Illegal FISA warrants, DOJ conspiracies, Comey scandal 2025, FBI misconduct claims, Judicial approval issues

Well well well.

It isn’t just Comey.

DOJ admitted 4 of 4 FISAs were illegal.

They all knew and signed anyway.

DOJ/FBI Approved FISA:

Yates
Boente
Comey
McCabe
Rosenstein

Judges Approved FISA:

Dearie
Collyer
Conway
Mosman

“No Dossier, no FISA warrants.” -McCabe

Conspiracy https://t.co/lDy2Fzc7wj

The Illegality of FISA Warrants: A Deep Dive into the DOJ Admission

In a startling revelation from the Department of Justice (DOJ), it has come to light that all four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants issued during a pivotal investigation were deemed illegal. This significant admission not only raises questions about the integrity of the DOJ and the FBI but also casts a shadow over the judicial oversight involved in the FISA process. The implications of this revelation stretch beyond the individuals involved and touch upon the foundational principles of American justice and civil liberties.

Key Figures Involved in the FISA Warrants

The FISA warrants in question were approved by several high-ranking officials within the DOJ and the FBI. These include:

• Sally Yates: Former Deputy Attorney General
• David Boente: Acting Attorney General
• James Comey: Former FBI Director
• Andrew McCabe: Former Deputy FBI Director
• Rod Rosenstein: Former Deputy Attorney General

  Each of these individuals played a crucial role in the approval process, raising serious doubts about their judgment and the protocols followed in national security cases.

  Additionally, the warrants also required the approval of judges, who are supposed to act as an independent check on the government’s surveillance powers. The judges involved included:

• Judge Raymond Dearie
• Judge Rosemary Collyer
• Judge James Boasberg
• Judge Marco A. Hernandez

  The involvement of these judges further complicates the narrative, as it suggests a systemic failure in the oversight mechanisms designed to protect citizens’ rights.

  The Impact of the “No Dossier, No FISA Warrants” Statement
  

  Andrew McCabe, a key figure in the investigation, famously stated, “No Dossier, no FISA warrants.” This assertion underscores the crucial role that the Steele Dossier played in the pursuit of these warrants. The Dossier, which was compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, contained unverified allegations about then-candidate Donald trump and his connections to Russia.

  The reliance on this controversial document raises questions about the standards of evidence required for obtaining FISA warrants. It also highlights a broader issue concerning the politicization of intelligence and how it can be manipulated to justify surveillance activities against American citizens.

  Systemic Issues within the DOJ and FBI
  

  The admission that all four FISA warrants were illegal points to a more profound systemic issue within the DOJ and the FBI. Critics argue that this reflects a broader culture that prioritizes political objectives over legal and ethical standards. The repeated failures in the FISA process suggest a need for reform in how intelligence is gathered and utilized, particularly when it involves American citizens.

  The consequences of these illegal warrants are far-reaching. They not only undermine public trust in the institutions that are supposed to protect citizens’ rights but also set a dangerous precedent for future surveillance practices. If high-ranking officials can overlook legal requirements for the sake of expediency, it opens the door for further abuses of power.

  Judicial Oversight: A Critical Examination
  

  The role of the judges who approved these FISA warrants must also be critically examined. The FISA court is designed to serve as a safeguard against government overreach, yet these revelations indicate that the judges may have inadequately scrutinized the evidence presented to them. This raises questions about the effectiveness of the FISA court’s oversight capabilities and whether reforms are necessary to ensure that the rights of citizens are adequately protected.

  The judges involved in the FISA warrant approvals are not immune from scrutiny. Their decisions reflect a balance between national security interests and civil liberties, and the failure to uphold this balance can lead to significant ramifications for individual rights.

  Implications for Future Surveillance Practices
  

  The DOJ’s admission of the illegal nature of these FISA warrants has significant implications for future surveillance practices. As public awareness of these issues grows, there is likely to be increased demand for transparency and accountability within the DOJ and FBI. Citizens are becoming more vigilant about their rights and the government’s ability to surveil them without proper justification.

  As discussions around privacy, surveillance, and civil liberties continue, it is essential for lawmakers and regulators to consider reforms that strengthen oversight mechanisms. This includes revisiting the standards for obtaining FISA warrants and ensuring that any evidence used is thoroughly vetted and substantiated.

