Comey indictment ready, Evidence not shaky, Siebert blocking charges, Allegations against Siebert, High-profile indictment.

NEW REPORTING: @Comey

I understand the indictment was ready to go.  

I am told “all the evidence was there,” not a “shaky” criminal case as characterized some media reporting.

Critics of former US Attorney Erik Siebert allege he was “blocking” or “slow walking” the charges. https://t.co/z0j1FDtZ4E

In a recent development, new reports have emerged regarding the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. According to sources, the indictment was reportedly ready to go, with all the necessary evidence in place to support the charges. Contrary to some media reports characterizing the case as shaky, it is believed that the case against Comey was strong and solid.

Critics of former US Attorney Erik Siebert have accused him of allegedly “blocking” or “slow walking” the charges against Comey. This has led to speculation and debate over the handling of the case by Siebert and whether there were any ulterior motives behind his actions.

The news of the indictment has sparked interest and curiosity among the public, as Comey’s tenure as FBI Director was marked by controversy and political turmoil. His interactions with President trump and his handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails have been the subject of intense scrutiny and debate.

The revelations about the indictment shed new light on the legal troubles facing Comey and raise questions about the potential consequences he may face if the charges are pursued. It remains to be seen how this development will unfold and what impact it will have on Comey’s reputation and legacy.

As the story continues to develop, it is important to stay informed and follow the latest updates to understand the full scope and implications of the indictment against James Comey. Stay tuned for more details and insights into this unfolding legal drama.

NEW REPORTING: @Comey

Recent developments have shed new light on the case against former US Attorney Erik Siebert. According to sources, the indictment was ready to go, with all the evidence in place to support the charges. Contrary to some media reports, the case was not “shaky” and had a strong foundation.

Allegations Against Siebert

Critics of Siebert have accused him of “blocking” or “slow walking” the charges, suggesting that he may have been intentionally delaying the process. These allegations have raised eyebrows and sparked further scrutiny into Siebert’s handling of the case.

It is important to note that these allegations are still under investigation and have not been proven. However, they have raised concerns about potential misconduct within the legal system.

Implications of the Delay

The delay in bringing charges against Comey has significant implications for the case. It raises questions about the integrity of the legal process and whether political influences may have played a role in the decision-making process.

Furthermore, the delay has allowed Comey to continue his activities without facing the consequences of his alleged actions. This has frustrated those who believe in accountability and justice for all individuals, regardless of their status or position.

Moving Forward

As the investigation into Siebert’s handling of the case continues, it is crucial for transparency and accountability to prevail. The legal system must uphold its duty to pursue justice without fear or favor, and any potential wrongdoing must be addressed swiftly and decisively.

Only time will tell how this situation will unfold, but one thing is certain: the eyes of the public are watching closely, eager to see justice served in a fair and impartial manner.

For more information on this developing story, please visit the official Twitter account of @Comey for the latest updates.

FBI director, James Comey, FBI investigation, Department of Justice, government corruption, political scandal, legal obstruction, criminal charges, indictment evidence, Erik Siebert controversy, law enforcement, judicial misconduct, federal prosecutor, investigative journalism, whistleblower allegations, court proceedings, public scrutiny, political interference, legal accountability, constitutional crisis.