Supreme Court decision trump Biden FTC, Rebecca Slaughter termination ruling, activist judges impact on administration
BREAKING — SCOTUS SIDES WITH TRUMP: Allows him to FIRE Biden FTC appointee Rebecca Slaughter, 6-3
Good riddance!
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Activist judges lose AGAIN, and are reminded they’re NOT the President pic.twitter.com/Zv1FR1C4ZZ
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 22, 2025
SCOTUS SIDES WITH TRUMP: Allows him to FIRE Biden FTC appointee Rebecca Slaughter, 6-3
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of the United States has sided with former President Trump, allowing him to fire Biden’s Federal Trade Commission (FTC) appointee, Rebecca Slaughter. The decision was made with a 6-3 vote, marking a notable moment in the ongoing political tug-of-war. This ruling has sparked a lot of discussions across social media platforms, especially among supporters of Trump’s administration.
Good Riddance!
The reaction from Trump’s supporters has been overwhelmingly positive. Many see this decision as a victory against what they term “activist judges.” They believe that this ruling is a reminder that the judiciary is not a political entity but should uphold the authority of the President. The sentiment is clear: supporters are relieved to see what they view as an overreach by the Biden administration being curtailed.
Activist Judges Lose AGAIN
Critics of the judiciary’s recent trends argue that the Supreme Court’s decision highlights a broader issue of judicial activism. They assert that the role of judges should be to interpret the law, not to make it. The opinion among Trump’s base is that this ruling serves as a check against judicial overreach, reinforcing the notion that judges should remain impartial and not engage in political matters.
They’re NOT the President
This ruling reaffirms the principle that the President holds ultimate authority over executive appointments. It emphasizes the separation of powers, reminding everyone involved that while judges have a critical role, they do not have the authority to dictate executive decisions. For many, this is a crucial aspect of maintaining balance in the U.S. government system.
The repercussions of this ruling are likely to be felt across various sectors as the political landscape continues to shift. Keep an eye on related developments as this story unfolds further. For more insights, check out the original tweet from Nick Sortor for additional context.