
Larry Ellison surveillance trends, TikTok data centralization push, Oracle billionaire influence, CBS CNN ownership impact, total surveillance society 2025
Jewish billionaire Larry Ellison, owner of Oracle, CBS, CNN, and, now, TikTok wants data centralization and total surveillance:
“Citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re constantly watching & recording everything that’s going on.”
He is the man behind the… pic.twitter.com/RhAOeGtwCH
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Megatron (@Megatron_ron) September 27, 2025
Overview of Larry Ellison’s Vision for Data Centralization
In a recent tweet that has sparked significant discussion, Megatron (@Megatron_ron) highlighted comments made by Larry Ellison, the billionaire co-founder of Oracle and a prominent figure in the tech industry. Ellison’s vision for data centralization and surveillance has raised eyebrows, particularly because of his extensive influence over major media and tech platforms, including CBS, CNN, and TikTok. This summary delves into Ellison’s proposals and the implications they hold for privacy, governance, and the future of surveillance technology.
Who is Larry Ellison?
Larry Ellison is a prominent American entrepreneur and business magnate, best known as the co-founder of Oracle Corporation, a leading cloud computing and software company. His wealth and influence extend beyond Oracle, as he has investments in various other companies, including major media outlets. The recent tweet from Megatron not only underscores Ellison’s ambitions but also positions him as a significant player in discussions about data privacy and surveillance.
The Push for Data Centralization
Ellison’s call for data centralization is rooted in the belief that having a centralized system can lead to enhanced security and efficiency. He suggests that constant monitoring and data collection can encourage citizens to behave more responsibly. In his view, the idea of being "constantly watched and recorded" could deter individuals from committing crimes or engaging in anti-social behavior. This perspective raises critical questions about the balance between safety and personal privacy.
The Surveillance Society
Ellison’s remarks align with a growing trend toward surveillance in modern society. The integration of advanced technologies in everyday life—including smartphones, social media, and IoT devices—has led to an unprecedented level of data collection. While such technologies can enhance user experience and security, they also pose significant risks to individual privacy. Critics argue that Ellison’s vision could pave the way for a surveillance state where citizens are monitored continuously, leading to potential abuses of power.
Implications for Privacy and Civil Liberties
The implications of Ellison’s proposed data centralization are profound. Critics warn that such a system could infringe on civil liberties and human rights. The idea that "citizens will be on their best behavior" due to constant surveillance raises ethical concerns about freedom and autonomy. The potential for misuse of data by authorities or corporations could lead to a society where individuals are hesitant to express dissent or engage in behaviors that might be deemed suspicious.
The Role of Technology Companies
As the owner of major tech platforms, Ellison’s influence extends to how data is collected, stored, and used. Companies like TikTok, which has a vast user base, are often scrutinized for their data practices. Ellison’s push for data centralization may lead to increased pressure on tech companies to implement more robust surveillance measures. However, this raises questions about the responsibilities of these companies in protecting user data and ensuring transparency in their practices.
Public Reaction and Concerns
The concept of data centralization and surveillance has elicited mixed reactions from the public. While some may see the potential benefits in terms of safety and crime reduction, many others express concern over privacy violations and the ethical implications of such monitoring. There is a growing demand for clear regulations and guidelines governing data collection and surveillance practices to ensure that individual rights are upheld.
The Future of Surveillance Technology
As technology continues to advance, the conversation around surveillance and data centralization is likely to intensify. Ellison’s comments serve as a catalyst for discussions about the future of technology in society. Policymakers, tech leaders, and the public must work together to find a balance that maximizes safety without compromising individual freedoms. The challenge lies in creating frameworks that allow for innovation while protecting personal data rights.
Conclusion
Larry Ellison’s vision for data centralization and total surveillance raises critical questions about the future of privacy and civil liberties in a technologically advanced society. As a powerful figure in the tech industry, his influence could shape the trajectory of surveillance practices and data collection. The implications of his proposals warrant careful consideration and dialogue among stakeholders to ensure a future that respects individual rights while addressing societal safety needs.
The conversation around data centralization is more relevant than ever, as citizens grapple with the trade-offs between security and privacy. As technology continues to evolve, it is imperative that discussions about surveillance and data practices remain at the forefront, ensuring that the rights of individuals are protected in an increasingly surveilled world.

Ellison’s Bold Plan: Total Surveillance for ‘Better Behavior’
” />
Jewish billionaire Larry Ellison, owner of Oracle, CBS, CNN, and, now, TikTok wants data centralization and total surveillance:
“Citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re constantly watching & recording everything that’s going on.”
