
Starmer regime, sharia police, social media threat, England 2025, custody threat
Starmer’s regime send what appears to be sharia police to threaten to take a lady’s daughter into custody if she doesn’t hand over her phone.
The child’s “crime”?
Looking at a social media post!
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
This is England 2025.
pic.twitter.com/Yr4Xx1i4Rz— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) September 21, 2025
In a shocking turn of events, a video posted on social media by Tommy Robinson shows what appears to be Sharia police threatening to take a woman‘s daughter into custody if she does not hand over her phone. The reason for this extreme action? The child was caught looking at a social media post.
This incident, which allegedly took place in England in 2025, has sparked outrage and raised concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the encroachment of Sharia law in the country. The video has garnered widespread attention, with many expressing disbelief and anger at the actions of what is being described as Starmer’s regime.
The video shows a group of individuals, dressed in what appears to be traditional Islamic attire, approaching the woman and demanding that she hand over her phone. They threaten to take her daughter into custody if she does not comply. The woman is visibly distressed and tries to reason with them, but they remain adamant.
The incident has raised questions about the power and authority of Sharia police in England, and whether they are acting with the approval of the government. Many are concerned that such actions could lead to a slippery slope of further encroachments on individual freedoms and rights.
Critics of Starmer’s regime have seized on this incident as evidence of a dangerous trend towards authoritarianism and the erosion of democratic values. They argue that the government should be protecting its citizens’ rights, not infringing on them in the name of religious law.
The video has sparked a heated debate on social media, with many calling for an investigation into the incident and for those responsible to be held to account. Some have expressed fear and concern about the future of civil liberties in England, while others have defended the actions of the Sharia police as necessary to maintain order and uphold religious values.
Regardless of one’s stance on the issue, it is clear that this incident has struck a nerve and raised important questions about the role of religion in a secular society, the limits of state power, and the need to protect individual freedoms and rights. As the debate continues to unfold, it will be crucial for citizens and leaders alike to engage in a thoughtful and respectful dialogue about these complex and contentious issues.

Starmer’s regime send what appears to be sharia police to threaten to take a lady’s daughter into custody if she doesn’t hand over her phone.
The child’s “crime”?
Looking at a social media post!
This is England 2025.
pic.twitter.com/Yr4Xx1i4Rz— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) September 21, 2025
In a shocking turn of events, it has come to light that under Starmer’s regime, what appears to be sharia police were sent to threaten to take a lady’s daughter into custody if she didn’t hand over her phone. The reason for this alarming incident? The child’s “crime” was simply looking at a social media post. This incident paints a grim picture of England in 2025, raising concerns about privacy, freedom of speech, and the overreach of government authority.
The incident, as reported by Tommy Robinson on Twitter, highlights a concerning trend in the erosion of civil liberties and personal freedoms. The idea of police officers, or in this case, individuals resembling sharia police, showing up at someone’s doorstep and demanding access to their personal devices is a chilling prospect. It raises questions about the boundaries of state surveillance and the extent to which individuals can be subjected to such invasive measures without due cause.
The use of the term “sharia police” is particularly troubling, as it suggests a form of policing that is based on religious or cultural beliefs rather than the rule of law. It brings into question the separation of church and state, and the potential for discrimination or bias in the enforcement of laws. The implications of such actions are far-reaching and could have serious consequences for individual rights and freedoms.
This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of safeguarding privacy and protecting freedom of expression in a democratic society. It underscores the need for robust legal protections to prevent government overreach and abuse of power. It also highlights the role of social media in shaping public discourse and the potential risks associated with online communication.
As we navigate the complexities of the digital age, it is essential to strike a balance between security and liberty, between protecting individuals’ rights and ensuring public safety. The incident involving the lady and her daughter serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked authority and the need for vigilance in upholding democratic values.
In conclusion, the incident involving the threat to take a lady’s daughter into custody for simply looking at a social media post is a troubling development that raises serious concerns about the state of civil liberties in England in 2025. It serves as a wake-up call to the importance of protecting privacy, freedom of speech, and the rule of law in a democratic society. As we confront the challenges of the digital age, it is imperative that we remain vigilant in defending our rights and freedoms against any form of overreach or abuse of power. Let this incident serve as a reminder of the need to uphold the principles of justice, equality, and respect for individual rights in our society.
- Keir Starmer, authoritarian government, civil liberties, police state, Sharia law enforcement, threat to freedom, parental rights, digital privacy, social media censorship, child custody, dystopian future, UK politics, human rights violation, surveillance state, government overreach, family separation, online surveillance, oppressive regime, totalitarian rule, digital crackdown.