Julian Assange revelations, Uranium One scandal, Russia hoax origins, Clinton uranium sale, Trump Russian asset theory

in 2016 – Julian Assange explained how then Secretary of state Hillary Clinton, through the Uranium One deal – sold 20% of our processed uranium directly to Russia – and that was the motivation behind the Russia Hoax and the desperation to paint trump early on as a Russian asset. pic.twitter.com/uozDwPFZlb

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

— The Rubber Duck (@TheRubberDuck79) September 28, 2025

In a tweet from The Rubber Duck, Julian Assange is quoted as explaining how then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sold 20% of America’s processed uranium to Russia through the Uranium One deal in 2016. This revelation sheds light on the alleged motivation behind the Russia Hoax and the early attempts to paint President Trump as a Russian asset.

The Uranium One deal has been a contentious subject for years, with critics arguing that it compromised national security by allowing a significant portion of America’s uranium supply to fall into the hands of a foreign power. Assange’s assertion that this deal was the driving force behind the Russia Hoax adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing debate surrounding Russian interference in American politics.

The Russia Hoax refers to the allegations that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. These claims have been a source of controversy and division in American politics, with supporters of President Trump dismissing them as a politically motivated witch hunt.

Assange’s statement suggests that the Russia Hoax was a smokescreen designed to distract from the real scandal of the Uranium One deal. By painting Trump as a Russian asset early on, Clinton and her allies may have been attempting to deflect attention away from their own questionable dealings with Russia.

The implications of Assange’s claim are significant, as they call into question the motives behind the Russia investigation and raise concerns about the integrity of America’s political system. If Clinton did indeed sell off a significant portion of America’s uranium to Russia, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a potential threat to national security.

As the debate over Russian interference in American politics continues to rage, Assange’s statement serves as a reminder of the complex web of interests and agendas that drive international relations. The Uranium One deal and its connection to the Russia Hoax highlight the need for transparency and accountability in government, as well as the importance of vigilance in protecting America’s interests from foreign influence.

Overall, Assange’s explanation offers a new perspective on the events of 2016 and raises important questions about the intersection of politics, national security, and foreign policy. Whether his claims will be fully investigated and addressed remains to be seen, but they have certainly added fuel to the ongoing debate over Russian interference in American politics.

In 2016, Julian Assange made a startling revelation about then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the controversial Uranium One deal. According to Assange, Clinton had sold 20% of the United States’ processed uranium directly to Russia. This shocking revelation shed light on the potential motivations behind what would later become known as the Russia Hoax, a narrative that aimed to paint President Trump as a Russian asset from the beginning. The implications of this deal and its connection to the Russia narrative sparked widespread debate and controversy.

The Uranium One deal, which was approved by the Obama administration in 2010, allowed a Russian state-owned company to acquire a controlling stake in Uranium One, a Canadian mining company with uranium assets in the United States. This deal raised concerns about national security and the potential for Russia to gain control of a significant portion of the United States’ uranium supply.

Assange’s claim that Clinton played a key role in facilitating this deal added a new layer of complexity to the ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. It suggested that there may have been ulterior motives behind the Russia narrative that dominated headlines for years.

The idea that Clinton’s actions in relation to the Uranium One deal were part of a broader effort to undermine President Trump and his administration gained traction among his supporters. They saw it as evidence of a deep-seated bias against Trump and a willingness to go to great lengths to discredit him.

As the Russia narrative continued to dominate the news cycle, with allegations of collusion and interference swirling around the Trump campaign, Assange’s revelation added fuel to the fire. It raised questions about the true origins of the Russia investigation and whether it was based on genuine concerns about foreign interference or if it was driven by political motivations.

The connection between the Uranium One deal and the Russia narrative highlighted the complexity of the political landscape in the United States. It underscored the deep divisions and suspicions that existed between political parties and the lengths to which some were willing to go to achieve their goals.

In the years since Assange’s revelation, the debate over the Uranium One deal and its implications for the Russia narrative has continued to simmer. It remains a contentious issue that has not been fully resolved, with both sides of the political spectrum offering differing interpretations of the events that transpired.

As we look back on these revelations and the subsequent fallout, it is clear that the Uranium One deal and its connection to the Russia narrative have had far-reaching implications for American politics. They have fueled debates, investigations, and conspiracy theories that have shaped public perceptions and influenced the course of political events.

In conclusion, the Uranium One deal and its connection to the Russia narrative have been a source of ongoing controversy and debate. Assange’s revelation about Clinton’s role in the deal shed light on the potential motivations behind the Russia narrative and added a new dimension to the already complex political landscape. The fallout from these revelations continues to reverberate through American politics, underscoring the deep divisions and suspicions that exist within the political system.

Julian Assange revelations, Uranium One scandal, Hillary Clinton corruption, Russia collusion hoax, Trump Russian asset, Uranium sale controversy, WikiLeaks disclosure, Clinton uranium deal, Russia influence scandal, Assange Clinton connection, Uranium One controversy, Trump-Russia narrative, Clinton Russia ties, Assange Russia revelation, Uranium deal fallout, Russian uranium purchase, Trump Russian collusion, Assange Clinton scandal, Uranium One fallout, Clinton Russia uranium sale.