
- Pre-dawn raid media coverage
- FBI arrest news coverage
- Fort Lauderdale police backup CNN
- Dead end street arrest incident
- CNN exclusive arrest coverage
When I was arrested at 6 am in a pre-dawn raid the media was kept at bay behind a rope line approximately a quarter of a mile from my home on a dead end street. All except CNN.
When a local Fort Lauderdale police officer called in to provide back up to the FBI told the CNN… pic.twitter.com/ulndQ1MwLS
— Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) October 4, 2025
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
The tweet by Roger Stone recounts his experience of being arrested in a pre-dawn raid, where the media was kept at a distance from his home except for CNN. This incident took place in Fort Lauderdale, where a local police officer called in for backup by the FBI, and Stone highlights the preferential treatment given to CNN.
Roger Stone, a political consultant and former advisor to President Donald trump, has been a controversial figure in American politics. His arrest in the early hours of the morning in a dramatic fashion caught the attention of the media, with CNN being the only outlet allowed close access to the scene.
The tweet captures Stone’s frustration with the media coverage of his arrest, pointing out the special treatment given to CNN while other outlets were kept at a distance. This incident sheds light on the power dynamics between the media and law enforcement, as well as the influence of certain news organizations in shaping public perception.
Stone’s tweet is likely to spark debate and discussion about the role of the media in covering high-profile events, as well as the ethical implications of granting special access to certain outlets. As a prominent figure in the political landscape, Stone’s arrest and subsequent media coverage have raised questions about transparency, fairness, and accountability in the news industry.
Overall, Roger Stone’s tweet provides a glimpse into the behind-the-scenes dynamics of his arrest and the media coverage surrounding it. It serves as a reminder of the complexities of media relations in high-profile cases and the impact of media bias on public perception.

When I was arrested at 6 am in a pre-dawn raid the media was kept at bay behind a rope line approximately a quarter of a mile from my home on a dead end street. All except CNN.
When a local Fort Lauderdale police officer called in to provide back up to the FBI told the CNN… pic.twitter.com/ulndQ1MwLS
— Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) October 4, 2025
If you’ve been following the news lately, you may have come across a story about Roger Stone, a political consultant and former advisor to President Donald Trump. In a recent tweet, Stone shared a shocking incident that took place when he was arrested at 6 am in a pre-dawn raid. The media was kept at bay behind a rope line approximately a quarter of a mile from his home on a dead-end street, with one notable exception – CNN.
The incident unfolded as a local Fort Lauderdale police officer called in to provide backup to the FBI, but when he tried to relay information to CNN, he was blocked from doing so. This raised questions about the role of the media in such high-profile cases and the extent to which they should be allowed to intervene in law enforcement operations.
The media’s presence during arrests and raids has always been a contentious issue. On one hand, the public has a right to know about significant events involving public figures, especially those with political ties. On the other hand, the presence of cameras and reporters can sometimes interfere with the smooth operation of law enforcement activities.
In this case, the fact that CNN was allowed closer access than other media outlets raised eyebrows. It’s not uncommon for news organizations to compete for exclusive access to breaking news stories, but in this instance, it seemed to have crossed a line. The question remains: should the media be given special privileges in situations like these, or should they be held to the same standards as the general public?
One argument in favor of allowing the media closer access is that it serves the public interest by providing real-time updates on unfolding events. In the age of social media and instant news coverage, people expect to be kept informed about what’s happening in the world around them. By allowing reporters to be on the scene, the public can get a firsthand account of what’s happening, rather than relying on secondhand information.
On the other hand, critics argue that the media’s presence can sometimes hinder law enforcement efforts. When reporters get too close to the action, they risk interfering with police operations and compromising the safety of both officers and suspects. In cases where sensitive information is being shared or tactical maneuvers are being carried out, the last thing law enforcement needs is a camera crew getting in the way.
Ultimately, striking a balance between transparency and operational effectiveness is key. The media plays a crucial role in holding those in power accountable and keeping the public informed. However, this should not come at the expense of compromising the integrity of law enforcement operations.
As we reflect on the incident involving Roger Stone’s arrest, it serves as a reminder of the delicate dance between the media and law enforcement. While the media has a responsibility to report the news, law enforcement also has a duty to ensure the safety and security of all involved. Finding a middle ground that respects both parties’ interests is essential in maintaining a functioning democracy.
In conclusion, the incident involving Roger Stone’s arrest sheds light on the complex relationship between the media and law enforcement. While the media plays a vital role in keeping the public informed, it’s crucial to strike a balance that respects the integrity of law enforcement operations. As we navigate through these challenging times, it’s important to remember that transparency and accountability are the cornerstones of a free and democratic society.
- Media blackout during pre-dawn arrest
- FBI raid media restriction
- CNN exclusive coverage of arrest
- Police-FBI cooperation during arrest
- Fort Lauderdale police involvement in arrest
- Pre-dawn raid media control
- Exclusive CNN coverage of arrest
- Home arrest media coverage
- Dead end street arrest incident
- Arrest media distance restriction
- FBI coordination with local police
- CNN presence at early morning arrest
- Media kept at bay during arrest
- Police-FBI backup during arrest
- Exclusive CNN access to arrest scene
- Media restriction during early morning arrest
- Arrest incident on dead end street
- FBI-Fort Lauderdale police cooperation during arrest
- CNN’s role in arrest coverage
- Media exclusion during pre-dawn raid