efrat Fenigson sheds light on the potential dangers of digital IDs when connected to programmable central bank digital currencies. This connection could give governments unprecedented control over their citizens, leading to a state of absolute totalitarianism.

The concept of a digital ID may seem innocuous at first glance. After all, in today’s digital age, many of us already use some form of digital identification for various online transactions. However, the implications of tying this digital ID to programmable central bank digital currencies are far-reaching and alarming.

Imagine a world where every action you take, whether it’s purchasing groceries, paying bills, or even browsing the internet, is tracked and monitored by the government. With a digital ID linked to a central bank digital currency, your every move could be under scrutiny, eroding your privacy and autonomy.

One of the most significant concerns raised by Fenigson is the potential for mass surveillance. If the government has access to every transaction you make, they can build a comprehensive profile of your activities, preferences, and behaviors. This level of surveillance could be used to control and manipulate individuals, stifling dissent and opposition.

Moreover, the interconnected nature of digital IDs and programmable central bank digital currencies raises questions about data security and privacy. With sensitive personal information tied to a centralized system, the risk of data breaches and cyberattacks increases significantly. Hackers could exploit vulnerabilities in the system to steal identities, financial information, and other sensitive data.

Another troubling aspect of this system is the potential for discrimination and exclusion. Individuals who do not have access to a digital ID or central bank digital currency could be marginalized and left behind in a cashless society. This could exacerbate existing inequalities and create a two-tiered system where only those with digital IDs have full access to goods and services.

Fenigson’s warning serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked government control and surveillance. As we move towards a more digital and interconnected world, it is essential to safeguard our rights to privacy, autonomy, and freedom. We must critically examine the implications of technologies like digital IDs and central bank digital currencies and advocate for policies that protect individual liberties.

In conclusion, the convergence of digital IDs and programmable central bank digital currencies has the potential to grant governments unprecedented power over their citizens. It is crucial to remain vigilant and informed about the risks associated with these technologies and to advocate for policies that prioritize privacy, security, and individual rights. Let us work together to ensure that our digital future is one that upholds our fundamental freedoms and values.

1. Government surveillance
2. Totalitarian regime
3. Digital identity tracking
4. Programmable digital currencies
5. Central bank control
6. Privacy invasion
7. State monitoring
8. Identity disclosure
9. Efrat Fenigson analysis
10. Digital ID risks
11. Government oversight
12. Personal data exposure
13. Privacy infringement
14. State authority
15. Surveillance society
16. Identity verification
17. Government control
18. Centralized digital currency
19. Total control
20. Authoritarian regime