family conflict, social media activism, political silence, humanitarian issues, Tess Holliday 2025

Body positivity activist Tess Holliday says she’s blocked her entire family because they are “quiet” on Palestine, Congo and Sudan.

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

“I literally blocked my brother yesterday. I’m not speaking to my mom, my stepmom, my dad…I’m like, who can I block next?” pic.twitter.com/z2iERFD4Rx

— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) September 27, 2025

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

Tess Holliday’s Bold Stance on Activism and Family Dynamics

In a striking declaration of her values and beliefs, body positivity activist Tess Holliday has recently shared her decision to sever ties with her entire family due to their silence on pressing global issues, specifically the situations in Palestine, Congo, and Sudan. In a candid expression of her frustrations, Holliday stated, “I literally blocked my brother yesterday. I’m not speaking to my mom, my stepmom, my dad…I’m like, who can I block next?” This statement not only highlights her commitment to activism but also raises questions about the dynamics of family relationships in the face of social justice issues.

Understanding Tess Holliday’s Activism

Tess Holliday, known for her advocacy for body positivity and inclusivity, has gained considerable attention for her outspoken nature on various social issues. Her recent comments underscore a growing trend where individuals, particularly those in the public eye, are using their platforms to address not just personal but also societal challenges. As a body positivity advocate, Holliday emphasizes the importance of self-acceptance and challenges traditional beauty standards. However, her activism extends beyond body image to encompass broader humanitarian concerns, such as the crises in Palestine, Congo, and Sudan.

The Silence of Family

Holliday’s frustration stems from what she perceives as a lack of engagement from her family regarding significant global issues. In a time when social media allows for widespread awareness and activism, her family’s silence is seen as complicity or indifference to suffering and injustice. For many activists, including Holliday, familial support is crucial; when that support is absent, it can lead to feelings of isolation and disappointment.

The Impact of Social Media on Activism

Social media has transformed the landscape of activism, allowing individuals like Holliday to voice their opinions and mobilize support for various causes. Platforms like Twitter enable users to share their thoughts and connect with like-minded individuals across the globe. Holliday’s decision to speak out about her family’s silence reflects a broader cultural shift where personal relationships are increasingly scrutinized through the lens of social justice. The viral nature of posts and tweets can amplify these sentiments, creating a community of support for those who share similar beliefs.

The Consequences of Activism on Personal Relationships

Holliday’s choice to block her family members serves as a poignant reminder of the potential consequences of activism on personal relationships. While standing firm in one’s beliefs is commendable, it can also lead to rifts within families, as differing values and priorities come to light. The act of blocking family members on social media signifies a boundary being drawn, indicating that Holliday prioritizes her commitment to activism over maintaining relationships with those who do not share her concerns.

Exploring the Issues at Hand

The issues that Holliday mentions—Palestine, Congo, and Sudan—represent significant humanitarian crises that have garnered international attention. The ongoing conflict in Palestine continues to raise concerns about human rights violations, while the situations in Congo and Sudan involve complex challenges such as political instability, armed conflict, and humanitarian needs. Activists like Holliday advocate for awareness and action regarding these issues, emphasizing the importance of not remaining silent in the face of injustice.

The Role of Activism in Family Dynamics

Holliday’s experience raises questions about how activism influences family dynamics. For some, activism can be a source of pride and connection, fostering discussions about values and ethics within the family. For others, particularly when there are divergent views, it can lead to conflict and estrangement. The challenge lies in navigating these relationships while remaining true to one’s principles and convictions.

Emotional Toll of Activism

The emotional toll of being an activist cannot be understated. Individuals like Holliday often face backlash, not just from the public but also from their immediate circles. The decision to cut off family members can come with feelings of guilt and sorrow, as familial bonds are deeply rooted in emotional connections. Holliday’s public expression of her feelings indicates the weight of this decision and the internal struggle that accompanies such actions.

The Power of Personal Choice in Activism

Ultimately, Holliday’s situation illustrates the power of personal choice in activism. Each individual must determine what they are willing to tolerate and what compromises they are unwilling to make. For Holliday, blocking her family members serves as a form of self-protection and a reaffirmation of her values. It reflects a growing trend where individuals prioritize their principles over traditional familial loyalty, particularly in an era where social justice issues are increasingly at the forefront of public discourse.

Conclusion

Tess Holliday’s recent actions demonstrate the complex interplay between activism and personal relationships in an age of heightened awareness about social justice issues. Her decision to distance herself from family members who remain silent on critical global matters highlights the challenges activists face when their values clash with those of their loved ones. As social media continues to serve as a powerful tool for advocacy, the dialogue surrounding family dynamics and activism will likely evolve, prompting deeper discussions about loyalty, justice, and the responsibilities individuals hold toward each other and the world.

In sum, Holliday’s bold stance is not just a personal decision; it resonates with many who grapple with similar dilemmas, emphasizing the need for open communication and shared values within families. As we navigate these turbulent times, the importance of standing up for what we believe in remains paramount, even when it comes at a personal cost.