
Trump UN speech reaction, defund United Nations debate, globalist organizations criticism
BREAKING: President trump posts statement on his speech at the @UN
An escalator and teleprompter aren’t the only things broken there
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Who else thinks America should defund this corrupt, globalist organization? pic.twitter.com/npk9Xc19ir
— John Strand (@JohnStrandUSA) September 23, 2025
BREAKING: President Trump posts statement on his speech at the @UN
In an unexpected twist, President Trump has shared his thoughts following his recent speech at the United Nations. In a statement that has already stirred conversations across social media, Trump highlighted that “an escalator and teleprompter aren’t the only things broken there.” This remark suggests his dissatisfaction with not just the logistics of the event but also with the underlying workings of the UN itself.
An escalator and teleprompter aren’t the only things broken there
Trump’s choice of words indicates a deeper frustration with the United Nations, a platform he has often criticized for being ineffective or misaligned with American interests. The mention of broken equipment serves as a metaphor for what he perceives as a flawed organization. His statement resonates with many supporters who feel that the UN has strayed from its original purpose and has become a “corrupt, globalist organization.”
Who else thinks America should defund this corrupt, globalist organization?
The question posed by Trump—“Who else thinks America should defund this corrupt, globalist organization?”—is provocative and reflects a sentiment shared by a significant portion of his base. Critics of the UN argue that American taxpayers should not fund an institution that they believe undermines U.S. sovereignty and interests. This statement could reignite debates about the U.S.’s financial contributions to international organizations and whether these funds are being used effectively.
As these discussions progress, it will be interesting to see how this statement influences public opinion and policy regarding the United Nations. The conversation is far from over, and many are eager to weigh in on this critical issue.