  Conclusion: A Call for Accountability and Reform
  

  The acknowledgment that all four FISA warrants were illegal is a wake-up call for the DOJ, the FBI, and the judicial system as a whole. It underscores the need for accountability and reform within these institutions to prevent future abuses of power. As the public becomes increasingly aware of these issues, it is crucial that steps are taken to restore trust in the mechanisms designed to protect civil liberties.

  The fallout from these revelations will likely continue to unfold in the coming months and years. As citizens, we must remain informed and engaged, advocating for transparency and accountability in our government. Only through vigilance can we ensure that the principles of justice and liberty are upheld for all.

  In summary, the illegality of the FISA warrants is not just a legal issue; it is a matter of national importance that speaks to the core values of American democracy. The path forward must prioritize the protection of citizens’ rights while balancing the legitimate needs of national security.

Well well well.

It’s hard to ignore the implications of recent admissions from the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding the infamous FISA warrants. The DOJ has now acknowledged that all four of the FISA applications related to the Trump campaign were illegal. This shocking revelation raises serious questions about the integrity of the process and the individuals involved. It wasn’t just former FBI Director James Comey; a whole slew of high-ranking officials and judges were complicit.

It isn’t just Comey.

When we talk about the FISA warrants that were deemed illegal, it’s important to recognize that multiple key figures in the DOJ and FBI signed off on these applications. Among them were Sally Yates, Dana Boente, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Rod Rosenstein. Each one of these individuals had a role in the approval process, which should have been a safeguard against such egregious missteps. Their signatures carried weight, and the knowledge that these warrants were based on questionable grounds raises eyebrows. If you’re curious about their involvement, you can check out more details in the official DOJ reports.

DOJ/FBI Approved FISA:

• Sally Yates
• Dana Boente
• James Comey
• Andrew McCabe
• Rod Rosenstein

What’s particularly alarming is that these officials all knew the implications of their actions. They signed off on these warrants despite having knowledge that they were built on shaky ground. This isn’t merely a procedural failure; it is a significant breach of trust. The public expects its agencies to operate within the law, and when they don’t, it diminishes faith in the very institutions meant to uphold justice.

Judges Approved FISA:

• Judge Dearie
• Judge Collyer
• Judge Conway
• Judge Mosman

Let’s not forget the judges who approved these FISA warrants. Judges Dearie, Collyer, Conway, and Mosman also played a crucial role in the legitimacy of this process. When judges are supposed to act as impartial checks on the system, it’s troubling to see that they too were a part of this flawed process. If the legal framework itself is compromised, then what does that mean for the future of justice in our country?

“No Dossier, no FISA warrants.” -McCabe

This quote from Andrew McCabe sums it up perfectly. The entire justification for these FISA warrants was built on the infamous Steele dossier, a document filled with unverified claims. McCabe’s admission that without the dossier there would have been no FISA warrants reveals just how weak the foundation of this investigation was. It’s a reminder that the intelligence community must rely on accurate information to carry out its duties effectively. When that information is flawed or fabricated, it can lead to dire consequences.

Conspiracy

The situation begs the question: Was this all a conspiracy? The narrative surrounding the FISA warrants and the subsequent investigations into the Trump campaign has been riddled with controversy and debate. Many argue that there was a coordinated effort to undermine a political opponent, which is a serious accusation that cannot be taken lightly. If you want to dive deeper into the conspiracy theories surrounding this issue, check out this Fox news article that explores various perspectives.

As we reflect on these developments, it’s crucial to engage in open discourse about the implications of such actions. The fact that the DOJ has admitted to the illegality of these warrants should serve as a wake-up call for all citizens. We must hold our institutions accountable and ensure that they operate within the bounds of the law. Transparency and integrity are paramount in maintaining public trust.

In the end, the revelations surrounding the FISA warrants are just the tip of the iceberg. They highlight a systemic issue within our intelligence and legal frameworks. As citizens, we have a responsibility to stay informed and advocate for reforms that will prevent such occurrences in the future. Our democracy relies on the rule of law, and it’s our duty to protect it.

FISA scandal, illegal surveillance, DOJ accountability, FBI misconduct, Comey revelations, FISA warrant abuse, conspiracy theories, Yates testimony, McCabe statements, Rosenstein role, judicial oversight failure, Collyer court ruling, political corruption, intelligence community failures, warrantless spying, Dearie investigation, FBI oversight, legal consequences, civil liberties violations, 2025 FISA reforms