Kamala, drunk again
2024 election, popular vote
Closest presidential race 21st century
Kamala Harris, swing states
2024 election loss, closest

Kamala says that the 2024 election— in which she lost every single swing state and the popular vote— “ended up being the closest presidential election in the 21st century.”

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

Must be drunk again.pic.twitter.com/uTo9S4Lo2W

— CJ Pearson (@thecjpearson) September 23, 2025

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

In a tweet posted by CJ Pearson on September 23, 2025, he criticized Kamala Harris for claiming that the 2024 election, in which she lost every swing state and the popular vote, was the closest presidential election in the 21st century. Pearson implied that Harris must have been drunk to make such a statement, highlighting the absurdity of her claim.

Kamala Harris, who served as the Vice President of the United States under President Joe Biden, faced a tough defeat in the 2024 election. Despite her loss in every swing state and the popular vote, Harris made the controversial claim that the election was the closest in the 21st century. This assertion drew sharp criticism from Pearson, who questioned her sobriety at the time of making such a statement.

The tweet by Pearson quickly gained traction on social media, with many users expressing disbelief at Harris’ assertion. Some pointed out the irony of her claim, given the clear margin of victory for her opponent in the election. Others speculated on the reasons behind Harris’ statement, with some suggesting that she may have been under the influence of alcohol when she made the remark.

Overall, the tweet by CJ Pearson serves as a reminder of the importance of factual accuracy in political statements. In a time when misinformation and false claims are rampant, it is crucial for public figures to be held accountable for their words. The backlash against Harris’ claim highlights the need for transparency and honesty in political discourse, as well as the power of social media in calling out falsehoods.

As the 2024 election remains a contentious topic, with debates continuing over the legitimacy of the results, Harris’ statement adds fuel to the fire. By asserting that the election was the closest in the 21st century, despite clear evidence to the contrary, Harris opens herself up to further scrutiny and criticism. It remains to be seen how this incident will impact her political career moving forward.

In conclusion, the tweet by CJ Pearson sheds light on the controversy surrounding Kamala Harris’ claim about the 2024 election. By calling into question her sobriety and highlighting the absurdity of her assertion, Pearson sparks a larger conversation about the importance of honesty and accuracy in political discourse. As the debate over the 2024 election continues, Harris’ statement serves as a reminder of the need for transparency and accountability in public statements.

When Kamala Harris made the statement that the 2024 election was the closest presidential election in the 21st century, it raised quite a few eyebrows and sparked a debate. Many people were quick to point out that she had lost every single swing state and the popular vote. It led to speculation that she must have been drunk when making such a claim. Let’s delve into this topic and explore the various perspectives surrounding it.

Must be drunk again.

The phrase "Must be drunk again" is a stark commentary on Kamala Harris’s statement about the 2024 election. It implies that her claim was so outlandish and disconnected from reality that the only plausible explanation is that she was under the influence of alcohol. This kind of blunt and unfiltered language is common on social media platforms, where users often express their opinions in a direct and confrontational manner.

The Controversy Surrounding Kamala Harris’s Statement

Kamala Harris’s assertion that the 2024 election was the closest in the 21st century despite losing every swing state and the popular vote immediately sparked controversy. Critics were quick to point out the inconsistencies in her statement and questioned the validity of her claim. The fact that she lost key battleground states and the overall popular vote seemed to contradict her characterization of the election as the closest in recent history.

The 2024 Presidential Election

In the 2024 presidential election, Kamala Harris ran against her opponent in a highly contentious and closely watched race. The outcome of the election was a subject of intense speculation and debate, with both sides claiming victory in the aftermath. However, the final results showed that Harris had lost every swing state and the popular vote, leading to her opponent’s victory.

Analysis of Kamala Harris’s Statement

When analyzing Kamala Harris’s statement about the 2024 election, it’s essential to consider the context in which it was made. While it may seem surprising that she described the election as the closest in the 21st century despite losing key states and the popular vote, it’s essential to understand that politicians often frame their narratives in a way that aligns with their agenda. In this case, Harris may have been trying to downplay the significance of her defeat by emphasizing the narrow margin of victory for her opponent.

The Role of Social Media in Shaping Public Opinion

Social media platforms like Twitter play a significant role in shaping public opinion and driving the conversation around political events. The tweet that brought attention to Kamala Harris’s statement quickly went viral, generating thousands of likes, retweets, and comments. This kind of rapid dissemination of information can influence how people perceive political figures and events, leading to the amplification of certain narratives and perspectives.

The Impact of Misinformation in Politics

The spread of misinformation and disinformation in politics is a pervasive issue that can have far-reaching consequences. In the case of Kamala Harris’s statement about the 2024 election, the misrepresentation of facts and the distortion of reality can erode trust in political institutions and sow division among the electorate. It’s essential for individuals to critically evaluate the information they consume and to seek out reliable sources to inform their opinions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Kamala Harris’s statement about the 2024 election being the closest in the 21st century despite losing every swing state and the popular vote has sparked controversy and debate. The phrase "Must be drunk again" encapsulates the skepticism and disbelief that many people feel about her claim. As we navigate the complex landscape of modern politics, it’s crucial to approach information with a critical eye and to engage in thoughtful dialogue to promote understanding and unity.

Kamala Harris, 2024 election, swing states, popular vote, closest presidential election, 21st century, lost election, political statement, election results, voting statistics, presidential race, controversial statement, election outcome, political defeat, public opinion, political commentary, election analysis, electoral college, political strategy, presidential campaign