He is the man behind the… pic.twitter.com/RhAOeGtwCH
— Megatron (@Megatron_ron) September 27, 2025
Jewish Billionaire Larry Ellison: A Vision for Data Centralization
When you think about tech giants, names like Larry Ellison often come to mind. This Jewish billionaire is not just the owner of Oracle but also has stakes in CBS, CNN, and TikTok. Recently, he made headlines by advocating for data centralization and total surveillance. His controversial statement that “citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re constantly watching & recording everything that’s going on” has sparked heated debates about privacy and freedom in the digital age.
But what exactly does this mean for us? Let’s dive deeper into Ellison’s vision and its implications for society.
Ellison’s Entrepreneurial Journey
Larry Ellison’s journey is nothing short of inspiring. Co-founding Oracle in 1977, he transformed the company into a global leader in database technology. His business acumen and relentless pursuit of innovation have catapulted him to billionaire status. With ownership stakes in major media companies like CBS and CNN, he has influenced not just the tech industry but also how we consume information.
Now, with TikTok in his portfolio, he’s stepping into the realm of social media, where data privacy concerns are more pronounced than ever. TikTok has faced scrutiny over its data practices, and Ellison’s push for data centralization raises eyebrows about how user information will be managed.
The Call for Data Centralization
Ellison’s call for data centralization is particularly provocative. Centralization means that all data would be stored in one place, controlled by a single entity—potentially Oracle or one of the companies he owns. Advocates argue that this approach could lead to greater efficiency and easier access to information. However, the downsides are glaring.
Centralized data models are vulnerable to breaches. If a single database is compromised, it could expose millions of users’ personal information. Moreover, the idea that “citizens will be on their best behavior” because they are being watched raises ethical questions. Should we sacrifice privacy for perceived safety?
Surveillance: A Double-Edged Sword
Ellison’s vision of total surveillance is a hot topic of discussion. While surveillance can deter crime and enhance security, it also poses significant risks to civil liberties. The notion of constant monitoring can lead to a society where people feel they are always being watched, stifling free expression and individualism.
In a world where every click and interaction is recorded, how do we balance safety and freedom? The implications of a surveillance state can be dire, as history has shown. Countries that have implemented extensive surveillance measures often see a decline in personal freedoms.
The Social Media Landscape: A New Era of Monitoring
As social media continues to evolve, so do the methods for monitoring user behavior. Companies like TikTok collect vast amounts of data, which can be used to tailor content and advertisements. But what happens when this data is centralized under one powerful figure like Larry Ellison?
With TikTok’s immense popularity, especially among younger users, concerns about data privacy are heightened. The idea that a single individual could oversee such a massive amount of personal information is unsettling. Users might unwittingly give away their preferences, habits, and even their locations, all while scrolling through their feeds.
The Ethical Dilemma of Surveillance Technology
The ethical implications of surveillance technology are complex. On one hand, proponents argue that surveillance can help prevent crime and improve public safety. On the other hand, critics warn that it can lead to a loss of privacy and abuse of power. Ellison’s comments highlight a growing trend in the tech industry towards accepting surveillance as a norm.
Should we accept that our lives are under constant watch in exchange for safety? Or should we advocate for a balance that protects individual liberties? These questions are crucial as we navigate an increasingly digital world.
Public Reaction and Future Implications
The public reaction to Ellison’s statements has been mixed. While some support the idea of data centralization and surveillance for enhanced security, others express concerns about the potential for abuse and loss of privacy. As more people become aware of the implications of such policies, we can expect increased scrutiny of tech giants and their practices.
The future of surveillance technology and data centralization will likely shape the way we interact with technology and each other. As citizens, it’s essential to remain informed and engaged in discussions about our rights to privacy and freedom.
Moving Forward: Awareness and Advocacy
In an era where technology is advancing at an unprecedented rate, awareness is key. It’s essential for individuals to understand the implications of data centralization and surveillance. Advocacy for privacy rights and ethical tech practices must become a priority.
As Larry Ellison continues to shape the tech landscape, we must hold him and others accountable for the impact of their decisions on society. Engaging in dialogue about these issues can lead to a more informed public and better policies that protect our freedoms.
In summary, the conversation around Larry Ellison’s vision for data centralization and total surveillance is just beginning. It challenges us to think critically about privacy, safety, and the future of technology. As we navigate these complex waters, staying informed and engaged will empower us to advocate for a future that respects both our security and our individual rights.
Larry Ellison surveillance agenda, Oracle data centralization strategies, TikTok privacy concerns 2025, CBS media influence, CNN news ownership impact, billionaire data control, digital surveillance capitalism, citizen monitoring technologies, ethical implications of data tracking, social media data privacy issues, tech mogul influence on society, future of digital privacy 2025, centralized data management systems, implications of constant surveillance, billionaire tech entrepreneurs, data privacy legislation 2025, public behavior under surveillance, consequences of mass data collection, tech industry and personal freedom, digital rights in 2025.