
Portland police, Antifa rioter, Patriot Prayer, violent comrades, charged convicted
I identified this Trantifa rioter to the Portland Police years ago and they never arrested him, or any of his violent comrades who brawled against Patriot Prayer that day. Only Patriot Prayer associates were charged and convicted. https://t.co/5FlpP8NXw8
— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) October 4, 2025
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
In a recent tweet, journalist Andy Ngo expressed his frustration with the Portland Police for not arresting a Trantifa rioter he identified years ago. Ngo claimed that despite his efforts to provide information about the violent individual and his comrades who clashed with Patriot Prayer members, only associates of Patriot Prayer were charged and convicted. This revelation sheds light on the perceived bias in law enforcement and the criminal justice system when it comes to handling cases involving political unrest and violence.
The tweet, posted on October 4, 2025, highlights Ngo’s ongoing concerns about the lack of accountability for individuals involved in violent protests and riots. Ngo’s claim that the Portland Police failed to take action against the Trantifa rioter he identified raises questions about the potential influence of political affiliations and ideologies on law enforcement decisions. The fact that only members of Patriot Prayer were charged and convicted in the incident further underscores the need for a fair and impartial approach to addressing such cases.
Ngo’s tweet also points to a larger issue of selective enforcement and double standards in the criminal justice system. By highlighting the disparity in treatment between different groups involved in the same incident, Ngo raises important questions about the fairness and integrity of law enforcement practices. The failure to hold all individuals accountable for their actions, regardless of their political beliefs or affiliations, undermines the credibility and legitimacy of the legal system.
Overall, Ngo’s tweet serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the principles of justice and equality in all aspects of law enforcement. By bringing attention to the apparent lack of accountability for the Trantifa rioter he identified, Ngo shines a spotlight on the need for greater transparency and accountability in addressing cases of political violence. Ultimately, Ngo’s tweet calls for a reexamination of how law enforcement agencies handle cases involving political unrest and emphasizes the importance of ensuring equal treatment under the law for all individuals involved.

I identified this Trantifa rioter to the Portland Police years ago and they never arrested him, or any of his violent comrades who brawled against Patriot Prayer that day. Only Patriot Prayer associates were charged and convicted. https://t.co/5FlpP8NXw8
— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) October 4, 2025
Have you ever heard of a case where a rioter was identified to the police, but never arrested? Well, that’s exactly what happened when a Trantifa rioter was pointed out to the Portland Police by journalist Andy Ngo years ago. It’s a shocking revelation that sheds light on the lack of accountability in certain situations, especially when it comes to political violence.
Identifying a suspect involved in criminal activities is usually a crucial step towards ensuring justice is served. However, in this particular case, despite being identified to the authorities, the Trantifa rioter was not apprehended, along with other violent individuals who were involved in a brawl against Patriot Prayer. What’s even more perplexing is that only associates of Patriot Prayer were charged and convicted, leaving the actual instigators of the violence scot-free.
This incident raises serious questions about the fairness and effectiveness of law enforcement in handling cases of political violence. It also brings into focus the issue of selective prosecution, where certain groups or individuals are targeted for legal action while others seem to evade accountability. Such disparities in the justice system can erode public trust and confidence in the authorities responsible for upholding the law.
It’s important to note that political violence, regardless of the ideology or motive behind it, should be condemned and addressed swiftly and impartially. All individuals involved in such acts should be held accountable for their actions, regardless of their affiliations or beliefs. Failure to do so not only undermines the rule of law but also emboldens perpetrators to continue their disruptive and dangerous behavior.
In a society that values justice and equality, it is essential that law enforcement agencies fulfill their duty to protect the public and uphold the law without bias or favoritism. When cases like the one highlighted by Andy Ngo occur, it not only raises concerns about the integrity of the justice system but also underscores the need for transparency and accountability in all aspects of law enforcement.
As we reflect on this troubling incident, it’s crucial to demand accountability from those responsible for maintaining law and order. Justice should be blind, and no one should be above the law. Only by holding individuals and groups accountable for their actions can we ensure a safe and just society for all.
In conclusion, the case of the Trantifa rioter identified to the Portland Police by Andy Ngo serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and shortcomings in our justice system. It highlights the need for greater transparency, accountability, and fairness in the enforcement of law and order. Let’s hope that incidents like these prompt meaningful change and lead to a more just and equitable society for everyone.
Portland Police, Antifa rioter, Patriot Prayer, violent comrades, brawled, charged, convicted, identified suspect, law enforcement, criminal investigation, political violence, far-left extremism, justice system, legal accountability, protest violence, criminal charges, community safety, public safety, extremist groups, criminal justice reform