Trump admin Muslim Brotherhood, State Dept terrorist org, broken promise, Trump Muslim Brotherhood designation, State Dept failed promise

I’m really shocked that under the trump administration, the Muslim Brotherhood still hasn’t been designated as a terrorist org despite promises from admin officials that we would see this happen.

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

The state Department made this promise months ago.

I hope it wasn’t a broken…

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) September 30, 2025

In a recent tweet, Laura Loomer expressed her shock and disappointment that the Muslim Brotherhood has not been designated as a terrorist organization by the Trump administration, despite promises from administration officials that this would happen. Loomer highlighted that the State Department made this promise months ago, and she hopes that it was not a broken promise.

The Muslim Brotherhood, founded in Egypt in 1928, is a transnational Islamist organization that has been accused of supporting terrorism and extremism. Many countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, have designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. However, the United States has not followed suit, despite calls from some politicians and commentators to do so.

The failure to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization has been a point of contention for many, who argue that the group’s ideology and actions warrant such a designation. Critics of the Muslim Brotherhood point to its support for Hamas, its involvement in violent activities in the Middle East, and its promotion of Islamist ideology as reasons for why it should be labeled a terrorist organization.

The Trump administration has been vocal in its criticism of the Muslim Brotherhood, with officials stating that the group poses a threat to U.S. national security. President Trump himself has referred to the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization and has expressed support for designating it as such. However, despite these statements, the administration has not taken concrete steps to make this designation a reality.

The lack of action on this issue has led to frustration and disappointment among those who believe that the Muslim Brotherhood should be designated as a terrorist organization. Laura Loomer’s tweet reflects this sentiment, as she expresses her shock that the administration has not followed through on its promises in this regard.

In conclusion, the issue of whether or not to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization remains a contentious one. While some argue that the group’s actions justify such a designation, others believe that doing so could have negative consequences. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether the Trump administration will take action on this issue or if it will remain unresolved.

It’s truly surprising that despite promises from administration officials, the Muslim Brotherhood has not yet been designated as a terrorist organization under the Trump administration. This issue has been a hot topic for months now, with many wondering why the State Department has failed to follow through on its commitment. The lack of action on this front has left many people, including Laura Loomer, questioning whether this promise will ever be fulfilled.

The Muslim Brotherhood has long been a controversial organization, with accusations of terrorist ties and extremist ideologies. Many have called for its designation as a terrorist group in order to address these concerns and prevent any potential threats posed by its members. However, despite assurances from the administration that this would happen, the process seems to have stalled.

One of the main reasons for the delay in designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization could be the complex nature of the issue. The process of designating an entity as a terrorist organization involves a thorough assessment of the group’s activities, connections, and impact. This evaluation can take time, especially when dealing with an organization as intricate and multifaceted as the Muslim Brotherhood.

Furthermore, political considerations may also be at play in this situation. The Trump administration has faced criticism in the past for its policies towards Muslim-majority countries and communities. Designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization could have broader implications for U.S. relations with these countries, as well as for domestic political dynamics. These factors may be influencing the administration’s approach to this issue.

It’s essential to remember that the process of designating an organization as a terrorist group is not a simple or straightforward one. It requires a careful and thorough evaluation of the facts and evidence, as well as consideration of the potential consequences of such a designation. The State Department’s promise to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization should not be taken lightly, and it’s crucial that this decision is made based on solid evidence and legal grounds.

In conclusion, the failure to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization under the Trump administration is a concerning issue that raises questions about the administration’s commitment to addressing extremist threats. The delay in taking action on this front is disappointing, especially given the promises that were made by administration officials. Hopefully, the State Department will follow through on its commitment and provide a clear and transparent explanation for the delay in designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

Trump administration, Muslim Brotherhood, terrorist designation, State Department promise, broken promise, national security threat, political controversy, administration officials, foreign policy decision, extremist organization, counterterrorism efforts, Islamic extremism, radical ideology, designated terrorist groups, government accountability, anti-terrorism measures, security concerns, international relations, policy implementation, extremist network.