Palantir snubs Keir Starmer, Dictator loses Palantir support, Keir Starmer digital ID rejection, Palantir refuses Keir Starmer, Palantir rejects Keir Starmer

BREAKING: Major software company Palantir declares they REFUSE to work with Keir Starmer on digital ID as “it wasn’t in their election manifesto”

The dictator is running out of friends. pic.twitter.com/kwIerYLeag

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— Inevitable West (@Inevitablewest) October 4, 2025

In a surprising turn of events, major software company Palantir has publicly declared that they refuse to work with Keir Starmer on digital ID due to it not being included in their election manifesto. This decision has raised eyebrows and sparked controversy, with many viewing it as a sign that the dictator is running out of friends.

The announcement was made by Palantir, a company known for its data analysis and software solutions, through a tweet on social media. The tweet, posted by user Inevitable West, highlighted Palantir’s stance on working with Keir Starmer and digital ID. According to the tweet, Palantir’s refusal to collaborate with the politician stems from the fact that digital ID was not a part of their election manifesto.

This development has left many wondering about the implications of Palantir’s decision and what it could mean for Keir Starmer’s digital ID plans. With Palantir being a major player in the software industry, their refusal to work with the politician could pose a significant hurdle for his proposed digital ID system.

The tweet also alludes to the idea that the dictator, presumably referring to Keir Starmer, is running out of friends. This statement suggests that Palantir’s decision is not an isolated incident but rather part of a larger trend of disapproval or distancing from the politician.

The timing of Palantir’s announcement is particularly notable, coming at a time when digital ID and data privacy issues are at the forefront of public discourse. With concerns about government surveillance and data security on the rise, Palantir’s refusal to collaborate on digital ID with Keir Starmer underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in such initiatives.

It remains to be seen how Palantir’s decision will impact Keir Starmer’s digital ID plans and whether it will prompt other companies or individuals to follow suit. The public reaction to this news has been mixed, with some applauding Palantir for taking a stand on principle while others questioning the company’s motives or the potential consequences of their decision.

Overall, Palantir’s refusal to work with Keir Starmer on digital ID due to it not being in their election manifesto has raised questions about the relationship between technology companies and politicians, as well as the role of transparency and accountability in government initiatives. As the debate continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how this development shapes the future of digital ID and data privacy in the political landscape.

In a recent development, a major software company Palantir has made a bold decision to refuse to work with Keir Starmer on digital ID. This decision was based on the fact that the project was not included in their election manifesto. The news was shared on Twitter by Inevitable West, highlighting the growing concerns surrounding the current political climate.

The refusal of Palantir to collaborate with Keir Starmer on digital ID has sparked a wave of reactions across social media platforms. Many people are questioning the motives behind this decision and what it means for the future of digital identity systems in the UK. The timing of this announcement is crucial, as it comes at a time when the government is facing scrutiny over its handling of various issues.

As the news spreads, it is clear that the dictator is running out of friends. The decision by Palantir to reject working with Keir Starmer sends a strong message about the importance of transparency and accountability in political dealings. It also raises questions about the role of technology companies in shaping government policies and decisions.

One of the key concerns raised by this development is the potential impact on digital ID projects in the UK. With Palantir, a major player in the software industry, refusing to participate, it could have significant implications for the implementation of digital identity systems. This decision highlights the importance of clear communication and alignment between government and private sector partners.

It is essential for government officials to work closely with technology companies to ensure that projects are in line with public expectations and priorities. The refusal of Palantir to collaborate with Keir Starmer underscores the need for a more transparent and inclusive approach to developing digital identity systems.

As the situation continues to unfold, it is crucial for stakeholders to engage in open and honest discussions about the future of digital ID in the UK. The decision by Palantir to decline working with Keir Starmer serves as a wake-up call for policymakers and industry leaders to prioritize public trust and accountability in their decision-making processes.

In conclusion, the breaking news about Palantir’s refusal to work with Keir Starmer on digital ID sheds light on the complexities of government and private sector partnerships. It underscores the need for clear communication, transparency, and accountability in shaping policies that impact the lives of citizens. As the dictator runs out of friends, it is imperative for all parties involved to work together towards a common goal of building a more secure and inclusive digital future for all.

Palantir software company, Keir Starmer, digital ID refusal, election manifesto, software partnership, government technology, privacy concerns, data security, political decisions, corporate ethics, technology integration, public trust, software development, government contracts, data protection, political controversy, technology solutions, ethical standards, public accountability, software collaboration