Governor Newsom, U.S. Constitution, California jurisdiction, Supremacy Clause review, federal agents unmasking

Governor Newsom is confused about his role under the U.S. Constitution. He oversees California, not federal agencies. He should review the Supremacy Clause.

California’s law to “unmask” federal agents is unconstitutional, as the state lacks jurisdiction to interfere with federal… pic.twitter.com/9ZWlFRxHMi

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli) September 26, 2025

In a recent tweet, Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli criticized Governor Newsom for his stance on federal agents operating in California. Essayli accused Newsom of being confused about his role under the U.S. Constitution, emphasizing that the Governor oversees California, not federal agencies. He suggested that Newsom review the Supremacy Clause, which establishes the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land.

The tweet specifically mentions California’s law to “unmask” federal agents, calling it unconstitutional due to the state lacking jurisdiction to interfere with federal operations. Essayli’s tweet highlights the ongoing debate over the balance of power between state and federal authorities, with Newsom’s actions being seen as an overreach by some.

This tweet is part of a larger conversation about the separation of powers and the limits of state authority in relation to federal government actions. It reflects the tension between state autonomy and federal supremacy, with Essayli arguing that Newsom is overstepping his bounds by attempting to regulate federal activities within California.

The controversy surrounding Newsom’s actions underscores the complex legal and political dynamics at play in the United States. As Governor of California, Newsom is tasked with representing the interests of his state while also adhering to the constraints of federal law. Essayli’s tweet serves as a reminder of the intricate relationship between state and federal governments, and the ongoing debates over jurisdiction and authority.

Overall, this tweet highlights the ongoing debate over the balance of power between state and federal authorities, with Essayli’s criticism of Governor Newsom sparking discussions about the limits of state authority and the supremacy of federal law. The tweet underscores the complexities of governance in a federal system and the challenges of navigating the sometimes conflicting interests of state and federal governments.

Governor Newsom seems to be causing quite a stir with his recent comments about his role under the U.S. Constitution. It appears that he may be a bit confused about where his authority lies. As the Governor of California, his jurisdiction is limited to the state itself, not federal agencies. Perhaps he should take a moment to review the Supremacy Clause, which clearly outlines the hierarchy of laws in the United States.

In a tweet by Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, it was pointed out that California’s law to “unmask” federal agents is unconstitutional. The state simply does not have the jurisdiction to interfere with federal agencies in this manner. It’s essential to understand the separation of powers between the federal government and the states to avoid overstepping boundaries.

It’s crucial for state leaders like Governor Newsom to respect the division of powers outlined in the Constitution. While states have the authority to govern themselves within their borders, they must also adhere to federal laws and regulations. This balance is what ensures a functioning and fair system of government for all citizens.

The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI of the Constitution, clearly establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law in the event of a conflict. This means that Governor Newsom and other state officials must abide by federal laws, even if they disagree with them. It’s a fundamental principle of our democracy that ensures the rule of law is upheld at all levels of government.

When state laws clash with federal laws, it can create confusion and legal challenges that could have far-reaching consequences. It’s essential for all government officials to understand their roles and responsibilities under the Constitution to avoid unnecessary conflicts and legal battles. By respecting the Supremacy Clause and the division of powers, we can maintain a system of government that functions effectively and fairly for all.

In conclusion, Governor Newsom should take the time to review the Supremacy Clause and understand his role under the U.S. Constitution. While it’s natural for state leaders to advocate for their constituents, they must also recognize the limits of their authority. By respecting the division of powers and adhering to federal laws, we can ensure that our system of government operates smoothly and fairly for all.

1. Governor Newsom confusion role U.S. Constitution
2. California oversight federal agencies
3. Newsom Supremacy Clause review
4. Unmasking federal agents California law
5. Constitutional jurisdiction federal interference
6. Governor Newsom federal agency confusion
7. California vs federal jurisdiction
8. Newsom U.S. Constitution role
9. Supremacy Clause California law
10. Federal agents unmasking unconstitutional
11. Governor Newsom jurisdiction confusion
12. California federal interference
13. U.S. Constitution oversight California
14. Newsom role federal government
15. Supremacy Clause review California
16. Unmasking federal agents unconstitutional
17. Governor Newsom role confusion
18. California federal law interference
19. Newsom U.S. Constitution review
20. Supremacy Clause federal jurisdiction.